A thinker who earnestly directs, analyses, and challenges their own beliefs is brave. For it is better to search not like one with a belief to prove, no, first one must drill down into the belief exposing any and all flaws and if there is be willing to address it and if needed remove it. And after doing so myself as a god believer, it was a difficult life choice leave Religion and all its thinking errors but I realized was more valuable. How would we act is the point, we where are different as Non-theistic and Non-magical beliefs is not unreasonable, rather it’s often an exhibition of intellectual honesty accepting the natural world as it presents itself, which is only natural, then why is that seen as so bad? Like, what if we leveled the full weight of reason in an intellectual honesty critique of our one”s own beliefs not leaving any free of rebuilding or disbelief.