ref

430,000 years ago, Sima de los Huesos, “Pit of Bones”, Atapuerca, Spain, seeming evidence of intentional storing of 28 individuals in a cave chamber pit (a symbolic pseudo-womb?) and a reddish quartzite tool found with the bodies, seems like a kind of ritual funeral offering in this possibly early cemetery. Fossil remains of 430,000-400,000-years-old 28 individuals, 6,500 bone fragments, and 500 teeth, in one of several important sections of the Cueva Mayor-Cueva del Silo cave system in north-central Spain. The bone pit is at the bottom of the cave, beneath an abrupt vertical shaft measuring between 6.5-13 feet in diameter, and located about .1/3 of a mile in down a 42.5 ft shaft and it is possibly an expression of mortuary practices. ref

“The Sima de los Huesos hominins are a 430,000 year old population of “pre-Neanderthals” from the archeological site of Atapuerca, Spain. They are in the “Neanderthal clade” but fall outside of Homo neanderthalensis. When first published in 1993, these 29 individuals represented about 80% of the human fossil record of the Middle Pleistocene. They preserve every bone in the human body, and the unprecedented completeness of the remains sheds light on Neanderthal evolution, the classification of contemporary fossils, and the range of variation that could exist in a single Middle Pleistocene population. Exhumation of the Sima de los Huesos hominins began in the 1980s, under the direction of Emiliano Aguirre and later Juan Luis Arsuaga, Eudald Carbonell, and José María Bermúdez de Castro.” ref

“As a pre-Neanderthal population, the Sima de los Huesos hominins display a mosaic of classic Neanderthal traits (apomorphies) as well as more archaic traits (plesiomorphies). Like in Neanderthals, the brow ridges are inflated, but the skull is not as robust in its rear and has a pointed “house-like” profile instead of the rounded “bomb-like” profile. Brain volume averages 1,241 cc (75.7 cu in), on the lower end of the Neanderthal range of variation. The teeth are Neanderthal-like, with shovel-shaped incisors and taurodontism, but differ in tooth cusp morphology. The chest and waist are broad and robust like in Neanderthals, but the limbs are longer. They may have been overall large-bodied like other archaic humans, with dimensions of about 170 cm (5 ft 7 in) and 90 kg (200 lb) for both males and females.” ref

“The Sima de los Huesos (“bone pit”) is a chamber inside the Cueva Mayor – Cueva Silo cave complex at Atapuerca and may have been a natural trap that creatures fell into — especially the cave bear Ursus deningeri. The Sima de los Huesos hominins may have, instead, been intentionally deposited into the pit by other humans, based on the quality of preservation, and the predominance of adolescents and young adults over children and elderly (catastrophic mortality profile), who were all buried at about the same time. One individual may have been murdered with a blunt tool. Some individuals with severe health issues survived for quite some time, suggesting group care. Many individuals, especially adolescents, present several metabolic and malnutritional diseases altogether consistent with insufficient fat reserves during hibernation, which may have lasted four months.” ref

“This population was producing Acheulean stone tools, as well as an industry seemingly transitioning into the typically-Neanderthal Mousterian culture. They used these tools in butchering, as well as in hide- and woodworking in combination with the mouth as a third hand. The Sima de los Huesos hominins were buried with a single, large Acheulean handaxe, possibly a grave good with symbolic significance. Symbolic thought could indicate the use of an early form of language. They may have been efficient hunters — possibly outcompeting local cave hyenas — pursuing deer, rhinoceros, horse, bison, and (more sporadically) cave lion in an open woodland environment. They were likely eating roots regularly and habitually squatted. They probably were not using fire.” ref

“In a 1993 preliminary report of the human fossil discoveries from Sima de los Huesos (at the time about 700 fossils representing the entire skeleton), Arsuaga and colleagues noted the many distinctly Neanderthal traits (apomorphies), and characterized the material as an early stage in Neanderthal evolution. When the Sima de los Huesos fossils were discovered, Middle Pleistocene European and African fossils were usually classified as Homo heidelbergensis, a wide-ranging species which was considered the last common ancestor of modern humans and Neanderthals. Arsuaga and colleagues instead believed Europe was more isolated from Africa, and placed the 1 million year old Homo antecessor (from the Gran Dolina) as the last common ancestor. They further believed that every Middle Pleistocene European fossil was part of a single population (H. heidelbergensis) ancestral to Neanderthals.” ref 

“In 2002, British physical anthropologist Chris Stringer instead suggested classifying the Sima de los Huesos hominins as archaic Neanderthals but conceded they could be an extremely late H. heidelbergensis group. In 2011, Arsuaga and colleagues failed to identify Neanderthal apomorphies in the holotype specimen of H. heidelbergensis — the jawbone Mauer 1 — and questioned the applicability of heidelbergensis to more derived specimens (with Neanderthal apomorphies). In 2012, Stringer reaffirmed that the Sima de los Huesos hominins are much more derived than other Middle Pleistocene specimens (including Mauer 1), and should be moved from H. heidelbergensis to H. neanderthalensis. In 2014, Arsuaga and colleagues agreed with Stringer — recognizing two distinct groups in Middle Pleistocene Europe — but were unsure whether species or subspecies distinction from H. neanderthalensis was more appropriate.” ref 

“In 2014, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was extracted from Femur XIII, which suggested that this individual shares a closer common ancestor with Central Asian Denisovans (the sister group of Neanderthals) than with Neanderthals. In 2016, nuclear DNA (nDNA) analysis instead concluded that the Sima de los Huesos hominins are more closely related to (but are not) Neanderthals. Because mtDNA is inherited from mother to child, the Sima de los Huesos hominins may carry the ancestral Neanderthal/Denisovan (“Neandersovan”) mtDNA lineage, which was replaced in Neanderthals by interbreeding with African migrants sometime later.” ref

“Further discoveries of complete mandibles at the Sima de los Huesos indicate clear distinction from Mauer 1. While the Sima de los Huesos cranial and mandibular anatomy has developed most of the Neanderthal apomorphies (the earliest appearance for many of them in the fossil record), the rest of the skeleton retains many ancestral features (plesiomorphies), and nDNA indicates that they are a distinct group. They are, nonetheless, firmly nested in the “Neanderthal clade“. Their anatomy also suggests that many Neanderthal apomorphies evolved by the mid-Middle Pleistocene, and the rest appeared late near the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, maybe associated with the full speciation of H. neanderthalensis.” ref

“The Sima de los Huesos hominins can be grouped as “pre-Neanderthals”, which can also include specimens from Montamaurin-La Niche, Pontnewydd, Steinheim, Swanscombe, and Aroeira. This group may ultimately descend from a Near Eastern source population which dispersed across Europe in the mid-Middle Pleistocene — maybe the same one represented at the contemporaneous Israeli Qesem cave, which is dentally similar to the Sima de los Huesos hominins. The timing might coincide with the end of a major glaciation event during Marine Isotope Stage 12 (the Elster/Mindel/Anglian glaciation) roughly 450,000 years ago, during the warm interglacial period of Marine Isotope Stage 11. These “pre-Neanderthals” give way to “early Neanderthals” by the end of Marine Isotope Stage 7 (the Penultimate Glacial Period). “Early Neanderthals” are differentiated by a combination of both derived and “incipient” Neanderthal traits, and are succeeded by “late” or “classic Neanderthals” by the end of Marine Isotope Stage 5e (the Last Interglacial).” ref

“It is possible that the Sima de los Huesos hominins were speaking with some early form of language, especially considering the evidence of intentional burial and symbolic thinking. The Sima de los Huesos hominins had a modern humanlike hyoid bone (which supports the tongue), but this trait can exist without language and humanlike speech capacity. Judging by dental striations, they seem to have been predominantly right-handed, and handedness is related to the lateralisation of brain function, typically associated with language processing in modern humans.” ref

“The middle ear bones are comparable to Neanderthals and modern humans, maybe suggesting they could distinguish the higher frequencies necessary to discern speech (2–4 kHz). Still, the functional anatomy of the ear suggests that the Sima de los Huesos hominins had different hearing capacities than Neanderthals and modern humans. Like chimpanzees, the ear canal is long, and the eardrum and oval window are small and at a low angle. Uniquely, the tympanic cavity (which contains the middle ear bones) and aditus are large. The cochlea (which affects hearing) is more constricted than in Neanderthals in the first turn (of about three turns), reminiscent of chimpanzees. Like in Neanderthals and modern humans, the third turn is short but is more strongly curved.” ref

“Crania 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 17 display several perimortem fractures (injured around the time of death). These fractures may have originated while falling down the shaft — not necessarily while they were alive but at least near the time of death. Only 4% of the long bone material presents perimortem fracturing, and they lack any major injuries. American archeologist Erik Trinkaus noticed a similar pattern in Neanderthals, and suggested individuals who could not walk or keep up with a group while moving between cave sites were left behind. If true, then only individuals without major trauma to the lower limbs would be found at cave sites (survivor bias). It is unclear if this can be applied here. The only pathological foot specimen is a fourth metatarsal (AT-534) which presents a periosteal reaction to presumably a march fracture, a minor injury common in barefoot runners.” ref

“Cranium 17 presents two nearly identical, connected, rectangular perimortem depression fractures on the left frontal squama (Trauma 1 below and Trauma 2 above). The injuries are angled in acutely at different trajectories, respectively 32.5°–44.8° and 49.2°. The injuries are consistent with powerful blunt force trauma, passing through the bone into the brain. The identical shape (even baring the same notch in the same position) suggests that they were caused by the same object, and their different trajectories suggests that they were caused by two separate actions; so it is improbable this individual got these fractures from simply falling into the Sima de los Huesos, or being struck by randomly falling limestone blocks. They may be the result of an intentional attack by another human with a tool in the right hand, resulting in her death.” ref

“Similarly, there is evidence that the Sima de los Huesos hominins were predominantly right-handed; and in forensic medicine, multiple blows to the face above the hat brim is normally interpreted as an assault (“hat brim rule”). This further means that the individual represented by Cranium 17 was already dead before dropping into the Sima de los Huesos, and — lacking any carnivore damage — was most likely interred by other humans. The perimortem fracturing on Cranium 5 on the frontal and left parietal, as well as Cranium 11 on the left parietal, may have also originated from interpersonal violence. No defensive injuries on the arms have been discovered. Interpersonal violence in the fossil record is difficult to demonstrate. As of 2015, the only other specimens that bear some strong evidence of this in the human fossil record is the Neanderthal Shanidar 3 and the modern human Sunghir 1.” ref

“The Cueva Mayor – Cueva Silo complex is the main cave system of the Sierra de Atapuerca, extending over 3 km (1.9 mi) and three distinct levels — Sima de los Huesos at the lowest one. There are 4 entrances: Portalón (the entrance to Cueva Mayor) and Galería de las Estatuas in the first level, Sima del Elefante in the second, and Cueva del Silo in the third. Cueva del Silo is the nearest entrance to Sima de los Huesos, via the spacious Sala de los Cíclopes. The Sima de los Huesos is 30 m (98 ft) underground, and 500 m (1,600 ft) from the entrance to Cueva Mayor. It runs 18 m (59 ft) at longest east-to-west, with a mostly horizontal segment (Sima Top), a 30° ramp (Sima Ramp) running down 9 m (30 ft), and another horizontal segment (Sima de los Huesos proper). The cave infill is divided into 12 lithostratigraphic units (LU).” ref

“The ramp has three test pits where fossils were collected: Alta (SRA), Media (SRM), and Baja (SRB). There are three chimneys: Chimney 1 between Alta and Sima Top, Chimney 2 between Media and Alta, and Chimney 3 above Sima de los Huesos proper. Only Chimney 2 is open, which leads into the Sala de los Cíclopes to the west and a low inclined conduit to the east. It is the only entrance. Most of the human and carnivore fossils come from a 4 m × 8 m (13 ft × 26 ft) section on the north side near the base of the ramp (on Sima de los Huesos proper) in LU-6. Additionally, over 100 human fossils were found along the ramp. A few human fossils were recovered from LU-7 where LU-6 had mostly or completely eroded away, which were probably reworked from LU-6 (they moved from LU-6 to LU-7).” ref

“There are many peculiarities in the taphonomy of the Sima de los Huesos hominins which could suggest that they were intentionally buried by other humans, instead of falling down a natural pitfall as in the case of the many cave bears at the site. About half of the Sima de los Huesos material is represented by adolescents/young adults between 15 and 18 years of age. Infants (below 2 years) are absent, and children below 10 are unusually rare given the high infant mortality rate of recent hunter-gatherer societies. The few individuals who seem to have surpassed 30 do not seem to have survived into their 40s based on the degree of tooth wearing. The overrepresentation of young adults in their prime (catastrophic mortality profile) instead of children and elderly (attritional mortality profile) suggests that the accumulation does not represent multiple generations which lived and died in the cave but rather a single high-mortality event. A lack of stone tools also suggests this was not a living space.” ref 

“Because the entire skeleton (including fragile pieces) is extremely well represented by numerous different individuals all found in the same narrow layer of sediment, the bodies were most likely deposited in the Sima de los Huesos completely intact at around the same time. They also by-and-large lack carnivore damage. Because Cranium 17 presents two identical fatal injuries (therefore presumably caused by the same hard object), this individual was likely already killed — maybe by another human — before being deposited in the Sima de los Huesos. Additionally, a single Acheulean handaxe (nicknamed “Excalibur”) was deposited with the bodies, the only lithic artifact found at the site. It is made of high-quality veined quartzite, which was rarely used in the region, and was quite large at 155 mm × 97 mm × 58 mm (6.1 in × 3.8 in × 2.3 in) and 685 g (1.5 lb). It lacks any indication of wearing or usage, unless it was scrubbed away by sand over time. In the context of intentional burial, Carbonell and colleagues suggested it was left as a grave good — an early example of complex symbolic thinking.” ref

“No stone tools were found in the Sima de los Huesos, as it was probably never inhabited. The Galería and Gran Dolina sites, on the other hand, preserve expansive lithic assemblages. Knapping techniques evolved significantly over time, but in general the Galería assemblage fits within the Acheulean industry, a Lower Paleolithic technology. TD10.1 could represent the transition to the Mousterian industry, a Middle Paleolithic technology associated with Neanderthals. In Galería, there is little debitage (wastage), suggesting the tools were predominantly made off-site, with only quick, simple retouching happening onsite. This suggests that the site was used as a temporary base camp.” ref

“In GIIa (the older part), the tool assemblage is mostly represented by simple lithic flakes, followed by retouched tools, and unmodified cobble. Retouched tools were usually made using chert and quartz, and large cutting tools (handaxes and cleavers) were predominantly made from quartzite. Unusually, cobble seems to have been used to shape the larger tools. In GIIb, larger tools (which require more planning) were produced more frequently from pre-prepared flakes instead of cobble, and quartzite is often replaced by sandstone, chert, and limestone. It is possible GIIb represents an entirely new group from GIIa, with different tool-making traditions. These trends continue into GIII, but the knappers stop shaping the base of the tool. In GIII, fewer and more efficient strikes were used, cleaving off bigger flakes from a core but making the end product less standardized. The tools are also generally shorter and wider.” ref

“TD10.1 preserves over 20,000 lithics, one of the archeologically richest sites in the Sierra de Atapuerca. This likely represents long-term occupation sequences, in addition to some short-term ones. Similarly, there is a predominance of flakes and debitage over large cutting tools, as well as a complete chaîne opératoire (all debitage and products made during the tool-making process are present). TD10.1 is otherwise comparable to GIII. Tools were mainly made of chert but sandstone and quartzite became more popular over time. Some chert seems to have been collected from a source 10 km (6.2 mi) away, an unexpectedly long distance to obtain resources for such an early group of humans. These tools were probably used extensively for butchering, as well as hide- and woodworking activity. Similarly, dental wearing suggests that every individual was commonly using the mouth as a third hand to bite onto probably animal skin or vegetable fibers with the front teeth, while cutting the material with a tool.” ref

“Knapping techniques are generally unstandardized, but the gradual shift in raw materials caused the longitudinal method (striking a lithic core parallel to its long axis, better suited for harder quartzite) to become less common, in favor of the orthogonal method (striking a core perpendicular to its long axis). In Galería, this gradually gets replaced by the centripetal method (striking starts at the edge of the core and works inward) in combination with the longitudinal method. In TD10.1, the centripetal and discoidal methods (associated with the Middle Paleolithic Levallois technique, exercising more control over the final shape) become more popular. The Sima de los Huesos hominins were probably not using fire; instead physiologically withstanding the cold climate with their large body size, and presumably high activity levels and metabolic heat. High quality evidence of fire usage in Europe appears after an interglacial during Marine Isotope Stage 9 (roughly 340,000 years ago).” ref

refref

ref

“Map showing the known range of Neanderthals.” ref

ref, ref

“Prehistory in the Iberian peninsula begins with the arrival of the first Homo genus representatives from Africa, 1.5 to 1.25 million years ago.” ref

Sima de los Huesos human remains: over 6,500 human fossils, representing about 28 individuals, have been recovered in the Sima de los Huesos (‘Pit of the Bones’) in Atapuerca in northern Spain. The human remains consist of jumbled partial or nearly complete skeletons, mainly those of adolescents and young adults. The Sima skeletons were previously claimed to representHomoheidelbergensisand be about 600,000 years old. However, they are now dated to about 430,000 years ago. The evidence suggests they were very early Neanderthals – they show clear affinities to subsequent Neanderthals in details of the skull, face, jaws, and especially their teeth. Ancient DNA from the remains also places them firmly on the Neanderthal genetic lineage, in line with their morphology.” ref

ref

“Meet the frail, small-brained people who first trekked out of Africa. Fossils at site in Georgia paint startling picture of humanity’s first migrants.” ref

I think that it is most likely that an arcane Homo (from Latin homō ‘human’), the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens/Modern humans, split off of Homo Erectus in Northwest Africa sometime from 2 million to 750,000 years ago, then moved sometime after 750,000 to 550,000 years ago moving into Spain in Europe where it split into the genetics known as (Archaic HumansHomo Denisovans and Homo Neandertalensis.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Homo erectus to the common ancestor split of Homo sapiens, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisovans around 750,000 to 550,000 years ago, as well as the common ancestor split of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo Denisovans around 473,000 to 381,000 years ago.

“Homo erectus to the common ancestor split of Homo sapiens, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo Denisovans around 750,000 to 550,000 years ago, as well as the common ancestor split of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo Denisovans around 473,000 to 381,000 years ago.”

AI Overview: The statement is broadly correct, though specific dates are estimations. The common ancestor of Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans split from other archaic humans, possibly including Homo erectus, between approximately 750,000 and 550,000 years ago. Later, the Neanderthal and Denisovan lineages diverged from each other, with recent genetic evidence suggesting this split occurred around 473,000 to 381,000 years ago. ref, ref, ref

ref, ref, ref

The speciation of modern humans and Neanderthals using the Sima de los Huesos remains

“Homo heidelbergensis is thought to have descended from African Homo erectus — sometimes classified as Homo ergaster — during the first early expansions of hominins out of Africa beginning roughly 2 million years ago. Those that dispersed across Europe and stayed in Africa evolved into Homo heidelbergensis or speciated into Homo heidelbergensis in Europe and “Homo rhodesiensis” in Africa, and those that dispersed across East Asia evolved into Homo erectus. The exact derivation from an ancestor species is obfuscated by a long gap in the human fossil record near the end of the Early Pleistocene. In 2016, Antonio Profico and colleagues suggested that 875,000-year-old skull materials from the Gombore II site of the Melka Kunture Formation, Ethiopia, represent a transitional morph between Homo ergaster and Homo heidelbergensis, and thus postulated that Homo heidelbergensis originated in Africa instead of Europe.” ref

“According to genetic analysis, the Last Comon Ancestor of modern humans and Neanderthal split into a modern human line, and a Neanderthal/Denisovan line, and the latter later split into Neanderthal and Denisovans. According to nuclear DNA analysis, the 430,000-year-old SH humans are more closely related to Neanderthals than Denisovans (and that the Neanderthal/Denisovan, and thus the modern human/Neanderthal split, had already occurred), suggesting the modern human/Neanderthal Last Comon Ancestor had existed long before many European specimens typically assigned to Homo heidelbergensis did, such as the Arago and Petralona materials.” ref

“In 1997, Spanish archaeologist José María Bermúdez de Castro, Arsuaga, and colleagues described the roughly million-year-old  Homo antecessor from Gran Dolina, Sierra de Atapuerca, and suggested supplanting this species in the place of Homo heidelbergensis for the Last Comon Ancestor between modern humans and Neanderthals, with Homo heidelbergensis descending from it and being a strictly European species ancestral to only Neanderthals. They later recanted. In 2020, Dutch molecular palaeoanthropologist Frido Welker and colleagues analyzed ancient proteins collected from an Homo antecessor tooth found that it was a member of a sister lineage to the Last Comon Ancestor rather than being the Last Comon Ancestor itself (that is, Homo heidelbergensis did not derive from Homo antecessor).” ref

“Human dispersal beyond 45°N seems to have been quite limited during the Lower Palaeolithic, with evidence of short-lived dispersals northward beginning after a million years ago. Beginning 700,000 years ago, more permanent populations seem to have persisted across the line coinciding with the spread of hand axe technology across Europe, possibly associated with the dispersal of Homo heidelbergensis and behavioral shifts to cope with the cold climate. Such occupation becomes much more frequent after 500,000 years ago.” ref

“In 2023, a genomics analysis of over 3,000 living individuals indicated that Homo sapiens’ ancestral population was reduced to less than 1,300 individuals between 800,000 and 900,000 years ago. Prof Giorgio Manzi, an anthropologist at Sapienza University of Rome, suggested that this bottleneck could have triggered the evolution of Homo heidelbergensis.” ref

ref, ref, ref

Pre-Animism: Portable Rock Art Figure Stones

Neanderthal figure stone, Fontmaure, France, around 150,000 to 50,000 years ago. refref

Hamburg, Germany around 200,000 years ago with the common primal theme of one eye open, one eye closed or partly closed. ref

Ancient handaxe figure stone Niger, around 800,000 to 300,000 years ago. ref

“Right eye open, left eye missing”a common theme in Paleolithic art motif found in the Netherlands context around 300,000 years ago. ref

refrefrefrefref

ref, ref, ref, ref

Pre-Animism Emergence is No Accident at Least by 300,000-year Ago Was Aided by Evolution

 Pre-Animism: “animistic superstitionism”, I surmise, leads to the animistic somethingism, or animistic supernatralism is presented in today’s religions and is a representation of general Animism that is at least 100,000 years old. ref

 The Blue on the outside references the size difference to modern human brains and the inside to illustrate regions with surface size increase associated with this gradual shape changes. ref

 300,000-year-old Moroccan, North African skulls look shockingly that of Modern Humans and these skulls hold a combination of advanced and archaic features suggesting that these skulls may represent the very root of our Modern Human species. This is further supported in how all Homo sapiens ever found even far beyond Africa trace their ancestral linkages to the Moroccan, North African skulls or at least point as it where in that direction. And seemingly Homo sapiens could have been living across Africa and sem9ingly engaging in extensive movement, which could have involved exchange both in ideas, technology as well as even genetics. ref

 300,000-year-old wolf tooth pendant from Repolust Cave, Austria. ref

ref

Homo Naledi and an Intentional Cemetery “Pre-Animism” dating to around 250,000 years ago?

 To me, it seems likely Homo Naledi did have an intentional cemetery as seen at Dinaledi Chamber, in South African, thus “Pre-Animism” dating to around 250,000 years ago. The odd cache of bones from several Homo naledi, where recovered from a deep chamber in a South African cave, seeming to express a cemetery far from the cave entrance, accessible only through a narrow, difficult passage impossible place to live, and not by accident this purposeful cave chamber was most likely kind of graveyard. ref

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref ,ref ,ref ,ref ,ref, ref, ref 

Homo Naledi

Homo Naledi is a species of archaic human discovered in the Rising Star Cave, Cradle of Humankind, South Africa dating to the Middle Pleistocene 335,000–236,000 years ago. The initial discovery comprises 1,550 specimens, representing 737 different elements, and at least 15 different individuals. Despite this exceptionally high number of specimens, their classification with other Homo remains unclear.” ref

“Along with similarities to contemporary Homo, they share several characteristics with the ancestral Australopithecus and early Homo as well (mosaic anatomy), most notably a small cranial capacity of 465–610 cm3 (28.4–37.2 cu in), compared to 1,270–1,330 cm3 (78–81 cu in) in modern humans. They are estimated to have averaged 143.6 cm (4 ft 9 in) in height and 39.7 kg (88 lb) in weight, yielding a small encephalization quotient of 4.5. Nonetheless, Homo Naledi’s brain anatomy seems to have been similar to contemporary Homo, which could indicate equatable cognitive complexity. The persistence of small-brained humans for so long in the midst of bigger-brained contemporaries revises the previous conception that a larger brain would necessarily lead to an evolutionary advantage, and their mosaic anatomy greatly expands the known range of variation for the genus.” ref

“Homo Naledi anatomy indicates that, though they were capable of long-distance travel with a humanlike stride and gait, they were more arboreal than other Homo, better adapted to climbing and suspensory behavior in trees than endurance running. Tooth anatomy suggests consumption of gritty foods covered in particulates such as dust or dirt. Though they have not been associated with stone tools or any indication of material culture, they appear to have been dextrous enough to produce and handle tools, and likely manufactured Early or Middle Stone Age industries. It has also been controversially postulated that these individuals were given funerary rites, and were carried into and placed in the chamber.” ref 

I Believe Archaeology not Religion’s Myths

I fully enjoy the value (axiology) of archaeology (empirical evidence from fact or artifacts at a site) is knowledge (epistemology) of the past, adding to our anthropology (evidence from cultures both the present and past) intellectual (rational) assumptions of the likely reality of actual events from time past.

On the other hand, you have religions (unproven/disproven conspiracies of reality) supported by myths (collection of reality questionable stories) inaccurate accounts of the past or tails to establish thinking or behaviors, supporting faith (non-rationality, if seen as proven reality) in some unreal belief, behavior, or creative fiction of nonevents or actual events.

I say it is all connected, religion and culture for at least up to 100,000 years ago, maybe up to 300,000 years ago, and everyone said, “Damien you are crazy to think that.” Oh really???
We are just not that special…

400,000 Years Old Sociocultural Evolution


400,000 Years Ago – Qesem Cave (Israel), found evidence seem to indicate around this time elephants once the main, as well as large and somewhat easy sore of food, disappeared, prompting a change in hunting to that of deer, a smaller and harder to obtain sores of food. At the same time, other evidence seems to indicate they regularly started cooking food, then smashing the bones to extract the marrow, even more, resourceful they used the bone fragments to create tools.
 
Amazingly also found was Hominidae teeth which seems to expose a kind of missing link more advanced than Homo erectus and precursors of Homo sapiens and the Neanderthals. Moreover, the teeth found seem to provide evidence for the existence of a type of link to Homo sapiens thus modern humans, 200,000 years earlier than those currently found in Africa, and may coincide or be yet another unknown like the genetics that showed that several men in Africa have unique, divergent Y-chromosomes that trace back to an ancient man who lived between 581,000 to 237,000 years ago as addressed before.
 
But as amazing as that is do not forget that we actually all evolved from fish and now modern genetics has also confirmed an ancient relationship between fish fins and human hands. And even more amazing biologists have confirmed the evolution of the central nervous system demonstrating that nerve cell centralization begin in multicellular animals tracing back to the diffuse nerve net of simple and original lower animals like the sea anemone. The sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (simple sack-like body with no skeleton and just one body orifice) like corals and jellyfish is a member of the Cnidaria family, which is over 700 million years old.
 
References
 
Ghose, T. (2013). Genetic ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve’ uncovered. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/38613-genetic-adam-and-eve-uncovered.html
 
 
Science Daily (2014). Modern genetics confirm an ancient relationship between fins and hands. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141222165441.htm
 

Timeline of Environmental History

680,000 Years Ago – Present – Climate change was an influential factor in the human evolution, human migration (available resources), and religion evolution. The weather patterns are the following:

  1. 680,000 to 620,000 years: glaciers forms (time of extreme cold),
  2. 620,000 to 455-410,000 years: glaciers diminish (time of milder weather)
  3. 455-410,000 to 380-300,000 years: glaciers forms (time of extreme cold)
  4. 380-300,000 to 200,000 years: glaciers diminish (time of milder weather)
  5. 200,000 to 130-125,000 years: glaciers forms (time of extreme cold)
  6. 130-125,000 to 110,000 years: glaciers diminish (time of milder weather)
  7. 110-70,000 to 12-10,000 years: glaciers forms (time of extreme cold)
  8. 10,000 years to the present: glaciers diminish (time of milder weather)
  9. 10,000 -9,800 years ago Erdalen Event, climatic variability, glacier activity in Norway, as well as a cold event in China.
  10. 8.2 (8,200 years ago) kiloyear event a sudden decrease in global temperatures
  11. 5.9 (5,900 years ago) kiloyear event one of the most intense aridification events during the Holocene.
  12. 4.2 (4,200 years ago) kiloyear event one of the most severe climatic events of the Holocene period.
  13. 2,800 years ago Late Bronze Age collapse may have been triggered by drought in the Eastern Mediterranean.
  14. 1,400 years ago Mass Migration Period, of peoples like GermanicHunnicSlavic, and others moving into the territory of the then declining Roman Empire.
  15. 1500 AD  Little Ice Age

Dramatic climate swings created powerful environmental pressures, many animal species were driven to extinction by the advancing and retreating ice ages and human evolution was likely affected strongly by this as well. Humanity survived primarily by becoming more intelligent as well as adaptable such as increasing proficiency at clothing, shelter, hunting, and foraging, which required inventing more sophisticated skills and tools. This allowed us to develop new cultural technology to deal with cold environments and changing food sources, especially during the last 250,000 years. These changes were essential for our survival but also would have aided in elements needed in socio-cultural-religious transformations or evolution.

In general, the changes in climate were also a factor of people changing as well as a motivation for people to move and disperse all over the prehistoric world. Although climate change is a big factor, it is not the only one nor was moving the only choice utilized. Depends on the peoples, their various ways of life and ideologies some adapted strategies rather than moving, some changed or merged kinship in order to facilitate reciprocal exchange, some likely used superstitionism or later supernaturalism ideas to connect, change or transition social structures whether they moved or not and others may have resorted to violence and raiding.

Reference

O’Neil, D. (2013). Climate change and human evolution. Retrieved from http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_3.htm


If you are a religious believer, may I remind you that faith in the acquisition of knowledge is not a valid method worth believing in. Because, what proof is “faith”, of anything religion claims by faith, as many people have different faith even in the same religion?

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refref

Wonderwerk Cave is an archaeological site, in the Kuruman Hills, situated between Danielskuil and Kuruman in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa, dating suggests that basal sediment entered the cave some 2 million years ago. Evidence within Wonderwerk cave has been called the oldest controlled fire with what is thought to be Fire-Making by about 1.7 Million Years Ago. Moreover, evidence for fire-making ranges from the end of the Later Stone Age to the very base of the Acheulean. That discovery is seen to be in accord with findings from four other regional sites, which together provide evidence that can be construed as support for fire-making over almost the same time span.” refref

“A handaxe (or hand ax) is a prehistoric stone tool with two faces that is the longest-used tool in human history. Hand axe tools were possibly used to butcher animals; to dig for tubers, animals, and water; to chop wood and remove tree bark; and/or process vegetal materials. Other scholars have proposed that hand axes were used to throw at prey; for a ritual or social purpose; or possibly as a source for flake tools. Moreover, No academic consensus describes their use, but it is commonly agreed that the hand axe was some form of unhafted all-purpose tool. The pioneers of Palaeolithic tool studies first suggested that bifaces were used as axes despite the fact that they have a sharp border all around. Other uses seem to show that hand axes were a multi-functional tool, leading some to describe them as the “Acheulean Swiss Army knife“. Other academics have suggested that the hand axe was simply a byproduct of being used as a core to make other tools, a weapon, and/or was perhaps used ritually.” ref

“Evidence for unusual symbolic activity in Wonderwerk date to around 400,000–500,000 years ago, which predates Middle Stone Age sites like Blombos Cave deposits that currently date at between c. 100,000 and 70,000 years ago.” refref

ref

Acheulean Stone Tools

Acheulean tools date to about 1.76 million to 130,000 years ago, are typically found with Homo erectus remains, and were produced during the Lower Palaeolithic era across Africa and much of West Asia, South Asia, and Europe, and are typically found with Homo erectus remains. It is thought that Acheulean technologies developed from the more primitive Oldowan technology associated with Homo habilis. ref 

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

 Homo erectus Invented “Modern” Living?

750,000 years ago at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov in northern Israel, is found some of the earliest known evidence of social organization, communication, and divided living and working spaces—all considered hallmarks of modern human behavior. The former hunter-gatherer encampment dates back as far as 750,000 years ago, and must have been built by Homo erectus or another ancestral human species. ref

Homo heidelbergensis likely emerged at least 600,000 years ago, left Africa between 300,000 to 400,000 years ago and is also believed to have lived in huts, utilised fire, use stone-tipped spears, and there is some evidence that they may have buried their dead which if confirmed, thought by some doubted, would be an indication of symbolic / abstract thought. Red ochre has also been found at some Homo heidelbergensis sites. The Homo heidelbergensis that remained in Africa would later evolve into Homo sapiens approximately 130,000 years ago. ref

500,000 years ago Chichibu, north of Tokyo Homo erectus semi-permanent living shelter. It consists of what appear to be 10 post holes, forming two irregular pentagons which may be the remains of two huts. Thirty stone tools were also found scattered around the site. ref

400,000 years ago there is evidence of twelve huts found in Nice, France (the question is who made this, and the ideas rang from Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis to even possibly Neanderthals as all three are believed to make and live in Hut shelters at least at sometimes). They where oval shelters ranged from 26 feet to 49 feet in length and were between 13 feet and 20 feet wide. They were built of 3-inch in diameter stakes and braced by a ring of stones. Longer poles were set around the perimeter as supports. The huts had hearths and pebble-lined pits and were defined by stake holes. ref

350,000 years ago near Bilzingsleben, East Germany Homo erectus that lived and constructed shelters similar to those of Bushmen in southern Africa. Circular bone and stone foundations were discovered for three huts between 9 and 13 feet across. In the middle of on circle, archaeologist found an elephant tusk, which they speculated was a center post. ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref

Animism: a belief among some indigenous people, young children, or all religious people!

Over 100,000 years ago or so, Southern Africa, in the Land before and the beginning Time of Animism: LINK

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref,  refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref,

Explaining the Earliest Religious Expression, that of Animism (beginning 100,000 to 70,000 years ago?) to Totemism (beginning 30,000 to 3,000 years ago?) in Southern Africa: LINK

My thoughts on Religion Evolution with external links for more info:

“Religion is an Evolved Product” and Yes, Religion is Like Fear Given Wings…

Atheists talk about gods and religions for the same reason doctors talk about cancer, they are looking for a cure, or a firefighter talks about fires because they burn people and they care to stop them. We atheists too often feel a need to help the victims of mental slavery, held in the bondage that is the false beliefs of gods and the conspiracy theories of reality found in religions.

“Understanding Religion Evolution: Animism, Totemism, Shamanism, Paganism & Progressed organized religion”

Understanding Religion Evolution:

“An Archaeological/Anthropological Understanding of Religion Evolution”

It seems ancient peoples had to survived amazing threats in a “dangerous universe (by superstition perceived as good and evil),” and human “immorality or imperfection of the soul” which was thought to affect the still living, leading to ancestor worship. This ancestor worship presumably led to the belief in supernatural beings, and then some of these were turned into the belief in gods. This feeble myth called gods were just a human conceived “made from nothing into something over and over, changing, again and again, taking on more as they evolve, all the while they are thought to be special,” but it is just supernatural animistic spirit-belief perceived as sacred.

 

Quick Evolution of Religion?

Pre-Animism (at least 300,000 years ago) pre-religion is a beginning that evolves into later Animism. So, Religion as we think of it, to me, all starts in a general way with Animism (Africa: 100,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in supernatural powers/spirits), then this is physically expressed in or with Totemism (Europe: 50,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in mythical relationship with powers/spirits through a totem item), which then enlists a full-time specific person to do this worship and believed interacting Shamanism (Siberia/Russia: 30,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in access and influence with spirits through ritual), and then there is the further employment of myths and gods added to all the above giving you Paganism (Turkey: 12,000 years ago) (often a lot more nature-based than most current top world religions, thus hinting to their close link to more ancient religious thinking it stems from). My hypothesis is expressed with an explanation of the building of a theatrical house (modern religions development). Progressed organized religion (Egypt: 5,000 years ago)  with CURRENT “World” RELIGIONS (after 4,000 years ago).

Historically, in large city-state societies (such as Egypt or Iraq) starting around 5,000 years ago culminated to make religion something kind of new, a sociocultural-governmental-religious monarchy, where all or at least many of the people of such large city-state societies seem familiar with and committed to the existence of “religion” as the integrated life identity package of control dynamics with a fixed closed magical doctrine, but this juggernaut integrated religion identity package of Dogmatic-Propaganda certainly did not exist or if developed to an extent it was highly limited in most smaller prehistoric societies as they seem to lack most of the strong control dynamics with a fixed closed magical doctrine (magical beliefs could be at times be added or removed). Many people just want to see developed religious dynamics everywhere even if it is not. Instead, all that is found is largely fragments until the domestication of religion.

Religions, as we think of them today, are a new fad, even if they go back to around 6,000 years in the timeline of human existence, this amounts to almost nothing when seen in the long slow evolution of religion at least around 70,000 years ago with one of the oldest ritual worship. Stone Snake of South Africa: “first human worship” 70,000 years ago. This message of how religion and gods among them are clearly a man-made thing that was developed slowly as it was invented and then implemented peace by peace discrediting them all. Which seems to be a simple point some are just not grasping how devastating to any claims of truth when we can see the lie clearly in the archeological sites.

I wish people fought as hard for the actual values as they fight for the group/clan names political or otherwise they think support values. Every amount spent on war is theft to children in need of food or the homeless kept from shelter.

Here are several of my blog posts on history:

I am not an academic. I am a revolutionary that teaches in public, in places like social media, and in the streets. I am not a leader by some title given but from my commanding leadership style of simply to start teaching everywhere to everyone, all manner of positive education. 

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref 

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Low Gods “Earth” or Tutelary deity and High Gods “Sky” or Supreme deity

“An Earth goddess is a deification of the Earth. Earth goddesses are often associated with the “chthonic” deities of the underworldKi and Ninhursag are Mesopotamian earth goddesses. In Greek mythology, the Earth is personified as Gaia, corresponding to Roman Terra, Indic Prithvi/Bhūmi, etc. traced to an “Earth Mother” complementary to the “Sky Father” in Proto-Indo-European religionEgyptian mythology exceptionally has a sky goddess and an Earth god.” ref

“A mother goddess is a goddess who represents or is a personification of naturemotherhoodfertilitycreationdestruction or who embodies the bounty of the Earth. When equated with the Earth or the natural world, such goddesses are sometimes referred to as Mother Earth or as the Earth Mother. In some religious traditions or movements, Heavenly Mother (also referred to as Mother in Heaven or Sky Mother) is the wife or feminine counterpart of the Sky father or God the Father.” ref

Any masculine sky god is often also king of the gods, taking the position of patriarch within a pantheon. Such king gods are collectively categorized as “sky father” deities, with a polarity between sky and earth often being expressed by pairing a “sky father” god with an “earth mother” goddess (pairings of a sky mother with an earth father are less frequent). A main sky goddess is often the queen of the gods and may be an air/sky goddess in her own right, though she usually has other functions as well with “sky” not being her main. In antiquity, several sky goddesses in ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Near East were called Queen of Heaven. Neopagans often apply it with impunity to sky goddesses from other regions who were never associated with the term historically. The sky often has important religious significance. Many religions, both polytheistic and monotheistic, have deities associated with the sky.” ref

“In comparative mythology, sky father is a term for a recurring concept in polytheistic religions of a sky god who is addressed as a “father”, often the father of a pantheon and is often either a reigning or former King of the Gods. The concept of “sky father” may also be taken to include Sun gods with similar characteristics, such as Ra. The concept is complementary to an “earth mother“. “Sky Father” is a direct translation of the Vedic Dyaus Pita, etymologically descended from the same Proto-Indo-European deity name as the Greek Zeûs Pater and Roman Jupiter and Germanic Týr, Tir or Tiwaz, all of which are reflexes of the same Proto-Indo-European deity’s name, *Dyēus Ph₂tḗr. While there are numerous parallels adduced from outside of Indo-European mythology, there are exceptions (e.g. In Egyptian mythology, Nut is the sky mother and Geb is the earth father).” ref

Tutelary deity

“A tutelary (also tutelar) is a deity or spirit who is a guardian, patron, or protector of a particular place, geographic feature, person, lineage, nation, culture, or occupation. The etymology of “tutelary” expresses the concept of safety and thus of guardianship. In late Greek and Roman religion, one type of tutelary deity, the genius, functions as the personal deity or daimon of an individual from birth to death. Another form of personal tutelary spirit is the familiar spirit of European folklore.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) iKorean shamanismjangseung and sotdae were placed at the edge of villages to frighten off demons. They were also worshiped as deities. Seonangshin is the patron deity of the village in Korean tradition and was believed to embody the SeonangdangIn Philippine animism, Diwata or Lambana are deities or spirits that inhabit sacred places like mountains and mounds and serve as guardians. Such as: Maria Makiling is the deity who guards Mt. Makiling and Maria Cacao and Maria Sinukuan. In Shinto, the spirits, or kami, which give life to human bodies come from nature and return to it after death. Ancestors are therefore themselves tutelaries to be worshiped. And similarly, Native American beliefs such as Tonás, tutelary animal spirit among the Zapotec and Totems, familial or clan spirits among the Ojibwe, can be animals.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) in Austronesian beliefs such as: Atua (gods and spirits of the Polynesian peoples such as the Māori or the Hawaiians), Hanitu (Bunun of Taiwan‘s term for spirit), Hyang (KawiSundaneseJavanese, and Balinese Supreme Being, in ancient Java and Bali mythology and this spiritual entity, can be either divine or ancestral), Kaitiaki (New Zealand Māori term used for the concept of guardianship, for the sky, the sea, and the land), Kawas (mythology) (divided into 6 groups: gods, ancestors, souls of the living, spirits of living things, spirits of lifeless objects, and ghosts), Tiki (Māori mythologyTiki is the first man created by either Tūmatauenga or Tāne and represents deified ancestors found in most Polynesian cultures). ” ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Mesopotamian Tutelary Deities can be seen as ones related to City-States 

“Historical city-states included Sumerian cities such as Uruk and UrAncient Egyptian city-states, such as Thebes and Memphis; the Phoenician cities (such as Tyre and Sidon); the five Philistine city-states; the Berber city-states of the Garamantes; the city-states of ancient Greece (the poleis such as AthensSpartaThebes, and Corinth); the Roman Republic (which grew from a city-state into a vast empire); the Italian city-states from the Middle Ages to the early modern period, such as FlorenceSienaFerraraMilan (which as they grew in power began to dominate neighboring cities) and Genoa and Venice, which became powerful thalassocracies; the Mayan and other cultures of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica (including cities such as Chichen ItzaTikalCopán and Monte Albán); the central Asian cities along the Silk Road; the city-states of the Swahili coastRagusa; states of the medieval Russian lands such as Novgorod and Pskov; and many others.” ref

“The Uruk period (ca. 4000 to 3100 BCE; also known as Protoliterate period) of Mesopotamia, named after the Sumerian city of Uruk, this period saw the emergence of urban life in Mesopotamia and the Sumerian civilization. City-States like Uruk and others had a patron tutelary City Deity along with a Priest-King.” ref

Chinese folk religion, both past, and present, includes myriad tutelary deities. Exceptional individuals, highly cultivated sages, and prominent ancestors can be deified and honored after death. Lord Guan is the patron of military personnel and police, while Mazu is the patron of fishermen and sailors. Such as Tu Di Gong (Earth Deity) is the tutelary deity of a locality, and each individual locality has its own Earth Deity and Cheng Huang Gong (City God) is the guardian deity of an individual city, worshipped by local officials and locals since imperial times.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) in Hinduism, personal tutelary deities are known as ishta-devata, while family tutelary deities are known as Kuladevata. Gramadevata are guardian deities of villages. Devas can also be seen as tutelary. Shiva is the patron of yogis and renunciants. City goddesses include: Mumbadevi (Mumbai), Sachchika (Osian); Kuladevis include: Ambika (Porwad), and Mahalakshmi. In NorthEast India Meitei mythology and religion (Sanamahism) of Manipur, there are various types of tutelary deities, among which Lam Lais are the most predominant ones. Tibetan Buddhism has Yidam as a tutelary deity. Dakini is the patron of those who seek knowledge.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) The Greeks also thought deities guarded specific places: for instance, Athena was the patron goddess of the city of Athens. Socrates spoke of hearing the voice of his personal spirit or daimonion:

You have often heard me speak of an oracle or sign which comes to me … . This sign I have had ever since I was a child. The sign is a voice which comes to me and always forbids me to do something which I am going to do, but never commands me to do anything, and this is what stands in the way of my being a politician.” ref

“Tutelary deities who guard and preserve a place or a person are fundamental to ancient Roman religion. The tutelary deity of a man was his Genius, that of a woman her Juno. In the Imperial era, the Genius of the Emperor was a focus of Imperial cult. An emperor might also adopt a major deity as his personal patron or tutelary, as Augustus did Apollo. Precedents for claiming the personal protection of a deity were established in the Republican era, when for instance the Roman dictator Sulla advertised the goddess Victory as his tutelary by holding public games (ludi) in her honor.” ref

“Each town or city had one or more tutelary deities, whose protection was considered particularly vital in time of war and siege. Rome itself was protected by a goddess whose name was to be kept ritually secret on pain of death (for a supposed case, see Quintus Valerius Soranus). The Capitoline Triad of Juno, Jupiter, and Minerva were also tutelaries of Rome. The Italic towns had their own tutelary deities. Juno often had this function, as at the Latin town of Lanuvium and the Etruscan city of Veii, and was often housed in an especially grand temple on the arx (citadel) or other prominent or central location. The tutelary deity of Praeneste was Fortuna, whose oracle was renowned.” ref

“The Roman ritual of evocatio was premised on the belief that a town could be made vulnerable to military defeat if the power of its tutelary deity were diverted outside the city, perhaps by the offer of superior cult at Rome. The depiction of some goddesses such as the Magna Mater (Great Mother, or Cybele) as “tower-crowned” represents their capacity to preserve the city. A town in the provinces might adopt a deity from within the Roman religious sphere to serve as its guardian, or syncretize its own tutelary with such; for instance, a community within the civitas of the Remi in Gaul adopted Apollo as its tutelary, and at the capital of the Remi (present-day Rheims), the tutelary was Mars Camulus.” ref 

Household deity (a kind of or related to a Tutelary deity)

“A household deity is a deity or spirit that protects the home, looking after the entire household or certain key members. It has been a common belief in paganism as well as in folklore across many parts of the world. Household deities fit into two types; firstly, a specific deity – typically a goddess – often referred to as a hearth goddess or domestic goddess who is associated with the home and hearth, such as the ancient Greek Hestia.” ref

“The second type of household deities are those that are not one singular deity, but a type, or species of animistic deity, who usually have lesser powers than major deities. This type was common in the religions of antiquity, such as the Lares of ancient Roman religion, the Gashin of Korean shamanism, and Cofgodas of Anglo-Saxon paganism. These survived Christianisation as fairy-like creatures existing in folklore, such as the Anglo-Scottish Brownie and Slavic Domovoy.” ref

“Household deities were usually worshipped not in temples but in the home, where they would be represented by small idols (such as the teraphim of the Bible, often translated as “household gods” in Genesis 31:19 for example), amulets, paintings, or reliefs. They could also be found on domestic objects, such as cosmetic articles in the case of Tawaret. The more prosperous houses might have a small shrine to the household god(s); the lararium served this purpose in the case of the Romans. The gods would be treated as members of the family and invited to join in meals, or be given offerings of food and drink.” ref

“In many religions, both ancient and modern, a god would preside over the home. Certain species, or types, of household deities, existed. An example of this was the Roman Lares. Many European cultures retained house spirits into the modern period. Some examples of these include:

“Although the cosmic status of household deities was not as lofty as that of the Twelve Olympians or the Aesir, they were also jealous of their dignity and also had to be appeased with shrines and offerings, however humble. Because of their immediacy they had arguably more influence on the day-to-day affairs of men than the remote gods did. Vestiges of their worship persisted long after Christianity and other major religions extirpated nearly every trace of the major pagan pantheons. Elements of the practice can be seen even today, with Christian accretions, where statues to various saints (such as St. Francis) protect gardens and grottos. Even the gargoyles found on older churches, could be viewed as guardians partitioning a sacred space.” ref

“For centuries, Christianity fought a mop-up war against these lingering minor pagan deities, but they proved tenacious. For example, Martin Luther‘s Tischreden have numerous – quite serious – references to dealing with kobolds. Eventually, rationalism and the Industrial Revolution threatened to erase most of these minor deities, until the advent of romantic nationalism rehabilitated them and embellished them into objects of literary curiosity in the 19th century. Since the 20th century this literature has been mined for characters for role-playing games, video games, and other fantasy personae, not infrequently invested with invented traits and hierarchies somewhat different from their mythological and folkloric roots.” ref

“In contradistinction to both Herbert Spencer and Edward Burnett Tylor, who defended theories of animistic origins of ancestor worship, Émile Durkheim saw its origin in totemism. In reality, this distinction is somewhat academic, since totemism may be regarded as a particularized manifestation of animism, and something of a synthesis of the two positions was attempted by Sigmund Freud. In Freud’s Totem and Taboo, both totem and taboo are outward expressions or manifestations of the same psychological tendency, a concept which is complementary to, or which rather reconciles, the apparent conflict. Freud preferred to emphasize the psychoanalytic implications of the reification of metaphysical forces, but with particular emphasis on its familial nature. This emphasis underscores, rather than weakens, the ancestral component.” ref

William Edward Hearn, a noted classicist, and jurist, traced the origin of domestic deities from the earliest stages as an expression of animism, a belief system thought to have existed also in the neolithic, and the forerunner of Indo-European religion. In his analysis of the Indo-European household, in Chapter II “The House Spirit”, Section 1, he states:

The belief which guided the conduct of our forefathers was … the spirit rule of dead ancestors.” ref

“In Section 2 he proceeds to elaborate:

It is thus certain that the worship of deceased ancestors is a vera causa, and not a mere hypothesis. …

In the other European nations, the Slavs, the Teutons, and the Kelts, the House Spirit appears with no less distinctness. … [T]he existence of that worship does not admit of doubt. … The House Spirits had a multitude of other names which it is needless here to enumerate, but all of which are more or less expressive of their friendly relations with man. … In [England] … [h]e is the Brownie. … In Scotland this same Brownie is well known. He is usually described as attached to particular families, with whom he has been known to reside for centuries, threshing the corn, cleaning the house, and performing similar household tasks. His favorite gratification was milk and honey.” ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref

Hinduism around 3,700 to 3,500 years old. ref

 Judaism around 3,450 or 3,250 years old. (The first writing in the bible was “Paleo-Hebrew” dated to around 3,000 years ago Khirbet Qeiyafa is the site of an ancient fortress city overlooking the Elah Valley. And many believe the religious Jewish texts were completed around 2,500) ref, ref

Judaism is around 3,450 or 3,250 years old. (“Paleo-Hebrew” 3,000 years ago and Torah 2,500 years ago)

“Judaism is an Abrahamic, its roots as an organized religion in the Middle East during the Bronze Age. Some scholars argue that modern Judaism evolved from Yahwism, the religion of ancient Israel and Judah, by the late 6th century BCE, and is thus considered to be one of the oldest monotheistic religions.” ref

“Yahwism is the name given by modern scholars to the religion of ancient Israel, essentially polytheistic, with a plethora of gods and goddesses. Heading the pantheon was Yahweh, the national god of the Israelite kingdoms of Israel and Judah, with his consort, the goddess Asherah; below them were second-tier gods and goddesses such as Baal, Shamash, Yarikh, Mot, and Astarte, all of whom had their own priests and prophets and numbered royalty among their devotees, and a third and fourth tier of minor divine beings, including the mal’ak, the messengers of the higher gods, who in later times became the angels of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Yahweh, however, was not the ‘original’ god of Israel “Isra-El”; it is El, the head of the Canaanite pantheon, whose name forms the basis of the name “Israel”, and none of the Old Testament patriarchs, the tribes of Israel, the Judges, or the earliest monarchs, have a Yahwistic theophoric name (i.e., one incorporating the name of Yahweh).” ref

“El is a Northwest Semitic word meaning “god” or “deity“, or referring (as a proper name) to any one of multiple major ancient Near Eastern deities. A rarer form, ‘ila, represents the predicate form in Old Akkadian and in Amorite. The word is derived from the Proto-Semitic *ʔil-, meaning “god”. Specific deities known as ‘El or ‘Il include the supreme god of the ancient Canaanite religion and the supreme god of East Semitic speakers in Mesopotamia’s Early Dynastic Period. ʼĒl is listed at the head of many pantheons. In some Canaanite and Ugaritic sources, ʼĒl played a role as father of the gods, of creation, or both. For example, in the Ugaritic texts, ʾil mlk is understood to mean “ʼĒl the King” but ʾil hd as “the god Hadad“. The Semitic root ʾlh (Arabic ʾilāh, Aramaic ʾAlāh, ʾElāh, Hebrew ʾelōah) may be ʾl with a parasitic h, and ʾl may be an abbreviated form of ʾlh. In Ugaritic the plural form meaning “gods” is ʾilhm, equivalent to Hebrew ʾelōhîm “powers”. In the Hebrew texts this word is interpreted as being semantically singular for “god” by biblical commentators. However the documentary hypothesis for the Old Testament (corresponds to the Jewish Torah) developed originally in the 1870s, identifies these that different authors – the Jahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomist, and the Priestly source – were responsible for editing stories from a polytheistic religion into those of a monotheistic religion. Inconsistencies that arise between monotheism and polytheism in the texts are reflective of this hypothesis.” ref

 

Jainism around 2,599 – 2,527 years old. ref

Confucianism around 2,600 – 2,551 years old. ref

Buddhism around 2,563/2,480 – 2,483/2,400 years old. ref

Christianity around 2,o00 years old. ref

Shinto around 1,305 years old. ref

Islam around 1407–1385 years old. ref

Sikhism around 548–478 years old. ref

Bahá’í around 200–125 years old. ref

Knowledge to Ponder: 

Stars/Astrology:

  • Possibly, around 30,000 years ago (in simpler form) to 6,000 years ago, Stars/Astrology are connected to Ancestors, Spirit Animals, and Deities.
  • The star also seems to be a possible proto-star for Star of Ishtar, Star of Inanna, or Star of Venus.
  • Around 7,000 to 6,000 years ago, Star Constellations/Astrology have connections to the “Kurgan phenomenon” of below-ground “mound” stone/wood burial structures and “Dolmen phenomenon” of above-ground stone burial structures.
  • Around 6,500–5,800 years ago, The Northern Levant migrations into Jordon and Israel in the Southern Levant brought new cultural and religious transfer from Turkey and Iran.
  • “The Ghassulian Star,” a mysterious 6,000-year-old mural from Jordan may have connections to the European paganstic kurgan/dolmens phenomenon.

“Astrology is a range of divinatory practices, recognized as pseudoscientific since the 18th century, that claim to discern information about human affairs and terrestrial events by studying the apparent positions of celestial objects. Different cultures have employed forms of astrology since at least the 2nd millennium BCE, these practices having originated in calendrical systems used to predict seasonal shifts and to interpret celestial cycles as signs of divine communications. Most, if not all, cultures have attached importance to what they observed in the sky, and some—such as the HindusChinese, and the Maya—developed elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from celestial observations. Western astrology, one of the oldest astrological systems still in use, can trace its roots to 19th–17th century BCE Mesopotamia, from where it spread to Ancient GreeceRome, the Islamicate world and eventually Central and Western Europe. Contemporary Western astrology is often associated with systems of horoscopes that purport to explain aspects of a person’s personality and predict significant events in their lives based on the positions of celestial objects; the majority of professional astrologers rely on such systems.” ref 

Around 5,500 years ago, Science evolves, The first evidence of science was 5,500 years ago and was demonstrated by a body of empirical, theoretical, and practical knowledge about the natural world. ref

Around 5,000 years ago, Origin of Logics is a Naturalistic Observation (principles of valid reasoning, inference, & demonstration) ref

Around 4,150 to 4,000 years ago: The earliest surviving versions of the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh, which was originally titled “He who Saw the Deep” (Sha naqba īmuru) or “Surpassing All Other Kings” (Shūtur eli sharrī) were written. ref

Hinduism:

  • 3,700 years ago or so, the oldest of the Hindu Vedas (scriptures), the Rig Veda was composed.
  • 3,500 years ago or so, the Vedic Age began in India after the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization.

Judaism:

  • around 3,000 years ago, the first writing in the bible was “Paleo-Hebrew”
  • around 2,500 years ago, many believe the religious Jewish texts were completed

Myths: The bible inspired religion is not just one religion or one myth but a grouping of several religions and myths

  • Around 3,450 or 3,250 years ago, according to legend, is the traditionally accepted period in which the Israelite lawgiver, Moses, provided the Ten Commandments.
  • Around 2,500 to 2,400 years ago, a collection of ancient religious writings by the Israelites based primarily upon the Hebrew Bible, Tanakh, or Old Testament is the first part of Christianity’s bible.
  • Around 2,400 years ago, the most accepted hypothesis is that the canon was formed in stages, first the Pentateuch (Torah).
  • Around 2,140 to 2,116 years ago, the Prophets was written during the Hasmonean dynasty, and finally the remaining books.
  • Christians traditionally divide the Old Testament into four sections:
  • The first five books or Pentateuch (Torah).
  • The proposed history books telling the history of the Israelites from their conquest of Canaan to their defeat and exile in Babylon.
  • The poetic and proposed “Wisdom books” dealing, in various forms, with questions of good and evil in the world.
  • The books of the biblical prophets, warning of the consequences of turning away from God:
  • Henotheism:
  • Exodus 20:23 “You shall not make other gods besides Me (not saying there are no other gods just not to worship them); gods of silver or gods of gold, you shall not make for yourselves.”
  • Polytheism:
  • Judges 10:6 “Then the sons of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, served the Baals and the Ashtaroth, the gods of Aram, the gods of Sidon, the gods of Moab, the gods of the sons of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines; thus they forsook the LORD and did not serve Him.”
  • 1 Corinthians 8:5 “For even if there are so-called gods whether in heaven or on earth, as indeed there are many gods and many lords.”
  • Monotheism:
  • Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me.

Around 2,570 to 2,270 Years Ago, there is a confirmation of atheistic doubting as well as atheistic thinking, mainly by Greek philosophers. However, doubting gods is likely as old as the invention of gods and should destroy the thinking that belief in god(s) is the “default belief”. The Greek word is apistos (a “not” and pistos “faithful,”), thus not faithful or faithless because one is unpersuaded and unconvinced by a god(s) claim. Short Definition: unbelieving, unbeliever, or unbelief.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

Expressions of Atheistic Thinking:

  • Around 2,600 years ago, Ajita Kesakambali, ancient Indian philosopher, who is the first known proponent of Indian materialism. ref
  • Around 2,535 to 2,475 years ago, Heraclitus, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher, a native of the Greek city Ephesus, Ionia, on the coast of Anatolia, also known as Asia Minor or modern Turkey. ref
  • Around 2,500 to 2,400 years ago, according to The Story of Civilization book series certain African pygmy tribes have no identifiable gods, spirits, or religious beliefs or rituals, and even what burials accrue are without ceremony. ref
  • Around 2,490 to 2,430 years ago, Empedocles, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher and a citizen of Agrigentum, a Greek city in Sicily. ref
  • Around 2,460 to 2,370 years ago, Democritus, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher considered to be the “father of modern science” possibly had some disbelief amounting to atheism. ref
  • Around 2,399 years ago or so, Socrates, a famous Greek philosopher was tried for sinfulness by teaching doubt of state gods. ref
  • Around 2,341 to 2,270 years ago, Epicurus, a Greek philosopher known for composing atheistic critics and famously stated, “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ref

This last expression by Epicurus, seems to be an expression of Axiological Atheism. To understand and utilize value or actually possess “Value Conscious/Consciousness” to both give a strong moral “axiological” argument (the problem of evil) as well as use it to fortify humanism and positive ethical persuasion of human helping and care responsibilities. Because value-blindness gives rise to sociopathic/psychopathic evil.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

While hallucinogens are associated with shamanism, it is alcohol that is associated with paganism.

The Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries Shows in the prehistory series:

Show one: Prehistory: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” the division of labor, power, rights, and recourses.

Show two: Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show tree: Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show four: Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show five: Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show six: Emergence of hierarchy, sexism, slavery, and the new male god dominance: Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves!

Show seven: Paganism 5,000 years old: progressed organized religion and the state: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Kings and the Rise of the State)

Show eight: Paganism 4,000 years old: Moralistic gods after the rise of Statism and often support Statism/Kings: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (First Moralistic gods, then the Origin time of Monotheism)

Prehistory: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” the division of labor, power, rights, and recourses: VIDEO

Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Pre-Capitalism): VIDEO

Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves: VIEDO

Paganism 5,000 years old: progressed organized religion and the state: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Kings and the Rise of the State): VIEDO

Paganism 4,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (First Moralistic gods, then the Origin time of Monotheism): VIEDO

I do not hate simply because I challenge and expose myths or lies any more than others being thought of as loving simply because of the protection and hiding from challenge their favored myths or lies.

The truth is best championed in the sunlight of challenge.

An archaeologist once said to me “Damien religion and culture are very different”

My response, So are you saying that was always that way, such as would you say Native Americans’ cultures are separate from their religions? And do you think it always was the way you believe?

I had said that religion was a cultural product. That is still how I see it and there are other archaeologists that think close to me as well. Gods too are the myths of cultures that did not understand science or the world around them, seeing magic/supernatural everywhere.

I personally think there is a goddess and not enough evidence to support a male god at Çatalhöyük but if there was both a male and female god and goddess then I know the kind of gods they were like Proto-Indo-European mythology.

This series idea was addressed in, Anarchist Teaching as Free Public Education or Free Education in the Public: VIDEO

Our 12 video series: Organized Oppression: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of power (9,000-4,000 years ago), is adapted from: The Complete and Concise History of the Sumerians and Early Bronze Age Mesopotamia (7000-2000 BC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szFjxmY7jQA by “History with Cy

Show #1: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Samarra, Halaf, Ubaid)

Show #2: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Eridu “Tell Abu Shahrain”)

Show #3: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Uruk and the First Cities)

Show #4: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (First Kings)

Show #5: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Early Dynastic Period)

Show #6: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (King/Ruler Lugalzagesi)

Show #7: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Sargon and Akkadian Rule)

Show #8: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Naram-Sin, Post-Akkadian Rule, and the Gutians)

Show #9: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Gudea of Lagash and Utu-hegal)

Show #10: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Third Dynasty of Ur / Neo-Sumerian Empire)

Show #11: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Amorites, Elamites, and the End of an Era)

Show #12: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Aftermath and Legacy of Sumer)

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

The “Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries”

Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ Atheist Leftist @Skepticallefty & I (Damien Marie AtHope) @AthopeMarie (my YouTube & related blog) are working jointly in atheist, antitheist, antireligionist, antifascist, anarchist, socialist, and humanist endeavors in our videos together, generally, every other Saturday.

Why Does Power Bring Responsibility?

Think, how often is it the powerless that start wars, oppress others, or commit genocide? So, I guess the question is to us all, to ask, how can power not carry responsibility in a humanity concept? I know I see the deep ethical responsibility that if there is power their must be a humanistic responsibility of ethical and empathic stewardship of that power. Will I be brave enough to be kind? Will I possess enough courage to be compassionate? Will my valor reach its height of empathy? I as everyone, earns our justified respect by our actions, that are good, ethical, just, protecting, and kind. Do I have enough self-respect to put my love for humanity’s flushing, over being brought down by some of its bad actors? May we all be the ones doing good actions in the world, to help human flourishing.

I create the world I want to live in, striving for flourishing. Which is not a place but a positive potential involvement and promotion; a life of humanist goal precision. To master oneself, also means mastering positive prosocial behaviors needed for human flourishing. I may have lost a god myth as an atheist, but I am happy to tell you, my friend, it is exactly because of that, leaving the mental terrorizer, god belief, that I truly regained my connected ethical as well as kind humanity.

Cory and I will talk about prehistory and theism, addressing the relevance to atheism, anarchism, and socialism.

At the same time as the rise of the male god, 7,000 years ago, there was also the very time there was the rise of violence, war, and clans to kingdoms, then empires, then states. It is all connected back to 7,000 years ago, and it moved across the world.

Cory Johnston: https://damienmarieathope.com/2021/04/cory-johnston-mind-of-a-skeptical-leftist/?v=32aec8db952d  

The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist (YouTube)

Cory Johnston: Mind of a Skeptical Leftist @Skepticallefty

The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist By Cory Johnston: “Promoting critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics by covering current events and talking to a variety of people. Cory Johnston has been thoughtfully talking to people and attempting to promote critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics.” http://anchor.fm/skepticalleft

Cory needs our support. We rise by helping each other.

Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ @Skepticallefty Evidence-based atheist leftist (he/him) Producer, host, and co-host of 4 podcasts @skeptarchy @skpoliticspod and @AthopeMarie

Damien Marie AtHope (“At Hope”) Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist. Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Poet, Philosopher, Advocate, Activist, Psychology, and Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Historian.

Damien is interested in: Freedom, Liberty, Justice, Equality, Ethics, Humanism, Science, Atheism, Antiteism, Antireligionism, Ignosticism, Left-Libertarianism, Anarchism, Socialism, Mutualism, Axiology, Metaphysics, LGBTQI, Philosophy, Advocacy, Activism, Mental Health, Psychology, Archaeology, Social Work, Sexual Rights, Marriage Rights, Woman’s Rights, Gender Rights, Child Rights, Secular Rights, Race Equality, Ageism/Disability Equality, Etc. And a far-leftist, “Anarcho-Humanist.”

I am not a good fit in the atheist movement that is mostly pro-capitalist, I am anti-capitalist. Mostly pro-skeptic, I am a rationalist not valuing skepticism. Mostly pro-agnostic, I am anti-agnostic. Mostly limited to anti-Abrahamic religions, I am an anti-religionist.

My updated thoughts on the Evolution of Gods?
 
Animal protector tutelary deities at least 13,000/12,000 years ago, from old totems/spirit animal beliefs (tutelary animal spirits as protectors are at least 30,000 years old, as seen with dogs or dog-like animals) come first to me. Next, human sky/star/constellation deities focused representation on life-size or large nude male statues 11,000/10,000 years ago (Sky Father?), as well as small female figurines and female animal statues (Sky Mother?). Then, males (Hunter/Hurder) seem to lose some importance (Agriculture reliance may explain why), and the rise of Earth Mother (Gatherer becomes more important/powerful) female goddesses develop and are in control around 8,000 years ago. Women as the main power did not last long. Then male gods came roaring back about 7,000 to 5,000 years ago with clan wars. The “male god” seems to have forcefully become prominent/dominant around 7,000 years ago (Supreme Gods?). The “King of the Gods” idea likely is from the time of priest-kings 6,000 years ago. Whereas the now favored monotheism “male god” is more like after 4,000 years ago or so. Moralistic gods seem to relate to around 5,000/4,000 years ago, and monotheistic gods are last at around 4,000/3,000 years ago. Many monotheism-themed religions started in henotheism, emerging out of polytheism/paganism.
 
Gods?
“Animism” is needed to begin supernatural thinking.
“Totemism” is needed for supernatural thinking connecting human actions & related to clan/tribe.
“Shamanism” is needed for supernatural thinking to be controllable/changeable by special persons.
Together = Gods/paganism
 
Gods, like religions in general, are cultural products. To me, high gods, like “Sky Father” (Sun or Blue Sky usually, or Storm deities on the deity’s “dark side” like Yin and Yang) or “Sky Mother” (Moon or Stars) myths beliefs are at 39% when tested, in hunter-gatherers the world over.
The Evolution of Deities was not a one-and-done?
 
To me, the God of Sky, relating to stars 12,000 to 11,000 years ago, is older than the sun god of the sky 10,000 to maybe 11,000 years ago, but 10,000 seems more evident. Likewise, to me, the Mother Goddess of the sky was first 10,000 to maybe 11,000 years ago. All in the Middle East. Then, around 9,000 to 8,000, seemingly more evident 8,000 years ago, is the Earth Goddesses, also from the Middle East, likely once the Dawn goddesses or another goddess of the sky, possibly the night. Who dies in the childbirth of the Twins and by going to the underworld, is associated with the earth? Or is believed to live in the Earth at night, making her an Earth Goddess. These ideas were spread in several different ways, which impacted the entire world both directly and indirectly. It involved several different languages and DNA moving in different directions at various times. It is complicated and moving in different ways, even back and forth with different ideas moving both back and forth, especially in and out of the Middle East and Siberia.

Around 10,000 years ago, ideas went into Africa. Around 10,000 to 9,000 years ago, these ideas from the Middle East were in Siberia then moved to China and to the Americas by around 9,000 years ago. Religious ideas also left the Middle East from 9,000 to 8,000 years ago to Europe. Around 8,000 years ago, new ideas got to Ukraine but didn’t spread far. From 8,000 to 7,000 years ago, ideas again entered Africa with evolved beliefs from the Middle East. By 7,000 years ago, evolved deities from the Middle East moved again to Europe and Ukraine. And 7,000 years ago, the Siberian sun god of the sky, with a warrior culture, armed forts, and pre-kurgans, moved from Siberia to Ukraine and then returned to the Middle East around 6,000 years ago, influencing the Sumerian religious ideas. 6,000 to 5,000 years ago, these new Siberian influenced ideas from the Middle East were also in Africa. Then new evolved ideas moved back out of from Ukraine to the East by 5,500 to 5,000 years ago to Siberia, then China, and the Americas. Ideas from Ukraine went into Europe as well. Then, 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, the new ideas, now somewhat evolved again, from Siberia headed back to Europe, and so did ideas from the Middle East. ETC. This is just a rough outline to grasp some of the details, as I feel I understand them. There is a bit more, but this gives a good idea of how complicated it was.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

Damien Marie AtHope (Said as “At” “Hope”)/(Autodidact Polymath but not good at math):

Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist, Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Jeweler, Poet, “autodidact” Philosopher, schooled in Psychology, and “autodidact” Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Pre-Historian (Knowledgeable in the range of: 1 million to 5,000/4,000 years ago). I am an anarchist socialist politically. Reasons for or Types of Atheism

My Website, My Blog, & Short-writing or QuotesMy YouTube, Twitter: @AthopeMarie, and My Email: damien.marie.athope@gmail.com

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This