If you want to change the world Click Here and read to the end as it is only then that the mental revolution will begin. If you are free enough from the shackles of your fear. Are you really that brave? I would think not, but I can always hope. I wish you well.
“Without an economy, there is no justice. Do you support Antifa riots, arson, and looting?” – Challenger
Other person commented – “The riots are bad, of course. People are deprived of property, physically endangered, emotionally stressed, and confidence in the government’s ability to maintain order is eroded. But, we can all agree that this is an evil. However, that conclusion is not particularly relevant. The important question is “Is this a greater or lesser evil than the (various local, state, and federal) governments’ failure to provide justice to the people?”. It is not Antifa that is killing an average of three citizens per day. It is the police. This demands action and when law enforcement agencies and governments ensure that peaceful action is ineffective, they virtually guarantee violent action. Whether this is morally acceptable or not is irrelevant. It will occur whether repugnant to our sensibilities or not. Though I suspect that you would find violent action morally acceptable in at least some circumstances, given that you advertise that you work for an organization whose sole purpose is to kill people and break things.”
Challenger to the Other person – “Nice use of the Moving the Goalposts fallacy, aka the Demanding Impossible Perfection fallacy. You moved the goalposts to police killing anyone for any reason. You obviously need a class on why policing forces have existed in every society since the dawn of civilization. Policing in the USA has never been more professional than today, yet Antifa uses bogus “police brutality” pretexts to promote violent revolution while we’re in the middle of a pandemic crisis. That is really a despicable and vile level of treachery, like robbing a seriously injured person who was just in an accident.”
Other person commented – “It is not at all clear that Antifa supports that. Most especially since Antifa is not an organization, but a movement, and one that demonstrates a fair bit of variety in how anti-authoritarian or counter-authoritarian they wish to be. To be sure there are radical collectivists among them, but there are also liberals. Making the statement that government shouldn’t be killing unarmed citizens, tear-gassing peaceful demonstrators, and suppressing voters will draw in many types.”
My response, I am Antifa
“Anti-fascists linked to zero murders in the US in 25 years. As Trump rails against ‘far-left’ fascism, new database shows leftwing attacks have left far fewer people dead than violence by rightwing extremists.” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/27/us-rightwing-extremists-attacks-deaths-database-leftwing-antifa
My response, I support humanity.
“Damien AtHope That’s great ????” – Challenger
“I’m just kinda trolling ya. I couldn’t care less if you call yourself Antifa if you’re not a violent arsonist, looter, and rioter, etc. I’m a secular humanist, too, just not a radical socialist. More of a moderate liberal agnostic. It should be a big tent, lol. Btw, that database is a load of crap. Just offhand, radicals murdered 5 cops in Dallas, 4 cops in Baton Rouge, 2 cops in NYC, a Rastafarian Trump supporter in Wisconsin, 4 people in Fresno, etc. Many more. Criminals non-coincidently overwhelmingly vote radical Dem; that’s about a million violent crimes a year, falsely described as “random”, as though done by non-thinking natural forces.” – Challenger
My response, Not Antifa just because you want it to be. and I am now waiting for you to list all the right-wing terrorists that are our real problem.
My response, If one is a humanist they are known as such by their behaviors, not the label they claim.
My response, In case you missed it.
“Damien AtHope I don’t use the right-left language on principle as it is incredibly inaccurate. Why are violent regressive jihadists put on “the left,” for instance? I’m a moderate liberal, so of course, I condemn and demonize both radical and extremist terrorists. If violent, they should be rounded up and imprisoned, and possibly executed after trial. They are all a “real problem.” The database follows the faulty left-right spectrum, not what is or isn’t “Antifa”, which is itself an umbrella term for many fellow-traveller radical groups. It’s clear the those examples I listed fall in the radical camp. Well, most of the UN human rights council members (Bolivia, China, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, France, Gabon, Malawi, Mexico, Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Senegal, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan) don’t really care about freedom of expression or assembly at home, so it’s a little rich for them to have superficial concern for antifa in the USA, where antifa is still very free to do what it does.” – Challenger
My response, So again you don’t explain the rightwing threat and I am left wondering what you mean by saying you are a secular humanist? What do you mean by that term and what do you think it has as an obligation? Here is my art and thoughts on humanism.
My response, My art and thoughts on secularism.
My response, “Secular humanism, often simply referred to as humanism, is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, secular ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_humanism
My response, “Who are the secular humanists? Perhaps everyone who believes in the principles of free inquiry, ethics based upon reason, and a commitment to science, democracy, and freedom. Perhaps even you.” — Paul Kurtz (1925 – 2012), founder of the Council for Secular Humanism and Free Inquiry Magazine.
My response, “Secular humanism is comprehensive, touching every aspect of life including issues of values, meaning, and identity. Thus it is broader than atheism, which concerns only the nonexistence of god or the supernatural. Important as that may be, there’s a lot more to life … and secular humanism addresses it. Secular humanism is nonreligious, espousing no belief in a realm or beings imagined to transcend ordinary experience. Secular humanism is a lifestance, or what Council for Secular Humanism founder Paul Kurtz has termed a eupraxsophy: a body of principles suitable for orienting a complete human life. As a secular lifestance, secular humanism incorporates the Enlightenment principle of individualism, which celebrates emancipating the individual from traditional controls by family, church, and state, increasingly empowering each of us to set the terms of his or her own life.” https://secularhumanism.org/what-is-secular-humanism/
My response, “Secular Humanism begins with denial or doubt concerning the existence of anything supernatural—including God—but then goes well beyond that secular stance by positively affirming and valuing the potential of human beings to be kind, enact justice, solve problems, and make the world a better, safer, greener, and more humane place. Secular Humanism rests firmly upon the recognition that humanity’s ability to be cruel, selfish, deceitful, and violent is far outweighed by our more pervasive and dominant capacities to be humane, altruistic, cooperative, sensible, fair, and peaceful. A Secular Humanist is someone who does not believe in the otherworldly tenets of religion, but does believe in the many noble and righteous things of this world, such as cooperation, reason, education, science, humor, inquiry, democracy, compassion, tolerance, imagination, open debate, human rights—and then some.” https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-secular-life/202002/what-is-secular-humanism
“Damien AtHope Yeah, that’s what I believe. Secular humanism rejects religious, ethnic, racial, and nationalist extremism, and it doesn’t include radical socialism nor does it reject capitalism. Just because I say I reject Antifa doesn’t mean I don’t also reject bigoted/violent extreme “rightwing” groups, which I do reject. That’s the definition of being a moderate, rejecting both sides–the radicals who hate society and want to start over from the root, and the extremists stuck in dogmatic tradition to the point of hate. I read this yesterday from my favorite evolutionary biologist, @BretWeinstein: “I have come to regard a partisan mindset as a serious and contagious mental disorder. It may well prove to be the more dangerous of the 2020 pandemics.” – Challenger
My response, So, if that is true you believe this then I guess you are not voting for Trump as you acknowledge that he is a king of toxic partisan mindset, right? What do you mean by radical socialism?
“That’s great for you, but I don’t think humanism can be comprehensive, which strikes me as very dogmatic sounding. It’s open-ended, and continuously evolving, IMO. I agree humanism has a few principles, but they are very general. If humanism was a specific worldview, it would be just another religion. Humanists can still peacefully and rationally disagree on things like drug laws, abortion, and capital punishment without reverting to stone age supernaturalism and war. What objectively makes a better society and is agreed to by a democratic process is generally the answer. Both Biden and Trump are terrible candidates. They are both incredibly partisan and toxic. I’m voting for the Transhumanist Party candidate as I did in 2016. I mean a radical form of socialism, e.g., communism, which Antifa clearly supports. It’s clear to me, but okay. Antifa is not a registered organization by design, as intended to provide deniability of involvement in violence to its organizers. It’s a typical design of terror groups. The many independent, diverse police departments in the USA recognize the constitutional right to peacefully assemble; they use far less force when violence breaks out compared to police in the vast majority of countries. They aren’t perfect, but that is no legitimate basis for rioting and destroying the economy.” – Challenger
My response, Do you know the different kinds of socialism? I am not a Communist, nor do I support it. I am an anarchist socialist (Libertarian socialism or social anarchism). “Libertarian socialism, sometimes called left-libertarianism, social anarchism, and socialist libertarianism, is a political philosophy within the socialist movement that rejects the view of socialism as state ownership or command of the means of production within a more general criticism of the state form itself as well as of wage labor relationships within the workplace in the form of wage slavery. It emphasizes workers’ self-management of the workplace and decentralized structures of political government, asserting that a society based on freedom and equality can be achieved through abolishing authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_socialism#Li
My response, Antifa started with and still has mainly a Libertarian socialism or social anarchism theme. Though all kinds of people even pro-capitalists sometimes support and do activism with the label Antifa. “The label Antifa involves a highly decentralized movement, Antifa political activists are anti-racists who engage in protest tactics, seeking to combat fascists and racists such as neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other far-right extremists. Individuals involved in the movement tend to hold anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, anti-fascist, and anti-state views, subscribing to a range of left-wing ideologies such as anarchism, communism, Marxism, social democracy, and socialism. Some scholars argue that Antifa is a legitimate response to the rise of the far-right and that Antifa’s violence such as milk shaking is not equivalent to right-wing violence. Scholars tend to reject the equivalence between Antifa and white supremacism.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States
“Damien AtHope Okay, great, I’m for making free enterprise better for society too. Antifa is still predominately a communist outfit, so you might want to reconsider saying you are antifa. Just saying, lol!” – Challenger
My response, Antifa: by Anti-Defamation League “The anti-fascist protest movement known as antifa gained new prominence in the United States after the white supremacist Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, VA, in August 2017. While most counter-protestors tend to be peaceful, there have been several instances where encounters between antifa and the far-right have turned violent. Their ideology is rooted in the assumption that the Nazi party would never have been able to come to power in Germany if people had more aggressively fought them in the streets in the 1920s and 30s. Most antifa come from the anarchist movement or from the far left, though since the 2016 presidential election, some people with more mainstream political backgrounds have also joined their ranks. These antifa sometimes use a logo with a double flag, usually in black and red. Today, antifa activists focus on harassing right-wing extremists both online and in real life. Antifa is not a unified group; it is a loose collection of local/regional groups and individuals.” https://www.adl.org/who-we-are
My response, I have a video of me chastising the proactive violence by Antifa to two Antifa friends telling al to stop such unethical behaviors. So what do you do to challenge extremists and do you have evidence that you personally condemned any right extremists? I hold all accountable regardless of the side or political thinking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKM8dXjwsoA&t=2s
My response, I also condemn Antifa violence strongly in this video talking with Matt Dillahunty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T7eJK-uD0M&t=2983s
My response, Here are a few types of anarchism thinking.
“Damien AtHope It’s a false dilemma. A pox on both the extremist “alt-right” and the radical “antifa.” There is a third way, democratic humanism; not a combination of both, but a rejection of both. Of course I condemn “rightwing” extremists every day. I’m doing so now. That’s great you’re so active about it. I condemn seditious malcontents of all stripes, especially when they violently take advantage of a national emergency to push their malevolent agendas. Maybe one day I’ll get out there too and help you when there’s common ground.” – Challenger
Other person commented to Challenger, “So do you also condemn the brutal police forces across the United States, which collectively kill over ten times the number of citizens than the law enforcement agencies of the European Union, a collection of 27 countries having a population 200 million people larger than the U.S.? What explains the inferiority of law enforcement that causes so much more harm to the citizenry, yet is so ineffective in preventing/addressing crime? The U.S. kills more of its citizens, imprisons more (absolutely and proportionally) than the worst dictatorships and communist regimes, yet still has more violent crime. In a nation that has more guns than people, and allows gun ownership of some kind in every single state, officers cannot simply kill people every time they suspect the presence of a weapon. If government resists every reasonable measure to reform policing, unreasonable measures will be taken. Just to be clear: This is not a justification or a promotion but a prediction. Don’t blame the weatherman for the hurricane.”
Challenger to the Other person, “I agree as a general statement with your last paragraph, it’s just not legitimately applicable to the USA. I think “civilian brutality”, an irresponsible gun culture, and a culture of crime proceeds attempts at law enforcement and its excesses. That is the problem in the USA right now, not policing per se, which is very professional. Though not excusable, all these high-visibility “police brutality” cases add up to just a few dozen over 20 years, and most are far from cut and dried. The riot organizers don’t care about policing, they are revolutionary zealots skilled at propaganda and inciting people using false pretexts and dubious statistics.”
My response to Challenger,
My response, I am an Anarcho-Humanist as one of my personal main labels.
My response, “These 5 far-right extremist groups could pose a national security threat in the run-up to the election: 1. The Boogaloo Bois, 2. QAnon, 3. The Proud Boys, 4. The Three Percenters movement, 5. The Wolverine Watchmen.” https://www.alternet.org/2020/10/here-are-5-far-right-extremist-groups-or-movements-that-pose-a-national-security-threat-in-the-us
My response, “Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most U.S. Terrorist Attacks, Report Finds White supremacist groups have carried out a majority of “terrorist plots and attacks” this year, according to a report by a think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/us/domestic-terrorist-groups.html#:~:text=Far-Right%20Groups%20Are%20Behind%20Most%20U.S.%20Terrorist%20Attacks%2C,far-right%20group%E2%80%99s%20rally%20in%20Portland%2C%20Ore.%2C%20in%20September
My response, “Far-right extremists behind majority of US domestic terror attacks in 2020.” https://nypost.com/2020/10/23/far-right-extremists-behind-many-us-terror-attacks-in-2020
“Damien AtHope Yes, that’s true. I’d add to that violent domestic jihadist groups too, as they are extremist, dogmatic, religious traditionalists, thus definitionally “far right”.” – Challenger
My response, “WASHINGTON—White supremacists and other right-wing extremists accounted for two-thirds of domestic terrorist attacks and plots so far in 2020, but those by antifascist and other leftist groups are rising, according to a new report on U.S. political violence.” We need to speak out against all unethical violence and even though the far-right is a bigger threat I still condemn the unethical violence done by the far-left. To me in general, violence is only ok in self-defense and/or for other-defense. We can’t claim to be much different if we act the same as those we find unethical. https://www.wsj.com/articles/far-right-groups-cited-in-domestic-terror-attacks-11603367633
My response, I am very against domestic violence as well as against child abuse as well. Here is my art against domestic violence.
My response, Here is one of my art against child abuse.
My response, I am against the jihadist extremist that kill and harm due to art. So I made this art years ago to address my thoughts on that.
My response, Or the Christian fascists, here is art for them.
My response, My art addresses extremists.
My response, My art against child abuse.
My response, You are on a side as the world of politics is just that way. It is like saying you don’t choose a side in morality. It is something that happens just as one is an atheist regardless of what label they choose as it is a position on belief in gods. He is on a political spectrum even if he denies it. Philosophy doesn’t need you to understand it to do it.
My response, Secular Humanism, and Politics: When Should We Speak Out? by Paul Kurtz —“Secular humanists should speak out and act when they believe that their cherished values and beliefs are at stake; they should seek to persuade their fellow citizens about the principles that they consider important to endorse and defend.” —https://mm-gold.azureedge.net/Articles/current_issue/secularhuma
My response, “Let me hasten to say that, although we are concerned with moral and political issues, we should not be identified simply with any political party or particular candidates for office. We should guard against politicizing humanism. We have long argued in the pages of Free Inquiry that we should be open to Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, libertarians and social democrats, radicals and centrists, Greens and Independents. There is no single humanist response to every complex social or public issue that may arise. Ideologically, secular humanists may be laissez-faire free-marketeers or democratic socialists; they may believe in the mixed economy or a federal world government. They all should have a place within the “mansion” of humanism.” https://mm-gold.azureedge.net/Articles/current_issue/secularhu
“Damien AtHope I think Paul Kurtz understood the false ideologies of both the so-called right and left: Wikipedia: “Kurtz was left-wing in his youth, but has said that serving in the United States Army in World War II taught him the dangers of ideology. He saw the Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps after they were liberated, and became disillusioned with Communism when he encountered Russian slave laborers who had been taken to Nazi Germany by force but refused to return to the Soviet Union at the end of the war.[10]”
My response,
My response, “Left-wing politics supports social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy.[1][2][3][4] Left-wing politics typically involves a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished.[1] According to emeritus professor of economics Barry Clark, left-wing supporters “claim that human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_politics
My response, “Right-wing politics represents the view that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics, or tradition.[4]:693, 721[5][6][7][8][9] Hierarchy and inequality may be seen as natural results of traditional social differences[10][11] or the competition in market economies.[12][13][14] The term right-wing can generally refer to “the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics
While hallucinogens are associated with shamanism, it is alcohol that is associated with paganism.
The Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries Shows in the prehistory series:
Show two: Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”
Show tree: Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”
Show four: Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”
Show five: Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”
Show six: Emergence of hierarchy, sexism, slavery, and the new male god dominance: Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves!
Prehistory: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” the division of labor, power, rights, and recourses: VIDEO
Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO
Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO
Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO
Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Pre-Capitalism): VIDEO
Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves: VIEDO
Paganism 5,000 years old: progressed organized religion and the state: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Kings and the Rise of the State): VIEDO
Paganism 4,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (First Moralistic gods, then the Origin time of Monotheism): VIEDO
I do not hate simply because I challenge and expose myths or lies any more than others being thought of as loving simply because of the protection and hiding from challenge their favored myths or lies.
The truth is best championed in the sunlight of challenge.
An archaeologist once said to me “Damien religion and culture are very different”
My response, So are you saying that was always that way, such as would you say Native Americans’ cultures are separate from their religions? And do you think it always was the way you believe?
I had said that religion was a cultural product. That is still how I see it and there are other archaeologists that think close to me as well. Gods too are the myths of cultures that did not understand science or the world around them, seeing magic/supernatural everywhere.
I personally think there is a goddess and not enough evidence to support a male god at Çatalhöyük but if there was both a male and female god and goddess then I know the kind of gods they were like Proto-Indo-European mythology.
This series idea was addressed in, Anarchist Teaching as Free Public Education or Free Education in the Public: VIDEO
Our 12 video series: Organized Oppression: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of power (9,000-4,000 years ago), is adapted from: The Complete and Concise History of the Sumerians and Early Bronze Age Mesopotamia (7000-2000 BC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szFjxmY7jQA by “History with Cy“
Show #1: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Samarra, Halaf, Ubaid)
Show #2: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power
Show #3: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Uruk and the First Cities)
Show #4: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (First Kings)
Show #5: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Early Dynastic Period)
Show #6: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power
Show #7: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Sargon and Akkadian Rule)
Show #9: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Gudea of Lagash and Utu-hegal)
Show #12: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Aftermath and Legacy of Sumer)
The “Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries”
Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ Atheist Leftist @Skepticallefty & I (Damien Marie AtHope) @AthopeMarie (my YouTube & related blog) are working jointly in atheist, antitheist, antireligionist, antifascist, anarchist, socialist, and humanist endeavors in our videos together, generally, every other Saturday.
Why Does Power Bring Responsibility?
Think, how often is it the powerless that start wars, oppress others, or commit genocide? So, I guess the question is to us all, to ask, how can power not carry responsibility in a humanity concept? I know I see the deep ethical responsibility that if there is power their must be a humanistic responsibility of ethical and empathic stewardship of that power. Will I be brave enough to be kind? Will I possess enough courage to be compassionate? Will my valor reach its height of empathy? I as everyone, earns our justified respect by our actions, that are good, ethical, just, protecting, and kind. Do I have enough self-respect to put my love for humanity’s flushing, over being brought down by some of its bad actors? May we all be the ones doing good actions in the world, to help human flourishing.
I create the world I want to live in, striving for flourishing. Which is not a place but a positive potential involvement and promotion; a life of humanist goal precision. To master oneself, also means mastering positive prosocial behaviors needed for human flourishing. I may have lost a god myth as an atheist, but I am happy to tell you, my friend, it is exactly because of that, leaving the mental terrorizer, god belief, that I truly regained my connected ethical as well as kind humanity.
Cory and I will talk about prehistory and theism, addressing the relevance to atheism, anarchism, and socialism.
At the same time as the rise of the male god, 7,000 years ago, there was also the very time there was the rise of violence, war, and clans to kingdoms, then empires, then states. It is all connected back to 7,000 years ago, and it moved across the world.
Cory Johnston: https://damienmarieathope.com/2021/04/cory-johnston-mind-of-a-skeptical-leftist/?v=32aec8db952d
The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist (YouTube)
Cory Johnston: Mind of a Skeptical Leftist @Skepticallefty
The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist By Cory Johnston: “Promoting critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics by covering current events and talking to a variety of people. Cory Johnston has been thoughtfully talking to people and attempting to promote critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics.” http://anchor.fm/skepticalleft
Cory needs our support. We rise by helping each other.
Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ @Skepticallefty Evidence-based atheist leftist (he/him) Producer, host, and co-host of 4 podcasts @skeptarchy @skpoliticspod and @AthopeMarie
Damien Marie AtHope (“At Hope”) Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist. Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Poet, Philosopher, Advocate, Activist, Psychology, and Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Historian.
Damien is interested in: Freedom, Liberty, Justice, Equality, Ethics, Humanism, Science, Atheism, Antiteism, Antireligionism, Ignosticism, Left-Libertarianism, Anarchism, Socialism, Mutualism, Axiology, Metaphysics, LGBTQI, Philosophy, Advocacy, Activism, Mental Health, Psychology, Archaeology, Social Work, Sexual Rights, Marriage Rights, Woman’s Rights, Gender Rights, Child Rights, Secular Rights, Race Equality, Ageism/Disability Equality, Etc. And a far-leftist, “Anarcho-Humanist.”
I am not a good fit in the atheist movement that is mostly pro-capitalist, I am anti-capitalist. Mostly pro-skeptic, I am a rationalist not valuing skepticism. Mostly pro-agnostic, I am anti-agnostic. Mostly limited to anti-Abrahamic religions, I am an anti-religionist.
To me, the “male god” seems to have either emerged or become prominent around 7,000 years ago, whereas the now favored monotheism “male god” is more like 4,000 years ago or so. To me, the “female goddess” seems to have either emerged or become prominent around 11,000-10,000 years ago or so, losing the majority of its once prominence around 2,000 years ago due largely to the now favored monotheism “male god” that grow in prominence after 4,000 years ago or so.
My Thought on the Evolution of Gods?
Animal protector deities from old totems/spirit animal beliefs come first to me, 13,000/12,000 years ago, then women as deities 11,000/10,000 years ago, then male gods around 7,000/8,000 years ago. Moralistic gods around 5,000/4,000 years ago, and monotheistic gods around 4,000/3,000 years ago.
Damien Marie AtHope (Said as “At” “Hope”)/(Autodidact Polymath but not good at math):
Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist, Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Jeweler, Poet, “autodidact” Philosopher, schooled in Psychology, and “autodidact” Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Pre-Historian (Knowledgeable in the range of: 1 million to 5,000/4,000 years ago). I am an anarchist socialist politically. Reasons for or Types of Atheism
My Website, My Blog, & Short-writing or Quotes, My YouTube, Twitter: @AthopeMarie, and My Email: damien.marie.athope@gmail.com