A Challenger responded to,
“Sending women dick pics is for amateurs. real men get out there and disappoint women in real life.” (So, don’t send unsolicited sexual pleasures, ask.)
Challenger, vaginas are disappointing…
Damien Marie AtHope, Are you being helpful? Are you saying the ones in your life? Are you saying all the ones in your personal sexual relationships? Are you saying this, to me, someone else, or your belief about the entire world. I need more information please. Like, is that expression what makes men send the pics or just your personal preference or where who just wanting the attention of saying someone will say your sexist I would not say that as the comment was to disappointing to not just respond to it directly.
Challenger, i am getting people’s goats damien shhhh
Damien Marie AtHope, ok Challenger, Ha Ha and I got your this is fun and I am quite unstable as well as in a dark mood right not so mean sound interesting really I am not saying I am good at it so please teach me.
Challenger, honestly though, i am pointing out the double standard in the comments as to saying mens sexual organs are disappointing and that being laughable, but saying something about women’s sexual organs is usually deemed sexist especially if it is derogatory.
Challenger, but then again, we dont hear about the epidemic of vagina pics because it likely doesn’t exist.
Challenger, not to victim blame, but guys probably bring this on themselves.
Challenger, ive never sent a dick pick, and i honestly love vaginas… they are leaps and bounds more useful than dicks… but i digress.
Challenger, unsolicited dicks here is some mushrooms in a picture.
Challenger, these dicks do not disappoint.
Damien Marie AtHope, Challenger, honestly though, I am pointing out how when someone puts down a man feels the need as the male champion, do I owe you a thank you for being a defender of the unsolicited deck pick senders no I got that wrong you are the savers knight of honor doing selflessly the job of being mean for the without context, just like a person more wanting to be confused then to be understood. So, Pease mean man tell me how what you did was not just a global attack on all women, as that is what you mint or are you now telling me I should not believe you? Are you to be trust? Are your behaviors worthy, in how you put others even done you wronged? what do you call people that pick on others that have done them no wrong? I thing you wish to be better do you not? I can’t imaging as such a crusader of hat is right, I mean not by your behavior no don’t be like you, wasn’t that your point? , if you felt wrong speak up honorable ant try fighting for what is right not continue what is wrong. I assume you are a moral man are you not? Tell me what is moral behavior when you think someone “me” as I am the one you are responding to right?
Damien Marie AtHope, Challenger, if someone if interested great for them that is a separate issue of what women like dick pics or whatever.
Damien Marie AtHope, take just one moment and then tell me what you did was protect the sexual abuse person if someone makes fun at their expense like I bet you do with Catholic Church, right? But I would wonder now with the behavior error made that you may have issues of …See More
Challenger, I think you are reading way too far into this… this had nothing to do with sexual abuse, and everything to do with a simple double standard…
Challenger, this at least explains my missing goat.
Damien Marie AtHope, yes your clear double standard…
Damien Marie AtHope, So, you are right, are you up to proving that right? cool, think I not you is the one right will you like the i post and tag you and we both can be created and see who’s argument, your claim of my double standard or is it you with the double standard? I will accept the will of the crowd. You responded to “Sending women dick pics is for amateurs. real men get out there and disappoint women in real life.”
Challenger, (waiting to be called sexist)
Damien Marie AtHope, you express “vaginas are disappointing…” Challenger; You’re, (wanting to be called sexist) comment was an open antagonistic logical fallacy of playing the victim, all the time feeling others not you are the victimizer, even when you even knew it was not a good, not hopeful, not some challenge with class. If you want to be taken serious kneeing the problem is not a solution.
Damien Marie AtHope, Egalitarian then? If so, that is why I know you will now go with me and help me troll some man’s page that said something about women derogatory, it was something like vaginas are disappointing… and then would not defend that statement. No, he gave an excuse that he has to do that so he can expose hidden ones by being like the vary this in issue men disrespecting women as having equal rights that even need to be considered if you have a self-righteous low churidar display as your more needed idea, really? and you are still proud about that?
Challenger, twas a simple joke m8
Challenger, i was pointing out a simple double standard.. disparaging male gentials is comedy, disparaging female genitals is sexism…
Challenger, everything youve said since is simply contrived.
Damien Marie AtHope, there was a different dubbed started thinking it’s wrong to protect some sex abusers and not others and that you don’t see that is surprising really. And I asked and still not justified valid or reliable rational. And what was it your moral high ground over me, a joke to be sure if you think that we need to talk bad.
Challenger, can you reiterate?
Challenger, i dont think i am part of the conversation you are having about abusers.
Challenger, i didnt even mention abusers.
Damien Marie AtHope, how are you any different that a sex precast defender when others make fun of him?
Challenger, …. again, i dont know what you are tlaking about.. this is about dick pics and the idea of male genitals being okay to disparage while female genitals arent..
Challenger, i never mentioned abusers, you did.
Damien Marie AtHope, you were not writing it because of the sex abusers fix pics then what was it your beliefs in the wrongness of women’s virginal health, if so please explain. And forget about me even in your lifetime allowing you to call the distance of a comment only the communication of a limited thinker only bent on his dogma so deluded by the denialism of your actions in the true abusive nature you posted it in.
Challenger, ???? tf
Challenger, can you be coherent please?
Challenger, what sex abuser?
Challenger, id hardly call a UDP sex abuse.
Damien Marie AtHope, I deeply get you don’t get the vile abusive comments as abusers don’t usually get it either.
Challenger, are you seriously calling me a sexual abuser?
Damien Marie AtHope, You know the original post that you made your unconnected ludicrous shame enjoying comment.
Challenger, can you post it for me because i seem to be missing it.
Challenger, was it where i said guys who send UDP’s bring the criticism on themselves?
Challenger, was it where i said guys who send UDP’s bring the criticism on themselves?
Challenger, can you post it for me because i seem to be missing it
Challenger, i said vaginas are disappointing, (something i dont actually think) in order to point out why its shitty to label penises as inherently disappointing… i am not seeing how you arrived at anything else…
Damien Marie AtHope, you defended the sex abuser by posting your vile comment. Do you make such communications about women your with. If your comments are so easily supported and me so wrong, it would not bother you is all the women in your family get your comment about their Virginia?
Challenger, what sex abuser?
Challenger, you are full of shit damien.
Challenger, loads of jargon and regressive sentiments embodied in someone who claims to be so progressive…
Damien Marie AtHope, I mean someone who uses sexuality as a form of abuse behaviors.
Challenger, i defended no one, you are making this out of thin air, i was simply saying its okay to disparage male genitls, not okay to disparage female genitals.. thats the standard.
Challenger, i dont agree with the standard.
Challenger, i dont think its okay to disparage genitals.
Damien Marie AtHope, there are all kinds of abuse, you do know that right? There are psychological abuse.
Challenger, i dont see how you got anything else out of this.
Challenger, ….. no one is being abused in this thread damien.
Challenger, do you just baffle people with bullshit or is there actually any substance?
Challenger, im done here….
Damien Marie AtHope, If you have no problem with the content should I post it in your name and right , he really showed me. Wow I see I should never make fun of sexual flashers a crime in case anyone forgot when think about the issues your feel was showing a dubbed standard when it’s what you did that holds the dubbed standard.
Damien Marie AtHope, you never started you. You leave without defending your bad choice, you stated,
“Challenger, vaginas are disappointing…” I responded,
Damien Marie AtHope, are you being helpful? Are you saying the ones in your life? Are you saying all the ones in your personal sexual relationships? Are you saying this, to me, someone else, or your belief about the entire world. I need more information please. Like, is that expression what makes men send the pics or just your personal preference or where who just wanting the attention of saying someone will say your sexist I would not say that as the comment was to disappointing to not just respond to it directly, you stated,
“Challenger, i am getting peoples goats damien shhhh” (not any defense at all just a trolling) You never started you.
Challenger, i posted a picture of some penis envy magic mushrooms.
Challenger, ive never sent a dick pic before.
Damien Marie AtHope, I only send it to women, but I ask first.
Damien Marie AtHope, some say no some say yes.
Challenger, and ive never done anything like that so??? whats the point of this again?
Challenger, all i see is that you clearly cant comprehend the nature of a joke, or the fact that there is a double standard concerning comedy surrounding genitals…
Challenger, typical regressive leftist incoherence…
Damien Marie AtHope, And again you are defending the abuse? How are you different?
Challenger, what fucking abuse???
Challenger, i am talking about comedy surrounding genitals.. tf are you on?
Challenger, i am not defending people who send UDP’s.
Damien Marie AtHope, I am not a Democrat I am an anarchist socialist mutualist, I am a revolutionary not some timid Leftist as I know you already know.
Challenger, your labels dont mean much to me.
Challenger, your rhetoric is indistinguishable from a regressive leftist.
Damien Marie AtHope, I said I was in a very mad mood fell like roping shit up.
Challenger, so you trolled me?
Damien Marie AtHope, You are so confused. I held you accountable for your shit mean comment. And how are you different? I trolled you? Did you forget my first response you never angered, “Are you being helpful? Are you saying the ones in your life? Are you saying all the ones in your personal sexual relationships? Are you saying this, to me, someone else, or your belief about the entire world. I need more information please.”
Damien Marie AtHope, So trolling a troll then is good bad of just the fun it’s been. And how are you different?
Damien Marie AtHope, Sexting is the sharing of nude or sexually explicit messages or photos, usually by cell phone or some other electronic device or means. Between consenting adults, the private sharing of nude or suggestive photos is generally not illegal. However, that does not mean that adults can freely engage in sexting. There are circumstances under which sexting by adults could result in criminal charges. http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/is-sexting-illegal-adults.htm
Damien Marie AtHope, What is your evidence for your double standard of defaming the victim. 61 % of women have received an unsolicited dick pic. Zero per cent appreciate them. 47 per cent of those had received them more than once. but you with no proof at all think I am wrong well we just got wormed up. I have offered my proof. where is yours as you think you have this issue better than me, so you think. I am waiting for your convincing argument?
Damien Marie AtHope, Sexting Offenses
Some criminal charges that can result from sexting include felony and misdemeanor offenses, such as:
*Distributing or Possessing a Sexually Explicit Photo
*Internet Sex Crimes
But these laws also often apply unfairly when only teens are involved, or even if a 17 or 18 year-old boy sends racy texts to his 16 year old girlfriend. Or if a girl sends a suggestive or nude image to her boyfriend, the boyfriend could be charged with possession of child pornography just for receiving the image. Federal Sex Offender Registration: If you are convicted of any sex offense or criminal charge designated as sexual in nature, you will be required to register as a sex offender, and be part of a national database. Legal Defenses In Sexting Cases: Legal strategies in sexting cases, and any with any charges of a sexual nature often start with trying to get sexual offender status off the table as a possible penalty. If there is an opportunity to argue for reducing the charges to a lesser offense, that is often a good outcome. Sexting laws reform efforts continue in many states, but most statutes still list extreme penalties for juveniles engaged in this behavior. Any sex offense is a very serious charge, and needs an aggressive and smart legal strategy. http://www.sexcrimecriminaldefense.com/sexting/
Why do men send unsolicited dick pics? “It is a growing problem but there isn’t much data about the prevalence of this phenomenon,” says Dr Nicola Henry, a senior lecturer in crime, justice and legal studies at La Trobe University. “In some cases, people are doing it as a form of sexual harassment; they are deliberately trying to harass and intimidate another person. “I think it’s an issue that needs more attention.” Dr Henry stresses that while exchanging sexually explicit images is acceptable behaviour between consenting adults – a form of “modern day flirtation” – sending unsolicited images may constitute a form of sexual harassment. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-09/why-men-send-unsolicited-dick-pics/7540904
You are trying to use the Victim Fallacy posts inflammatory troll posts: one, a rhetorical tactic of batting with “vaginas are disappointing” using the language in my post making fun of sexual criminals and two the preemptive self-protection as well as the last part of the Victim Fallacy you though would work when you know I am quite right and you are all kinds of wrong then continued exposing of your tactics utter “point” failure to make you anything but uninformed and confused, never how you are any different?
You seem to like the Victim Fallacy, makes a unconnected rude comment then when is asked and has only a weak nothing defense you offer that my challenging you back is trolling you “Challenger, so you trolled me?”, here is a Description:
This fallacy occurs when a person uncritically assumes that the cause of a perceived mistreatment (such as not being hired or receiving a poor grade) is due to prejudice (such as sexism or racism) on the part of the person or persons involved in the perceived mistreatment. The form of “reasoning” is as follows:
- Person P believes s/he is being mistreated by person or persons M.
- Person P regards himself or herself as a member of group G and believes this group has been subject to prejudice. Or P believes that M regards him/her as a member of G.
- P uncritically concludes that his/her perceived mistreatment is the result of prejudice against G on the part of M.
This is a fallacy because a person perceives himself or herself as being mistreated, does not provide sufficient justification for the claim, that the alleged mistreatment is the result of prejudice. After all, even if the situation does involve mistreatment, it might be the result of factors that have nothing to do with prejudice of the sort being considered. https://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/victim-fallacy/
Women are more likely to be victims of sexual violence than are men. The National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) sampled 8,000 women and 8,000 men and found that 1 in 6 women (17 percent) and 1 in 33 men (3 percent) reported experiencing an attempted or completed rape at some time in their lives. Women are significantly more likely than men to be injured during an assault. In one NIJ-funded study, 31.5 percent of female rape victims, compared with 16.1 percent of male rape victims, reported being injured during their most recent rape. Sexual violence may begin early in life. Researchers also found that among female rape victims surveyed, more than half (54 percent) were younger than age 18; 32.4 percent were ages 12–17; and 21.6 percent were younger than age 12 at time of victimization. Early abuse and later victimization. Although child sexual abuse before age 13 is not by itself a risk factor for adult sexual victimization or domestic violence, girls who were victimized before turning 12 and then again as adolescents (ages 13–17) were at much greater risk of both types of victimization as adults than any other women. http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/rape-sexual-violence/pages/victims-perpetrators.aspx
How are you any different with your double standard equivocation and special pleading, both different logical fallacies, one of many you think are solid real arguments, so how is it that a sex priest defender is wrong or do you think even they too like you believe about your so rite a comment of said vaginas are disappointing, (something you say you don’t actually think, thus, an admitted lie to start all this off) when others make fun of a sex abuser priest?
How are you any different with your double standard equivocation and special pleading, Special Pleading Description: Applying standards, principles, and/or rules to other people or circumstances, while making oneself or certain circumstances exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification. Special pleading is often a result of strong emotional beliefs that interfere with reason. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/163/Special-Pleading