Dude, I want to read your refutations of certain arguments for God’s existence?

Biases in reasoning may lead people to create beliefs based on false assertions, then reach flawed conclusions which may motivate irrational behaviors. “Dude, I want to read your refutations of certain arguments for God’s existence?” – Challenger  My response, What is a god? I need no more than that not you nor anyone can actually get past that. Here is a meme.   My response, Ha ha, there is a meme. “Begging the question. Ha ha 🙂“- Challenger My response, What the offer of the term god “is” but an example of Begging the question. as the terms meaning assumes the initial point that the term god has a valid beginning, it does not. The empty term god is no more than the noise of words, talking unjustifiably, it is indeed a logical fallacy in which the writer or speaker assumes the term god statement which is under examination to be true or contain a truth quality, to which it does not in any way. “This is similar to the Omnipotent Paradox question: “Can God create a stone so heavy that He can’t lift?” If He can’t then He is not all powerful but asking God to create such a thing is an act that is contrary to His nature which is omnipotence because it is defined as doing all that is logically possible.“- Challenger My response, If you cannot give a valid ontology of what is a “god” and limited only to what a god is, to even get me to entertain the god concept seriously. Until then I will not. It is the same vacuous waste of...