Fibonacci sequence as scientific evidence of a creator?

Damien, what do you say to people who try to use things like the Fibonacci sequence as scientific evidence of a creator, as I was told its Gods Fingerprint→ The Fibonacci Sequence – Golden Ratio? So my responce, well the “Fibonacci Sequence” – is Math, and like all math they explain factors in or of nature but they are descriptive of occurrence or observation they don’t tell you a thing like magic created them and to say so is both a science and math ignorance, because magic is evident nowhere is nature and every believed magic has been shown to be only nature devoid of anything magic. if the term god is no different than nature devoid of magic then its use is a unwarranted redundancy as we more justifiably can call it nature letting the god theory be a thing of child stories where such nonsense belongs. According to Donald E. Simanek in an article: “Fibonacci Flim-Flam”  Fibonacci Foolishness: a search of the internet, or your local library, will convince you that the Fibonacci series has attracted a lunatic fringe of Fibonacci fanatics who look for mysticism in numbers and in nature. You will find fantastic claims: The “golden rectangle” is the “most beautiful” rectangle, and was deliberately used by artists in arranging picture elements within their paintings. (You’d think that they’d always use golden rectangle frames, but they didn’t.) The patterns based on the Fibonacci numbers, the golden ratio and the golden rectangle are those most pleasing to human perception. Mozart used φ in composing music. (He liked number games, but there’s no good evidence that he ever deliberately used φ...