Sorry You Have No Evidence

Do you believe in god?   What is a god? Are you asking me if magic exists? Well my answer as an ignostic atheist is first prove the actuality of simple magic before you try to ask anyone about the possibility of some supreme magic. What theists seem to forget is that the concept of gods including one they favor are a thing limited to belief they are not some proven fact known. Thus, atheists not believing have no extended requirement to disprove the concept of gods that have never been proven or substantiated in any knowable way to begin with, in this way the concept of gods are like a failed hypothesis that lack any need for continued acceptance. Such reasoning appeals to the thinking that claims offered without real evidence can just as simply be dismissed without real evidence as well. Not believing things unproven have no requirement to disprove offhand unless we make a claim there is no gods or that the thing in question is proven in which case it would have a requirement to disprove if one disbelieves as disbelieving proven things carries the moniker of denialism unless one provides otherwise. So without a reality coherent definition, “god” is a meaningless concept unworthy of genuine consideration outside of it connecting to claims in myths and fables. Consider the proposition of the existence of a “pink unicorn”. When asserting the proposition, one can use attributes to at least describe the concept such a cohesive idea is transferred in language. With no knowledge of “pink unicorn”, it can be described minimally with the attributes “pink”, “horse”, and “horn”....