Near East pottery at Boncuklu Hoyuk (Turkey) (8,300–7,800 BCE) and Çatal Hoyuk (Turkey) (7.500-5.600 BCE), within the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B 8800–6500 BCE, as well as early pottery in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel.

Stone Vessels (Pre-Pottery Neolithic) before the Pottery Neolithic  

“A stone vessel is a hollow container made of stone. The scope of such vessels excludes pottery fired from clay (stoneware) and instead concentrates on those carved from a solid chunk of natural stone.” ref

“Starting from the Epipalaeolithic (c. 12,000–9600 BCE), but especially during the Early Neolithic of the Near East (Pre-Pottery Neolithic, PPN, 9,600–6,500 BCE), a wide range of stone vessels appear in site inventories. This period is linked to the Neolithization process, which included a fundamental change of human diet through the adoption of cereals as staple food. This emphasized the existence of diverse Neolithic foodways and regional traditions in food processing. Preserved food remains, methods for residues, use-wear combined with experimental programs, and the identification of cooking installations have revealed the omnipresence of bread-like products in different regions of the Early Neolithic Near East. In addition, there is evidence for the presence of porridge-like products at some Neolithic sites. So far, this potential diversity of early cereal processing (boiling, baking, brewing) has not been systematically linked to the diverse set of stone vessels known from this period. Rather, the appearance of dedicated cooking containers has been pinpointed to Late Neolithic pottery vessels that are directly heatable over a fire.” ref

“While there are several supra-regional studies on ground stone assemblages and stone vessels for the Southern Levant, few reports of sites with assemblages containing stone vessels have been published from Northern Mesopotamia where both coarse and carefully finished vessels are attested since the PPNA. Middle-sized, open limestone bowls, and different rim shapes as well as platters in diameter occur frequently. Similarly sized thin-walled and often richly decorated containers made of a soft ‘greenstone’ have also been reported from early Neolithic sites in that area. Another object group are the large PPNA and PPNB limestone troughs. Platters and symmetrical bowls have been discussed as dishware for the orchestrated presentation and consumption of foodstuffs within households when nuclear families and the private realm became more important during the transition to a fully sedentary agricultural lifestyle. For the Neolithic site of Çatalhöyük, it has been suggested that organic containers were used for boiling food.” ref

“Stone containers have only rarely been linked to the preparation of soaked or heated meals. Large containers in Neolithic houses have been proposed for the storage of water or foodstuffs including cereals. In the case of the limestone troughs, an interpretation as tools used for the preparation of beer due to the presence of charred cereals in their fills and associations with burnt stones at some sites has been put forward. The presence of oxalate on the walls of such containers at Göbekli Tepe has been discussed as tentative evidence for beer, though oxalate can also be produced when grains regularly come into contact with water, or in certain plants.” ref

“For the fermentation process, modified starch particles in Late Natufian mortars have been used as evidence for beer. Here, we applied an integrated approach to investigate the functions of stone vessels in Neolithic foodways through contextual, use-wear, scientific and experimental analyses of the stone vessel assemblage from Göbekli Tepe. With about 600 pieces it is the largest known repertoire of Early Neolithic stone vessels. They are accompanied by more than 10,000 grinding stones, which previous analyses has connected to the large-scale processing of cereals. Experimental work and surface analysis of use-wear show that processing of both fine and coarse cereal flour was performed at Göbekli Tepe, although patterns for coarse flour prevail.” ref

ref

(1): PPNA= Pre-Pottery Neolithic A, (2): MPPNB= Middle Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, (3): LPPNB= Late Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, (4): PPNC= Pre-Pottery Neolithic C, Early PN = Early Pottery Neolithic. ECA= Early Central Anatolia/Turkey (Pottery Neolithic).” ref

“The Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) represents the early Neolithic in the Near East, dating to c. 12,000 – c. 8,500 years ago, (10000 – 6500 BCE). The Pre-Pottery Neolithic is divided into Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA 10000–8800 BCE) and the following Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB 8800–6500 BCE). Pre-Pottery Neolithic C (circa 6500-6400 BCE) in Jordan and Israel. The site of ‘Ain Ghazal in Jordan has indicated a later Pre-Pottery Neolithic C period. In Israel, PPNC four sites had been clearly identified: Ashkelon (Afridar) and ‘Atlit Yam on the coast, stratum II at Tel ‘Ali one mile south of the Sea of Galilee, and Ha-Gosherim in the north.” ref

ref

Körtik Tepe with 500 stone vessels, many of them decorated with incised designs of plants, animals, humans, and various symbols, dated between 10,700-9,250 BCE. Chronologically, Kortik Tepe is followed by the Taş Tepeler culture sites of Karahan Tepe (9,750 BCE) and Göbekli Tepe (9,600–8,200 BCE), characterized by important monumental developments, and Jericho (site of Tell es-Sultan) (9,600–8,500 BCE) with its wall structure around an early city.” ref

“The same range of depictions of snakes, scorpions, quadrupeds, insects, and birds occurs on thin-walled stone cups and bowls of the Hallan Cemi (Turkey) (9,700-9,270 BCE) type. Fragments of this vessel type are known from Göbekli Tepe (Turkey), Çayönü (Turkey) (8,630-6,800 BCE), Nevali Cori (Turkey), Jerf el Ahmar (Syria) (9,500-8,700 BCE), Tell´Abr 3 (Syria) (9,280-8,930 BCE), and Tell Qaramel (Syria) (10,650-9,650 BCE), while complete vessels have been discovered at Körtik Tepe in large numbers as part of rich grave inventories.” ref

Göbekli Tepe with more than 600 stone vessels made up of small and middle-sized limestone vessels, big limestone troughs, limestone platters and fragments of ‘greenstone’ vessels.” ref  

Ayanlar Höyük with stone vessels decorated with animal motifs, dated between 8,800-7,000 BCE.” ref

Nevali Cori with a bas relief on a fragment of a limestone bowl depicts two humans and one tortoise-like creature dancing, dated between 8,400-8,100 BCE.” ref

“A precursor to clay pottery “White Ware” or “Vaisselle Blanche“, effectively a form of limestone plaster used to make vessels, was the first precursor to later clay pottery developed in the Levant that appeared in the 9th millennium BCE, during the pre-pottery (aceramic) neolithic period. It is not to be confused with “whiteware“, which is both a term in the modern ceramic industry for most finer types of pottery for tableware and similar uses, and a term for specific historical types of earthenware made with clays giving an off-white body when fired. White Ware was commonly found in PPNB archaeological sites in Syria such as Tell AswadTell Abu HureyraBouqras and El Kowm. Similar sherds were excavated at ‘Ain Ghazal in northern Jordan. White pozzolanic ware from Tell Ramad and Ras Shamra is considered to be a local imitation of these limestone vessels. It was also evident in the earliest neolithic periods of ByblosHashbaiLabwehTell Jisr and Tell Neba’a Faour in the Beqaa ValleyLebanon. It has been noted that this type of pottery was more prevalent and dated earlier in the Beqaa than at Byblos. A mixed form was found at Byblos where the clay was coated in a limestone slip, in both plain and shell combed finishes. The similarities of White Ware and overlapping time periods with later clay firing methods have suggested that Dark Faced Burnished Ware, the first real pottery, came as a development from this limestone prototype.” ref

“Dark faced burnished ware is the second oldest form of pottery developed in the western world, the oldest being Dotted wavy line pottery from Africa. It was produced after the earliest examples from the independent phenomenon of the Jōmon culture in Japan and is predominantly found at archaeological sites in LebanonIsrael southwest Syria and the earliest pottery in Cyprus. Some notable examples of dark faced burnished ware were found at Tell Judaidah (and nearby Tell Dhahab) in Amuq by Robert Braidwood as well as at Ras Shamra and Tell Boueid. Other finds have been made at Yumuktepe in Turkey were different categories of ware have been generally grouped as Dark faced burnished ware.” ref 

“It is thought to have come as a development of White Ware. Vessels are often coarse, tempered with grit or sand, and made with a variety of clays in different areas. Later examples are usually finer and more carefully burnished and decorated. Designs included rounded, inverted or straight sided bowls with plain rims, some with basic handles under the rims along with ring bases in the later pieces. Decorations included incised or impressed chevrons or motifs with pattern burnishing appearing in later periods. Other types of pottery were produced around the same time including coarse impressed ware, dark faced unburnished ware and washed impressed ware but these were less prevalent. Dark faced burnished ware has long been considered the forebear of the more polished examples such as ancient Greek pottery.” ref 

“Did pottery precede agriculture, or was it after? The dates are close, I always thought it was before, it was a technological advance that showed a new way of thinking. Stone remains stone, but to take clay and turn it into something new must have been magic.” – @JefferyParkins2 ref

My response: Pottery in China 20,000 years ago, began with hunter-gatherers and remained that way as it spread to Japan and Siberia, then to Europe. They likely made hot soup with meat and fish in them. Extensive wild-gathering and wild cereal management occurred in the Middle East before pottery. “The transition from high to low harvesting was a long process that took place during the origins of cereal agriculture, from 11,000 to 7,000 BCE. During the PPNA in the Near East, wild cereals started to be cultivated, though wild cereals in natural stands were occasionally harvested. High cutting was still dominant during this period, though sometimes cultivated cereals were reaped by cutting near the ground. During the PPNB, when the transition from wild to domestic cereals occurred, harvesting was carried out dominantly near the ground, indicating a growing need to use straw. Finally, during the Pottery Neolithic, low cutting was the standard method to harvest cereals. The reaped crops were probably grouped in sheaves and transported to the threshing area, a technical procedure that has persisted up to very recently in the Mediterranean area.” ref

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Hadza pre-fired figurines (Origin Date Unknown)

Czech Republic fired pottery (30,000 years ago)

China Xianren Cave pottery (20,000 years ago)

Japan pottery and fired figurines (16,500 years ago)

Siberia pottery  (16,000 years ago)

Mali Ounjougou pottery (12,000 years ago)

“Pottery first appeared between 20,000 and 12,000 calibrated years before present in East Asia, as evidenced by dated sequences at Xianrendong Cave, China. Similar early pottery has been documented elsewhere in China, Russia, and Japan between 17,000 and 15,000 calibrated years before present. In Africa, the emergence of pottery is situated around the end of the 12th millennium calibrated years before present. While the current state of research does not definitively determine whether pottery was invented in a single or multiple regions in Africa, it is certain that pottery technology rapidly spread across a zone spanning approximately 2000 to 3000 km, extending through the central and southern Sahara, the northern Sahel, and along the Nile from the First Cataract down to the confluence of the White and Blue Nile.” ref

Pic ref, ref

Bridging the Boreal Forest: Siberian Archaeology and the Emergence of Pottery among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers of Northern Eurasia

Abstract “The world’s earliest pottery comes from Late Pleistocene hunter-gatherer sites in East Asia. This material is typically seen as disconnected from later pottery traditions in Europe, which are generally associated with sedentary farmers. However, new evidence suggests that Asian and European pottery traditions may be linked to a Hyperborean stream of hunter-gatherer pottery dispersals that spanned eastern and western Asia, and introduced pottery into the prehistoric societies of northern Europe.” ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, refrefrefrefref, refrefrefrefref

Pottery from around 10,000 years ago at Boncuklu Höyük, to Aşıklı Höyük, to Çatalhöyük, then to Europe by around 7,500 years ago.

Pottery moves from China to Siberia, then to the Middle East, and Europe

“Ganj Dareh is important in the study of Neolithic Iran ceramics in Luristan and Kurdistan. This is a period beginning in the late 8th millennium, and continuing to the middle of the 6th millennium BCE.” ref

Pottery before the Pre-Pottery Neolithic? Pre-Pottery Neolithic (10000 – 6500 BCE) and Pottery Neolithic (7000–5000 BCE)

ref

“As a general but not absolute rule The Late Neolithic/Pottery Neolithic began with the first experiments with pottery, around 7000 BCE, and lasted until the discovery of copper metallurgy and the start of the Chalcolithic around 4500 BCE. After the initial Pre-Pottery Neolithic phase from northwestern Mesopotamia to Jarmo (red dots, circa 7500 BCE), the Pottery Neolithic culture of Mesopotamia in the 7th–5th millennium BCE was centered around the Hassuna culture in the north, the Halaf culture in the northwest, the Samarra culture in central Mesopotamia and the Ubaid culture in the southeast, which later expanded to encompass the whole region.” ref

“The northern Mesopotamian sites of Tell Hassuna and Jarmo are some of the oldest sites in the Near-East where pottery has been found, appearing in the most recent levels of excavation, which dates it to the 7th millennium BCE. This pottery is handmade, of simple design and with thick sides, and treated with a vegetable solvent. There are clay figures, zoomorphic or anthropomorphic, including figures of pregnant women which are taken to be fertility goddesses, similar to the Mother Goddess of later Neolithic cultures in the same region. The Late Neolithic began around 6,400 BCE in the Fertile Crescent, succeeding the period of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic. By then distinctive cultures emerged, with pottery like the Halafian (Turkey, Syria, Northern Mesopotamia) and Ubaid (Southern Mesopotamia).” ref

ref

“The Neolithic of the Southern Levant is divided into Pre-Pottery and Pottery or Late Neolithic phases, initially based on the sequence established by Kathleen Kenyon at Jericho. In the eastern desert regions of the Southern Levant—the Badia—the whole period is referred to as the Late Neolithic (c. 7000–5000 BCE). It is marked by the appearance of the first pastoralist societies in the desert, who may have migrated there following the abandonment of the large PPNB settlements to the west. In the Mediterranean zone, the Pottery Neolithic is further subdivided into two subphases and several regional cultures. However, the extent to which these represent real cultural phenomena is debated: Pottery Neolithic A (PNA) or Late Neolithic 1 (LN1): Yarmukian culture or Lodian (Jericho IX) culture. Pottery Neolithic B (PNB) or Late Neolithic 2 (LN2): Wadi Rabah culture.” ref

“Although the Yarmukian culture occupied limited regions of northern Israel and northern Jordan, Yarmukian pottery has been found elsewhere in the region, including the Habashan Street excavations in Tel Aviv and as far north as Byblos, Lebanon. Besides the site at Sha’ar Hagolan, 20 other Yarmukian sites have been identified in IsraelPalestineJordan and Lebanon. Of 163 sites found up to that date, the vast majority had been discovered in the main area known for its Yarmukian settlements, in and around the northern type-site of Sha’ar Hagolan, with just two exceptions further to the south.[1] This new finding led to speculations that much of the Southern Levant might have been inhabited by a contiguous civilization during the time (c. 6400–6000 BCE), with differences in pottery types being more significant to today’s archaeologists than to people living back then. A prehistoric site near Beit Hilkia, with findings from the Yarmukian, Late Chalcolithic, and the Middle Bronze Age IIA–IIB. Somewhat surprising was the discovery of a typical Yarmukian-style fired clay figurine of a fertility goddess, the southernmost such finding.” ref

“The Lodian culture or Jericho IX culture is a Pottery Neolithic culture of the Southern Levant dating from the first half of the 5th millennium BCE, existing alongside the Yarmukian and Nizzanim cultures. The Lodian culture appears mainly in areas south of the territory of the Yarmukian culture. The Jericho IX culture is defined by its distinctive pottery and the relationship between the Lodian culture and the two other Southern Levantine Pottery Neolithic cultures, the Yarmoukian and the Wadi Raba culture, has been debated for many years. Levy argued that it was a short-lived but distinct tradition that emerged after the Yarmoukian and before the Wadi Raba. Lodian pottery slightly differs in shape to the Yarmukian pottery and in decoration. One of the noted differences is more complexity in paste preparation and another being in its variety of vessel forms. The typical Lodian pottery vessels are painted and burnished, with distinctive geometric motifs.” ref

“The Wadi Rabah culture is a Pottery Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic culture of the Southern Levant, dating to the middle of the 5th millennium BCE. This period was first identified at the ancient site of Jericho (Tell es-Sultan) “Pottery Neolithic B”, a name now regarded as synonymous with the modernly defined Early Chalcolithic. Large courtyard structures were erected in the Wadi Rabah culture  period, like the ones found at Sha’ar HaGolan of the preceding Yarmukian culture (c. 6400–6000 BCE) and Tel Tsaf of the following Early/Middle Chalcolithic period (c. 5300–4500 BCE).” ref

1, Boncuklu Hoyuk (Turkey) (8,300–7,800 BCE) ref, “Boncuklu Höyük is within the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) dating to 10,800 –  8,500 years ago, or 8800–6500 BCE; and its fired clay sherds are therefore regarded as among the earliest ceramic vessels known in southwest Asia, although the manufacturing technique was different to that used to make the contemporaneous PPNB ceramics found at Kfar HaHoresh in Israel.” ref, ref, Asikli Hoyuk (Turkey) (8,2007,400 BCE) “A animal figurine as well as and small cones made of clay, and beads from a variety of raw materials include clay.” ref, ref, ref, and Çatal Hoyuk (Turkey) (7.500-5.600 BCE) ref “Basketry was a common craft at Ҫatalhӧyük during the Neolithic, with basket containers being used alongside undecorated pottery for everything from storage to burying the dead. It has long been thought that pottery styles and shapes were influenced by earlier organic containers such as baskets. It is often argued that the shape and decorative patterns on pottery from the American southwest, for example, mimic the designs of earlier basketry. Within this context, the ongoing work of Ҫatalhöyük’s ceramic specialist Ingmar Franz suggests that these influences may also be present in the pottery found at the West Mound at Ҫatalhӧyük. The settlement of the West Mound saw a move away from organic containers and simple pottery in favour of decorated pots, part of a wider regional change known as the ‘Painted Pottery Revolution’. This trend continued at Ҫatalhӧyük throughout the Chalcolithic period. Many of these painted pots take on a similar form to the baskets found at the East Mound and their decorative patterns can be interpreted as mimicking the coils and weaves of basketry. As Ingmar speculates, this was perhaps due to “a desire for form and function to remain consistent”. The causes of this change are unclear, yet Ingmar believes that shifts within people’s daily lives meant that crafting elaborate baskets became too time-consuming.” ref “The Neolithic East Mound and the Early Chalcolithic West Mound at Çatalhöyük are closer in time than has been previously assumed. However, we do not yet see any layers with transitional pottery: The latest pottery of the East Mound, in the TP area, is still very Neolithic. On the West Mound we deal with fully developed Chalcolithic ceramics. The main difference lies in the amount of pottery, which seems related to the fact that in the Early Chalcolithic, pottery replaced basketry in many everyday uses, resulting in the repertoire of vessels used on the West Mound being much more broad. This is especially exemplified by painted ornaments resembling basket texture and by the affinities in vessels’ shapes. Although this change was abrupt and vital, we can observe some continuity between the Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic pottery. Apart from single cases of similar forms and ornaments, similarity can be observed in pottery production: use of the same raw materials and techniques. From a technological point of view, Early Chalcolithic pottery making was not a radical departure from the Neolithic; this represents a strong argument in favor of both mounds at Çatalhöyük having been inhabited by the same population.” ref

Carbon Dating Çatalhöyük Pottery 8,722-7,672 years ago

“It relates to the early Neolithic (ca. 6700–5650 BCE or 8,722-7,672 years ago) site of Çatalhöyük in Turkey, dates from four pottery sherds also matched the site’s known chronology. Evershed hopes the technique will allow researchers to learn more about the origins of animal domestication. It could also reveal when changes in prehistoric diets, such as the adoption of dairy products, took place. The researchers analyzed microscopic traces of plant residues trapped in pits and crevices on stone tools. In addition to wheat, oats, peas, and vegetables grown by the early farmers, the researchers found traces of wild tubers and wild millet seeds. This is the first time the presence of wild millet has been detected at the site. These foraged plants would have supplemented the diet, and indicated that the residents of Çatalhöyük possessed knowledge of the tubers’ seasonal cycles. The study also suggests that the tools were used for other domestic activities in addition to processing plants.” ref, ref

2. Mezraa-Teleilat from the aceramic (Pre-Pottery Neolithic B) to the ceramic Neolithic ref, and Akarçay Tepe Höyük from the aceramic (Pre-Pottery Neolithic B) to the ceramic Neolithic, and the Pre-Halaf Pottery Neolithic Period. ref, ref

3. Tell Halula (Syria) (7.750-6,780 BCE) “Pre-Halaf’ period covering a very long initial stage of pottery production, introduction of Halaf culture at the end of the 7th millennium.” ref

4. Tell Abu Hureyra (Syria) (11,000-5,000 BCE) “Basket weaving as far back as 6500 BCE.” ref, “Between 6500 and 6000 BCE as a major building material, figurine fragments, Cylindrical clay beads and textile weaving, is illustrated in clay by the appearance of plain clay spindle whorls. Rectangular clay plaques decorated on all sides with punctated and linear motifs, are interpreted as stamp seals. A round clay “stamp” with a prehension knob exactly in the shape of the early stamp seals of the Halaf period bears no design at all on its face and its use is un­knownand. The Appearance of Pottery (6000-5500 BCE) at Tell Abu Hureyra.” ref

5. Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria) (7500-5500 BCE) ref “Earliest pottery of Syria 6900-6800 BCE mineral-tempered, sometimes painted wares and early Halaf period between 5100-5000 BCE. The oldest painted pottery here. Remarkably, the earliest pottery was of a very high quality, and some of it was already painted. Later, the painted pottery was discontinued, and the quality declined. Pottery found at the site includes Dark Faced Burnished Ware(earliest examples from the Jōmonculture in Japan and predominantly found at archaeological sites in LebanonIsrael, southwest Syria and Cyprus. Some notable examples of dark faced burnished ware were found at Tell Judaidah (and nearby Tell Dhahab) in Amuq by Robert Braidwood as well as at Ras Shamra and Tell Boueid. Other finds have been made at Yumuktepe in MersinTurkey) and a Fine Ware that resembled Hassuna Ware and Samarra Ware.” ref

6. Tell Halaf (Syria) (6,100 to 5,400 BCE) “The Halaf culture 6,100-5100 BCE a continuous development out of the earlier Pottery Neolithic and is located primarily in the fertile valley of the Khabur River (tributary to the Euphrates in Syria that originates in Turkey). Halaf culture is found in Northern-Eastern Syria, South-Eastern Turkey, and northern Iraq, although Halaf-influenced material is found throughout Greater Mesopotamia. The Halaf period was succeeded by the Halaf-Ubaid Transitional period, which comprised the late Halaf (c. 5400–5000 BCE), and then by the Ubaid period (6500–3800 BCE).” ref, and Tell Kashkashok (Syria) (6500 – 5000 BCE) “The site is dated by pottery finds to the latter neolithic era, and early Dynastic era. Pre-Halfa – Proto-Hassuna culture dates to 6,300 BCE and Proto-Hassuna is seen at Tell Kashashok (Layer 3).” ref, ref, “Pre-Proto-Hassuna (7000-6700 BCE) refers to the Late Neolithic period in Upper Mesopotamia when the ceramic containers were just being introduced.  At this time stone vessels and White Ware were (appeared in the 9th millennium BCE, during the pre-pottery (aceramic) neolithic period) still being used in addition to pottery. The pottery vessels were still very few in number in these early settlements. At that time, the main emphasis was on the pottery with a mineral temper, as opposed to the plant-tempered pottery which came to predominate later.” ref,  “White Ware was commonly found in PPNB archaeological sites in Syria, northern Jordan, and Lebanon, with similarities as well as overlapping time periods with later clay-firing methods have suggested that Dark Faced Burnished Ware at sites in LebanonIsrael, Syria, and Cyprus; the first real pottery, developed from this limestone prototype.” ref, ref, ref

7. Tell Hassuna (Iraq) (early sixth millennium BCE) “Tell Hassuna is the type site for the Hassuna culture. Around 6,000 BCE, at Tell Hassuna, adobe dwellings were built around open central courts; fine painted pottery was replacing the crude pottery of the earlier levels. Female figurines were also used in relation to worship and jar burials, within which food was placed due to belief in the afterlife. Pottery found at Hassuna can be divided into three different categories: Hassuna Archaic, Hassuna Standard, and Samarran. These also include painted, incised, and painted-incised ware. At Hassuna, six different layers of houses were uncovered, revealing various vessels and pottery that date ca. 5600-5350 BCE, with each layer becoming more substantial. Similar vessels were found throughout the Middle East, showing that there was an extensive trade network that was present as early as the 6th Millennium BCE. Hassuna was one of the earliest cultures in Northern Mesopotamia. Before this time, Southern Mesopotamia was considered the cradle of civilization. When settlements began forming in the north, such as Hassuna, JarmoSamarra, and Tell Halaf, the north became an important region.” ref, and Tell Arpachiyah (Iraq) (6000-5000 BCE) “The site was occupied in the Halaf and Ubaid periods. It appears to have been heavily involved in the manufacture of pottery. The pottery recovered there forms the basis for the internal chronology of the Halaf period.” ref, and Tell Maghzaliyah (Iraq) (7000 BCE, part of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B 8,800–6,500 BCE) “Tell Maghzaliyah shows the development of pre-Hassuna culture. There are also numerous connections to the Jarmo culture going back to 7000 BCE. The clay used for construction was apparently imported from other locations, as the primary natural stratigraphy is limestone loam. A cold hammered ‘awl’ (or a chisel) made from native copper (i.e. not smelted) was found on the floor of one of the houses. Other early sites with metal are also Ali Kosh in lowland Iran, and Tol-e Nurabad and Tepe Sialk in the Iranian Zagros Mountains. Also in the Iranian Zagros, near Marvdasht, are located the sites of Tall-i Mushki, and Tall-i Jari showing evidence of early metallurgy utilizing native copper. All these settlements date to the late 7th/early 6th millennia BCE.” ref, and Yarim Tepe (Iraq) (6,000 BCE to 5th millennium BCE) “Yarim Tepe I belongs to the Hassuna culture with the earliest known kiln, dating to around 6,000 BCE. Some finds include ceramic vases, female clay figurines, and other objects. Metal objects were also found, such as a lead bracelet, copper beads, and copper ore, which represent some of the oldest examples of metallurgy in Mesopotamia. And Yarim Tepe II is a settlement of the Halafian culture, dating to the 5th millennium BCE. Ceramic vessels in the shape of elephants and women were among the finds. Some ceramic containers depict fish, birds, gazelles, and other animals. Several pendant seals were also discovered, including a very old copper seal. The site consists of several mounds that reflect the development of the Hassuna culture, to later the Halaf and Obed cultures (or Ubaid culture).” ref 

8. Umm Dabaghiyah (Iraq) (6,000–5,800 BCE) “The term Proto-Hassuna culture is also frequently used synonymously, as the Umm Dabaghiyah-Sotto culture is considered a direct precursor to the Hassuna culture. Proto-Hassuna culture a direct precursor to the Hassuna culture, pottery 5,800–5,260 BCE. Isolated older sites, such as Jarmo or Maghzaliya, already possessed knowledge of pottery production and are thus considered classic representatives of the ceramic Neolithic period before the heyday of the Umm Dabaghiyah-Sotto type, but their assemblages did not reach the same diversity. From around 6,000 BCE onwards, not only is there a more widespread use of ceramic goods in northern Mesopotamia, but greater similarities also emerge between the finds from the individual settlements, shaping the picture of a coordinated network. The ceramic vessels of this group are primarily simple in design, with thick, vegetable- tempered walls and were fired at low temperatures. Their coarse forms were created by hand using coil throwing , as the potter’s wheel had not yet been invented. Alongside this coarse-grained ware, however, ceramics made of finer material were also found, which may have been imported. Although the vast majority of the vessels found are undecorated, some examples painted with ochre exist , while others were polished or decorated with incised designs. Simple motifs such as dots, circles, hooks, triangles, or herringbone patterns, usually placed below the rims, are dominant. Bowls with grooved bottoms, presumably used for peeling legumes, are also found in Hassuna ware. Particularly noteworthy are the finely modeled, practically designed decorative elements, such as human eyes and ears, animal heads, snakes, anthropomorphic figures, or crescent moons. Examples include round or oval vessel shapes, simple pots, bowls and dishes, but also double-conical containers up to 50 cm/19.68 in high.” ref

9. Tell Shemshara (Iraq) (7322–7180 BCE – Early 6th millennium BCE “Hassuna period”- 4h millennium BCE “Uruk period”, to 3rd and 2nd millennium BCE, ETC.) “16 occupation layers, pre-Hassuna to the Hassuna period (early sixth millennium BCE) to the 14th century CE. However, the site was occupied, although not continuously, from the Hassuna period (early sixth millennium BCE) until the 14th century CE. The Hassuna period occupation pottery, has only been found in abundance in layers 13–9, shows stylistic links with that of Hassuna and Tell es-Sawwan. Whereas the main mound seems to have been abandoned after the Hassuna occupation, scarce archaeological material from the Uruk (fourth millennium BCE) and Jemdet Nasr periods (early third millennium BCE) has been found on the lower town.” ref

10. Jarmo (Iraq) (7,090-4,950 BCE) “Jarmo is one of the oldest sites at which pottery has been found, dates it to the 7,100-5,800 BCE. It was broadly contemporary with other important Neolithic sites such as Jericho in the Southern Levant and Çatalhöyük in Anatolia. The entire site consists of twelve levels. Jarmo appears to be two older, permanent Neolithic settlements and, approximately, contemporary with Jericho or the Neolithic stage of Shanidar. The high point is likely to have been between 6,200 and 5,800 BCE. In the earlier phases there is a preponderance of objects made from stone, silex—using older styles—and obsidian. The use of this latter material, obtained from the area of Lake Van, the largest lake in Turkey that is 200 miles away, and suggests that some form of organized trade already existed, as does the presence of ornamental shells from the Persian Gulf. In the oldest level baskets have been found, waterproofed with pitch, which is readily available in the area. Fragments of alabaster “soft rock” jars, Jarmo circa 7500 BCE, before the 7000 BCE. An early pottery bowl found dates to 7100-5800 BCE, from possibly the earliest Jarmo invention of pottery in the region. There is evidence that they had domesticated goats, sheep and dogs. On the higher levels of the site pigs have been found, together with the first evidence of pottery. Jarmo is one of the oldest sites at which pottery has been found, appearing in the most recent levels of excavation, which dates it to the 7th millennium BCE. This pottery is handmade, of simple design and with thick sides, and treated with a vegetable solvent. There are clay figures, zoomorphic or anthropomorphic, including figures of pregnant women which are taken to be fertility goddesses, similar to the Mother Goddess of later Neolithic cultures in the same region.” ref  

11. Ganj Dareh (Iran) ceramic tradition (7300-6900 BCE) “The oldest settlement remains on the site date back to c. 8,200 BCE, and have yielded the earliest evidence for goat domestication in the world. Ganj Dareh is important in the study of Neolithic ceramics beginning in the late 8th millennium BCE, and continuing to the middle of the 6th millennium BCE. Also, the evidence from two other excavated sites nearby is important, from Tepe Guran, and Tepe. At Ganj Dareh, two early ceramic traditions are evident. One is based on the use of clay for figurines and small geometric pieces like cones and disks. These are dated ca. 7,300-6,900 BCE. The other ceramic tradition originated in the use of clay for mud-walled buildings (7,300 BCE). These traditions are also shared by Tepe Guran, and Tepe Sarab. Tepe Asiab is also located near Tepe Sarab, and may be the earliest of all these sites. Both sites appear to have been seasonally occupied. A 40-year-old woman from Ganj Dareh, GD13a. mtDNA analysis shows that she belonged to Haplogroup X phenotypically similar to the Anatolian/Turkey early farmers and Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers. Her DNA revealed that she had black hair, brown eyes and SLC24A5 variant which is shown to be a major factor in the light skin tone of Europeans.” ref “The SLC24A5 gene, possibly originating as long as 19,000 years ago, it has been the subject of selection in the ancestors of Europeans as recently as within the last 5,000 years, and is fixed in modern European populations. The earliest known sample of the threonine allele is 13,000 years old from Satsurblia Cave in Georgia. The allele was widespread from Anatolia to Ukraine and Iran at the beginning of the Neolithic.” ref, “GD13a is genetically closest to the ancient Caucasus hunter-gatherers identified from human remains from Georgia (Satsurblia Cave and Kotias Klde). She belonged to a population (Neolithic Iranians) that was genetically distinct from the Neolithic Anatolian farmers. In terms of modern populations, she shows the relative highest genetic affinity with the Baloch peopleMakran Baloch, and Brahui people. Also genetically close to GD13a were ancient samples from Steppe populations (Yamanya 3,300–2,600 BCE Pontic–Caspian steppe, Mykhailivka 3,600–3,400 BCE from the lower Dnieper River in Ukraine, formed the core Yamnaya culture,  & Afanasievo 3300 to 2500 BCE south Siberia, from the pre-Yamnaya Repin culture) that were part of one or more Bronze age migrations into Europe, as well as early Bronze age cultures in that continent (Corded Ware) in line with previous relationships observed for the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers. And most Y-DNA Neolithic Iranian specimens from Ganj Dareh belong to the paternal haplogroup R2a that dates to 10,162 years old. Haplogroup R2 most often observed in Asia, especially on the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia. It is also reported at notable frequencies in the Caucasus. According to one model, the Mesolithic/Neolithic Iranian lineage are inferred to derive significant amounts of their ancestry from Basal Eurasian (c. 38–48%), with the remainder ancestry being closer to Ancient North Eurasians or Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer (ANE/EHG; c. 52–62%). A late Neolithic sample was found to belong to Haplogroup G2a.” ref, ref, And Clay vessels fragments at the site Ganj Dareh in the Central Zagros, no later than the end of the 9th millennium BCE.” ref

12. Tell es-Sawwan (Iraq) (5th millennium BCE, with the periods of Ubaid, Hassuna, and Samarra cultures) “An important Samarran period archaeological site in Saladin ProvinceIraq and Samarra culture pottery 5,500 to 4,800 BCE; partially overlaps with Hassuna and early Ubaid. It is considered the type site for the Samarran culture. The site is a primarily UbaidHassuna, and Samarra culture occupation with some later Babylonian graves. They used stone and flint tools similar to those of the Hassuna culture. They had fine Samarran ware and beautiful, translucent marble vessels. Underfloor graves of adults and children contained terracotta and alabaster statuettes of women and men, in various poses; some of these had the eyes and pointed heads typical of the Ubaid period.  There were five occupation layers. Among the finds were 77 Neolithic clay tokens and a number of clay sling bullets were also found, by a ditch and wall the excavators termed defensive in nature dated to 5,730 BCE.” ref

13. Rahmatabad Tepe (Iran) (7th to 5th millennium BCE) “A long cultural sequence has been found and the Pottery Neolithic starts in the late seventh millennium BCE. A large number of ancient shards and kilns, and an important industrial site dating back to the 5th millennium BCE. 12 square-shaped coupons (tokens), indicating that the people of the region had economic and commercial ties with neighboring regions in the 4th and 5th millenniums BCE. Also discovered 6000-year-old (4,000 BCE) clay coupons.” ref, and “The Neolithic phase can be further divided into two different  phases including pottery Neolithic (7029 to 7031 BCE) and Pre-pottery Neolithic (7032 to 7040 BCE).” ref

14. Touq Tappeh and Tappeh Valiki (Iran) (Pottery Neolithic starting 6,600–5,800 BCE) “The oldest Pottery Neolithic culture of northeastern Iran is at Touq Tappeh and Tappeh Valiki, making the Pottery Neolithic of eastern Mazandaran start at least from the first half of the 7th millennium BCE and lasted until the early 6th millennium BCE (c. 6,600–5,800 BCE). While Tappeh Valiki represents the oldest dates, the Pottery Neolithic periods may have started in the region even earlier, given the presence of potteries from the lowest layers of the site. The Pottery Neolithic layers of Tappeh Valiki started in 6c600 BCE and ended in 5,900 BCE, showing that the phase of the Pottery Neolithic of eastern Mazandaran, which contains Caspian Neolithic Soft-ware (The CNS), started at least from the mid-7th millennium BCE and continued until the beginning of the 6th millennium BCE. Also, according to dating from the Kamarband Cave, the PPN starts in 7,940 BCE and the Pottery Neolithic starts in 7,140 BCE.  Analysis of the available material from these sites through dating indicates strong regional connections, while also showing inter-regional connections. The new dating from the old and new Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic sites of eastern Mazandaran suggests there is no gap between them, which is not surprising given the favorable environment during the early Holocene.” ref 

15. Tol-e Sangi (Iran) (7th millennium BCE) “Pottery Neolithic in the late 7th millennium BCE has generally been proposed in Iran and for decades, it was believed that the first pottery culture in South Iran to be represented by Mushki ware, dating from the late 7th millennium BCE. However, excavations at Tape Rahmatabad produced evidence suggesting the emergence of Neolithic pottery at the beginning of the 7th millennium BCE, almost contemporary with the first pottery in the eastern wing of the Fertile Crescent. Evidence from the Tol-e Sangi site, where a neatly stratified sequence from Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) to early PN was discovered. Although the Pottery Neolithic in Fars highlands, southeast of the Fertile Crescent has long been believed to have started in the late 7th millennium BCE, recent excavations at Tepe Rahmatabad have suggested a date half a millennium earlier. Data from Tol-e Sangi, a stratified site with Pre-Pottery and Pottery Neolithic cultural deposits, support the advent of the Pottery Neolithic at the beginning of the 7th millennium BCE.” ref, and “During the excavation of Tol-e Sangi in southern Iran, tokens and a sealing were discovered in 7050–6900 BCE layers. As the oldest sealing found in Iran, this artefact suggests that storage and sealing practices were used during the PPN period in South-west Asia. Seals and sealings are indicators of some degree of social complexity. Surplus production and the concomitant need to store and monitor this surplus led to the practice of storing and sealing items in containers or warehouses. Clay sealing is where a piece of clay is used to secure an object, this could be a storeroom door or a container such as a pot, basket or sack. The oldest evidence of sealing in the western part of the Fertile Crescent dates to the late Pre-Pottery Neolithic (late 8th millennium), while the use of sealing appears to be more recent in the eastern part. Around 25 seals and 140 sealings retrieved in Tol-e Bakun in the Fars cultural zone of southern Iran indicates that the Chalcolithic society of the fifth millennium BCE in this region was increasingly complex. Small clay and stone objects, which may have been used for accounting and sealing, have also been found at the nearby site of Tol-e Sangi. These objects are substantially older than sealings previously found in Iran, dating to the end of the PPN.” ref

16. Byblos (Lebanon) (? – 6,400-5,500 BCE) “Cardium pottery or Cardial ware” and the alternative name, Impressed ware, because impressions can be made with sharp objects other than cockle shells, such as a nail or comb. And because impressed pottery is much more widespread than the Cardial. The Cardium pottery culture or Impressed ware culture, eventually extended from the Adriatic sea to the Atlantic coasts of Portugal and south to Morocco. According to Simões (2023) human remains from the earliest Neolithic contexts in northwestern Africa had European Neolithic ancestry (c. 5400 BCE), indicating that the first stages of the Neolithization process in northwestern Africa were started by the migration of Neolithic farmers from Iberia. The earliest pottery in the Tingitan peninsula (the African portion of the Gibraltar Strait) was also of Cardial type, with clear affinities to archaic Cardial pottery from CataloniaValencia.” ref, “During the Neolithic, from around 7,500 years ago onwards, there was a migration into Northwest Africa of European Neolithic Farmers from the Iberian Peninsula with G2 Y-DNA found in Morocco with Cardial pottery (who had originated in Anatolia/Turkey several thousand years prior; the geographic origin of haplogroup G plausibly locates somewhere nearby eastern AnatoliaArmenia or western Iran), as well as pastoralists from the Levant, with T Y-DNA found in Morocco with Proto-Beaker pottery (T may have expanded with the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B culture which originated in West Asia, and then spread into North Africa) via the Sinai Peninsula, both of whom also significantly contributed to the ancestry of modern Northwest Africans.” ref “The origin of the Impression culture is a subject of debate. The oldest examples of pottery with the imprint of Cardia shells were found in Byblos (Lebanon) and date back to the 9th millennium BCE. There is a chronological gap of 2.5 thousand years between these monuments and Cardia pottery in western Greece (pre- Sesklo in Thessaly). Ukrainian archaeologist D. L. Gaskevych believes that the chronological gap between the Byblos pottery and the later monuments of the Adriatic can be explained by the fact that the areas of Cardial migration in the 8th–7th millennium BCE were flooded by rising sea levels (see the theory of the Black Sea Flood ). He considers the Samchyn pottery of the 7th–6th millennium BCE, found in the northern Black Sea region and further inland from the coast, as one of the branches of Cardial pottery. The first known monuments of the Impresso culture itself were found on the eastern Adriatic coast and date back to the first centuries of the 6th millennium BCE. Representatives of this culture lived in caves at that time and of all the Neolithic technologies were familiar only with ceramics. This is typical of the people of the Subneolithic: hunter-gatherers came into contact with agricultural crops, but did not abandon their way of life. Cardial pottery then spread along the coast of Italy, with different variants on the west and east coasts. In the 5th millennium BCE, the Impresso culture spread to southeastern France and eastern Spain. Impressa (impresso) — (starting from 6,200–6,000 BCE) most of Italy, Adriatic, Sicily. Classic Cardial Pottery — (starting 5,900–5,400 BCE) extreme northwestern Italy (Liguria), Sardinia, Corsica, most of coastal Spain/Portugal, Morocco, Aquitaine. Epicardial Pottery  — (from 5,200 BCE) interior Spain (including the northern coast), southern France (except Aquitaine and coastal areas).” ref

17. Kfar HaHoresh aceramic (Israel) (Pre-Pottery Neolithic B) ref, and “12 fired clay samples and an unfired marl sample from the late 9th and early 8th millennium BCE site of Boncuklu Höyük (8,300–7,800 BCE) in central Turkey, contemporaneous PPNB ceramics found at Kfar HaHoresh in Israel.” ref, “Twenty-three pottery sherds have been defined as belonging to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B levels at Kfar HaHoresh. Twenty-one sherds represent a rather distinguishable fabric referred to as “KHH Ware”. Only two pottery sherds were not classified as KHH Ware, identified as representing Pre-Pottery Neolithic B pottery. KHH Ware is composed of low-fired marl unavailable on-site and vegetal material. KHH Ware was manufactured on a sporadic basis for limited purposes. Contextual associations indicate that KHH Ware may have had cultic significance. In some regions of the Near East (Zagros, Anatolia and the Northern Levant) pottery containers are first documented 7,750–7,250 BCE. Initially the pottery is rare and only from 7,250 BCE do pottery containers become more common. In the Levant pottery containers are the principal artefacts that distinguish the Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN), ca. 9,600–6,400 BCE, from the Pottery Neolithic (PN), 6,400–4,500 BCE  – at least from a nomenclatural point of view. This is not to say that pottery containers are totally absent in the PPN repertoire. In fact, more and more evidence of pottery containers are reported from Pre-Pottery Neolithic B layers at different sites in the Northern Levant. Evidence concerning the beginning of pottery container production in the Southern Levant remains very fragmentary. Sun-dried or low-fired pottery sherds dated to the PPNB have been reported from different sites in Transjordan, but these were subsequently identified as large installations – tabuns – ovens – or silos. Consequently, pottery containers are reported in the Southern Levant only with the onset of the PN period. Even if the exact time and place for the first appearance of pottery containers in the Southern Levant remains uncertain.” ref, and Sha’ar HaGolan (Israel) (6400–6000 BCE) “Sha’ar HaGolan is Sha’ar HaGolan is the largest, probably indicating its role as the Yarmukian center. The type site of the Yarmukian culture, a Pottery Neolithic culture that inhabited parts of Israel and Jordan, Yarmukian culture is notable for the discovery of a significant number of artistic objects, as well as some of the earliest pottery in the Southern Levant. At the Yarmukian culture site of ‘Ain Ghazal, located in Jordan, the early Pottery Neolithic period is dated from 6,400 to 5,000 BCE. Sha’ar HaGolan, zoomorphic and human female figurines are found, such as the 8000 years-old clay “Mother Goddess” figurine covered by a bracelet with a red bottom was found broken into 2 pieces. It was sculpted in a sitting position with big hips, a unique pointed hat and what is known as ‘coffee-bean’ eyes and a big nose.” ref 

18. Tell es-Sultan (Palestine: Jericho, West Bank) (10th millennium BCE to 586 BCE) “After the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A 8,500–7,500 BCE settlement phase, no use of pottery, there was a settlement hiatus of several centuries, then the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B settlement was founded on the eroded surface of the tell. This second settlement, established in 6,800 BCE, perhaps represents the work of an invading people who absorbed the original inhabitants into their dominant culture. Artifacts dating from this period include ten plastered human skulls, painted so as to reconstitute the individuals’ features. Also found stylized anthropomorphic plaster figures, almost life-size, anthropomorphic and theriomorphic clay figurines. Other items discovered included dishes and bowls carved from soft limestone.” ref, and  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tell_es-Sultan “Pottery was locally produced when technological features and architecture showed a cultural regression. The Pottery Neolithic A (6,000–5,000 BCE) village consisted of pit dwellings dug into the erosion layers (or even in previous Pre-Pottery Neolithic B strata), and flint and stone tools exhibit a cruder and less refined treatment in respect ofthose of Pre-Pottery Neolithic. Earliest pottery was characterized by coarse, straw-tempered ware, usually decorated by burnished red-on-cream painted decoration. Nonetheless, it represents an extraordinary innovation in the economy of this early rural community. Pottery Neolithic B (5,000–4,500 BCE) Jericho exhibits once again the shift to rectilinear architecture associated with the diffusion of a new kind of mud brick (bun-shaped). Nonetheless, Pottery Neolithic A and B layers produced a few remnants of plants and charcoal, thus suggesting that the Jerichoans were basically herdsmen and hunters during these periods. Pottery Neolithic is viewed as a culturally recessive period, when the site was slightly reduced in area and hosted a less developed village in respect of the preceding Pre-Pottery Neolithic.” ref

19. “Dotted wavy line and wavy line pottery have been discovered in archaeological sites across North and Eastern Africa. Wavy line pottery was characteristic of the early Mesolithic, while the dotted wavy line pottery was characteristic of the late Mesolithic. Some of the oldest evidence comes from the sites of Tagalagal and Adrar Bous 10 in Niger 10,000 BCE, and from Temet in Niger 8,600 BCE.” ref, and “African artisans produced hand-built pottery – for at least 10,000 to 15,000 years.” ref

20. Barcın Höyük (Turkey) (6600 to 6000 BCE) “The observed conceptual similarities between the pottery assemblages of Barcın Höyük and Çatalhöyük in Central Anatolia, especially in the second half of the seventh millennium BCE, have often been regarded in the context of an overland expansion model, which has also been proposed for Ulucak on the Aegean coast of Anatolia. However, both the architectural style and the composition of the faunal packages differ between these regions, challenging the interpretation of similarities between the pottery assemblages. Although the development of cooking ware is seen in Central Anatolia at about the same time as the beginning of the settlement at Barcın Höyük, the use of crushed calcite temper may be specific to the eastern Marmara region and adjacent inland areas. The use of crushed calcite temper may therefore represent a local innovation.” ref “173 organic residues obtained from 805 Neolithic potsherds and suggest that bowls and four-lugged pots may have been preferred containers for processing milk. The discovery of abundant milk residues even among the earliest ceramics indicates that the pioneer farmers arrived in the region already with the knowhow of dairying and milk processing.” ref, ref

21. Sang-i Chakmak(Iran) (7th millennium BCE/6500) ref, ref “Most of the decorated pottery displays geometric patterns such as crossed lines, and the horizontal and vertical parallel lines drawn in red or dark brown against a creamy or reddish background. This is a site in northeastern Iran with the ceramics of the upper, younger layers that show animal motifs. There are also conical clay objects, spindles, animal statuettes made of clay or stone, and clay figurines. A skull of a young woman was also found; it was covered with a decorated pot of a type known from the site of Tepe Sialk (Central Iran) (6000–3000 BCE). The objects found generally show similarities to the lowest layer of Yarim Tepe and, above all, to the Jeitun culture (Neolithic period in southern Turkmenistan). Various types of the earliest Jeitun artefacts, such as clay figurines, decorated ceramics, and small stone axes, show similarities with those of the early agricultural Neolithic sites in the Zagros Mountains, such as Jarmo (Iraq). Jeitun culture may have begun prior to 7000 BCE, judging by the age of Sang-i Chakmak, the earliest settlement where such artefacts are found. In the same area of the Gorgan Plain, other related sites are Yarim Tepe (Iran), and Tureng Tepe. It is possible that the later Jeitun influence expanded to the south, across the Kopet Dag mountains to Kermanshah Province and Luristan, to the sites such as Tepe GuranTepe Sarab, and Ganj Dareh.” ref, ref

22. Tell el-‘Oueili (Iraq) (6,500-5,400 BCE – abandoned before 3,000 BCE) “In the south, corresponding to the area that would later be known as Sumer, the entire Ubaid period extends from ca. 6500 to 3800 BCE. The oldest known Ubaid site, Tell el-‘Oueili, which ranges from Ubaid 0 (6500-5400 BCE) to Late Ubaid 4 (4900–4350 BCE) and the site was occupied into the Uruk Period. Occupation layers predating those of Eridu, making Tell el-‘Oueili the earliest known Ubaid settlement in Lower Mesopotamia. In central and northern Iraq, the Ubaid culture was preceded by the Hassunaand Samarraref, ref, and Tell Abu Shahrain (Eridu) (Iraq) (5,500-5,300 BCE – abandoned before 6,00 BCE) “Ubaid 1, also called “Eridu style,” dates to 5900/5,500–5200 BCE, and at Eridu and Tell al-‘Ubaid, Ubaid pottery was found. Its characteristic style was a black-on-buff painted ware. Eridu is traditionally considered the earliest city in southern Mesopotamia based on the Sumerian King List. Located 24 km (15 mi) south-southwest of the ancient site of Ur, Eridu was the southernmost of a conglomeration of Sumerian cities that grew around temples, almost in sight of one another. Among the finds were a Ubaid period terracotta boat model, complete with a socket amidship for a mast and hole for stays and rudder, bevel-rimmed bowls, and a “lizard type” figurine like those found in a sounding under the Royal Cemetery of Ur. Soundings in the cemetery showed it to have about 1000 graves, all from the end of the Ubaid period. The first platform at Eridu dates to Ubaid 4,500–4,000 BCE, and the “Temple Sequence” starts. These sequence of “Palace-like” or “Temple-Like” buildings appears to be the first occurrence of such structures in the region.” ref, ref

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref 
Bayesian analyses of radiocarbon dates suggest multiple origins of ceramic technology in Early Holocene Africa
“Ceramic technology emerged and spread in Saharan Africa between the end of the 11th and the beginning of the 10th millennium cal BP during the so-called African Humid Period. This innovation is linked to hunter-gatherer-fisher groups adapting to changing and increased ecological productivity. Several putative points of origin and the resulting corridors of diffusion of this technology have been suggested in the literature, but there is currently no consensus on whether ceramics in this region originated as a single or multiple independent episodes of innovation. Researchers synthesize the available radiocarbon evidence associated with the presence and absence of ceramic technology in Early Holocene Africa and statistically model spatio-temporal diffusion processes using different combinations of putative origin points. The result of our model comparison provides support for either a dual or triple-origin model, with core areas potentially in the Central Sahara, Nile Valley, and West Africa. These findings refine current debates on early pottery innovation, highlighting the role of localized technological choices, environmental factors, and interregional interactions in shaping its spread.” ref 
“Prehistory of Sudan: “By the eighth millennium BCE, people of a Neolithic culture had settled into a sedentary way of life there in fortified mud-brick villages, where they supplemented hunting and fishing on the Nile with grain gathering and cattle herding. During the fifth millennium BCE, migrations from the drying Sahara brought neolithic people into the Nile Valley along with agriculture. In eastern Sudan, the Butana Group appears around 4000 BCE. These people produced simple decorated pottery, lived in round huts, and were most likely herdsmen, hunters, but also consumed land snails and there is evidence for some agriculture.” ref
“Neolithic cattle herding in Sudan, dating back as early as 10,000 years ago in the Central Nile Valley, involved early domestication or management of cattle in a “Green Sahara” environment. Early Holocene cattle-based pastoralism is the oldest form of productive economy in Africa, which precedes agriculture. Despite the idea of independent African domestication of cattle remaining controversial, genetic input from African aurochs during the long, discontinuous domestication process is possible. Secondary exploitation of cattle appears much later, with the earliest evidence of dairying from the central Sahara at around 6100 years ago. Cattle, stone monuments, and rock art appear to be important elements of African prehistoric pastoral societies, but they rarely occur together. The Messak plateau (SW Libya) in the central Sahara represents an outstanding exception, with engravings portraying pastoral activities, including vivid depictions of cattle sacrifices, which are common and often spatially related to stone monuments. Our data convey to suggest that during the middle Holocene (5200–3800 BCE or 7,200 to 5,800 years ago) the Messak plateau homed the highly formalized local expression of a wider ideological phenomenon centred on domestic cattle. The slaughtering of bovines was an impressive enduring ritual, which should be considered as a central part of the socio-cultural system of Messak Middle Pastoral herders.” ref
“Letti Desert 2 (LTD2) site in North Sudan, dating to the mid- 8th millennium BCE. Due to the very limited collection of osteological and osteometric data, the findings from Letti cannot provide final proof for the local domestication of cattle in Africa. It would be inaccurate to characterize the Early Holocene communities of Letti as pastoralists, but we do see features of nomadism in them, and a close association with herds of (wild?) cattle leads us to identify these groups as proto-pastoralists. In the 7th millennium BCE, which was significantly later than the arrival of the hypothetical proto-pastoralists we have introduced to the debate, settled communities appeared in the region. Both the proto-pastoralist communities and those described as Mesolithic were producing ceramic vessels, albeit representing markedly different traditions (Mesolithic “Karmakol” ware commonly tempered with chaff or mica – absent in LTD2 assemblage).” ref
“The introduction of domestic animals to Central Sudan must have affected the life of the inhabitants. Current knowledge of the chronology and the relations between Sudanese and Saharan areas suggests that domestic stock were introduced from the Sahara as it became drier. Cattle, sheep, and goats appeared around 6000 BCE. Local assemblages of lithics and pottery show continuity, indicating that any movement of Saharan people into the region was small-scale, and culture contact was more important to the socio-economic change than migration. Pastoral intensification and a decrease in wild animal use are also evident at some sites in the Middle Nile Valley by the mid-5th millennium BCE. Despite these developments, the spread of herding was patchy.” ref

“Evidence for the social organization of the people of the Neolithic in Central Sudan will be limited to that derived from burial information. Although the hypothetical social classes reflected in the graves were not observed in the settlements, currently available evidence seems to indicate that the burial grounds at el Kadada and Kadero I illustrate well the process of the increasing concentration of goods and power by a social “elite”- toward the end of the Neolithic. It is clear that the social structure in the Central Sudan during the Neolithic period exhibited more or less inseparable economic and settlement patterns, which are in turn witness to developmental stages extending from the Early Neolithic to the complex picture of the Late Neolithic.” ref

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

There are many similarities between Asia Minor/Turkey pottery and early Greek Neolithic pottery

Biblos pottery 6,400-5,800 BCE “Cardial Ware culture”

“Ceramic decoration evolves to flame motifs toward the end of the Sesklo culture. Pottery of this “classic” Sesklo style was also used in Western Macedonia, as at Servia. That there are many similarities between the rare Asia Minor/Turkey pottery and early Greek Neolithic pottery was acknowledged when investigations were made regarding whether these settlers could be migrants from Asia Minor/Turkey, but such similarities seem to exist among all early pottery found in Near Eastern regions. The repertoire of shapes is not very different, but the Asia Minor/Turkey vessels demonstrate significant differences. They seem to be deeper than their Thessalian counterparts. Shallow, slightly open bowls are characteristic of the Sesklo culture, but are absent in Anatolian settlements. Use of a ring base was almost unknown in Anatolia/Turkey; flat and plano-convex bases were worked instead. Altogether, the appearance of the vessels is different. The very rare examples of pottery from levels XII and XI at Catal Hoyuk closely resemble the shape of the very coarse earthenware of Early Neolithic I from Sesklo, but the paste is significantly different, having a partly-vegetable temper, and this pottery is contemporaneous, not a predecessor, of the better-made products in the Thessalian material.” ref

“Early Neolithic (late phase) corresponding to the PNA of Tell es-Sultan (Jericho) IX (also Yarmukian) between 6,400 and 5,800 BCE, represented by potterysickle blades, figurines and small points; Middle Neolithic corresponding to the PNB of Tell es-Sultan (Jericho) VIII and represented by pottery, dated between 5800 and 5300 BCE; Late Neolithic corresponding to the Middle Chalcolithic of Beth Shean and represented by pottery, stone vesselssiloschamber tombs and seals, dated between 5,300 and 4,500 BCE.” ref

“The initial Late Neolithic ceramic period is thought to be roughly 7,000–6,700 BCE. These earliest pottery traditions may be known in literature as ‘Initial Pottery Neolithic’ in the Balikh River area of Syria and Turkey, for example Tell Sabi Abyad. Or it may be known as ‘Halula I’ in the Syrian Euphrates area; the main site is Tell Halula. Also, it may be known as ‘Rouj 2a’ in Northern Levantine Rouj basin (Idlib, Syria). Neolithic pottery may well have arrived as a full-blown technological set from more northerly regions. Pottery appears to have become ubiquitous in the southern Levant by late in the 6th millennium BCE and remained as an integral part of human material culture up to the present. The earliest PN phase is associated with the site of Sha’ar HaGolan in the Jordan Valley. This pottery is sometimes called “Yarmukian Ware”. The diagnostic pottery typical of this period is somewhat sophisticated.” ref

“Early Neolithic impressed pottery is found in the Levant, and certain parts of Anatolia, including Mezraa-Teleilat, and in North Africa at Tunus-Redeyef, Tunisia. Impressed pottery also appears in Egypt. Along the East Mediterranean coast, impressed ware has been found in North SyriaPalestine, and Lebanon. Older Neolithic cultures existed already at this time in eastern Greece and Crete, apparently having arrived from Anatolia, but they appear distinct from the Cardial or impressed ware culture. The ceramic tradition in the central Balkans also remained distinct from that along the Adriatic coastline in both style and manufacturing techniques for almost 1,000 years from the 6th millennium BCE.” ref

“This suggests a seafaring expansion by planting colonies along the coast. This pottery style gives its name to the main culture Cardium pottery culture or Cardial culture, which also can be referred to as impressed ware culture, which eventually extended from the Adriatic sea to the Atlantic coasts of Portugal and south to Morocco. Maternal genetic affinity between people of the Linear Pottery Culture and Cardium pottery with earlier peoples of the Near Eastern Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, including the rare mtDNA (maternal) basal haplogroup N*, and suggested that Neolithic period was initiated by seafaring colonists from the Near East. 6 Cardials buried in Spain c. 5470–5220 BCE mtDNA extracted belonged to the maternal haplogroups K1a2aX2cH4a1a (2 samples), H3 and K1a4a1. Researchers Suggest that the Cardials and peoples of the Linear Pottery Culture were descended from a common farming population in the Balkans, which had subsequently migrated further westwards into Europe along the Mediterranean coast and Danube river respectively. Among modern populations, the Cardials were found to be most closely related to Sardinians and Basque people.” ref

“Rare unclassified haplogroup N* has been found among fossils belonging to the Cardial and Epicardial culture (Cardium pottery) and the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B. A rare unclassified form of N has also been reported in modern Algeria. Haplogroup N1a – Arabian Peninsula and Northeast Africa. It is also found in Central Asia and Southern Siberia. This branch is well attested in ancient people from various cultures of Neolithic Europe, from Hungary to Spain, and among the earliest farmers of AnatoliaHaplogroup N1b – found in the Middle East, Egypt (Gurna), the Caucasus, and Europe. N1b1b1 – found in Ashkenazi Jews and other populations, formerly called N1b2. It is believed to be of Middle Eastern origin, but over time, it became concentrated in Ashkenazi Jews.” ref

N1a originated in the Near East  12,000 to 32,000 years ago. Specifically, the Arabian Peninsula is postulated as the geographic origin of N1a. This supposition is based on the relatively high frequency and genetic diversity of N1a in modern populations of the peninsula. Exact origins and migration patterns of this haplogroup are still subject of some debate. Two main competing scenarios exist for the spread of the Neolithic package from the Near East to Europe: demic diffusion (in which agriculture was brought by farmers) or cultural diffusion (in which agriculture was spread through the passage of ideas). N1a became particularly prominent in this debate when a team led by Wolfgang Haak analyzed skeletons from Linear Pottery Culture sites.” ref

“The Linear Pottery Culture is credited with the first farming communities in Central Europe, marking the beginning of Neolithic Europe in the region some 7500 years ago. As of 2010, mitochondrial DNA analysis has been conducted on 42 specimens from five locations. Seven of these ancient individuals were found to belong to haplogroup N1a. N1a was not identified in any of the hunter-gatherer fossils, indicating a genetic distinction between Early European Farmers and late European hunter-gatherers. A genetic and phylogeographic analysis of N1a. Based on the results, they conclude that some of the LBK samples were indigenous to Europe while others may have resulted from ‘leapfrog’ colonization.” ref

“A genetic discontinuity between ancient and modern Europeans could be attributed to demic diffusion, cultural diffusion, or long-distance matrimonial exchanges, all equally plausible explanations for the current genetic findings. Seven of 42 skeletons from Linear Pottery Culture (Linearbandkeramik) sites were found to be members of the N1a haplogroup (see Neolithic European). N1a was also identified in skeletal remains within a 6200-year-old megalithic long mound near Prissé-la-Charrière, France. Haplogroup N1a is widely distributed throughout Europe, Northeast Africa, the Near East, and Central Asia.” ref

“It is divided into the European/Central Asian and African/South Asian branches based on specific genetic markers. The N1 subclade has also been found in various other fossils that were analysed for ancient DNA, including specimens associated with the Starčevo (N1a1a1, Alsónyék-Bátaszék, Mérnöki telep, 1/3 or 33%), Linearbandkeramik (N1a1a1a3, Szemely-Hegyes, 1/1 or 100%; N1a1b/N1a1a3/N1a1a1a2/N1a1a1/N1a1a1a, Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld, 6/22 or ~27%), Alföld Linear Pottery (N1a1a1, Hejőkürt-Lidl, 1/2 or 50%), Transdanubian Late Neolithic (N1a1a1a, Apc-Berekalja, 1/1 or 100%), Protoboleráz (N1a1a1a3, Abony, Turjányos-dűlő, 1/4 or 25%), Iberia Early Neolithic cultures (N1a1a1, Els Trocs, 1/4 or 25%),[14] RinaldoneGaudo Eneolithic cultures (N1a1a1a3, Monte San Biagio, 1/1 or 100%).” ref

Ancient mDNA “N1a1a1” and Pottery?

Bon005 – Boncuklu Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 10,220 years ago Turkey – Central Anatolia ref

Bon004 – Boncuklu Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 10,076 years ago Turkey – Central Anatolia ref

ZHAG – Boncuklu Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 9,900 years ago Turkey – Central Anatolia ref

People who lived in ancient settlement in central Turkey migrated to Europe: archaeologists

“10,300-year-old Boncuklu Höyük settlement in Turkey revealed that the people who lived in the settlement migrated to Europe. And the Boncuklu Höyük settlement was established a thousand years before Çatalhöyük, so is the ancestor of later Çatalhöyük.” ref

Ash040 – Aşıklı Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 9,875 years ago Turkey – Central Anatolia ref

CCH144 – Çatalhöyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 8,808 years ago Turkey – Central Anatolia ref

I1096 – Barcın Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 8,300 years ago Turkey – Northwest Anatolia ref

Bar25 – Barcın Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 8,295 years ago Turkey – Northwest Anatolia ref

Tep004 – Tepecik-Çiftlik Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 8,237 years ago Turkey – Northwest Anatolia ref

Tep006 – Tepecik-Çiftlik Höyük mtDNA N1a1a1 around 8,099 years ago Turkey – Northwest Anatolia ref

I0725 – Mentese mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,950 years ago Turkey – South-Western corner, on the Aegean Sea ref

I0174 – Alsonyek-Bataszek mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,558 years ago Hungary – Starcevo ref (Starčevo–Körös–Criș culture: 6,200 – 4,500 BCE or around 8,223-6,523 years ago)

“Starčevo culture of Southeastern Europe originates in the spread of the Neolithic package of peoples and technological innovations including farming and ceramics from Anatolia to the area of Sesklo. The Starčevo culture marks its spread to the inland Balkan peninsula as the Cardial ware culture did along the Adriatic coastline. It forms part of the wider Starčevo–Körös–Criş culture which gave rise to the central European Linear Pottery culture c. 700 years after the initial spread of Neolithic farmers towards the northern Balkans.” ref

Klein1 – Kleinhadersd mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,500 years ago Austria – LBK/AVK ref (Linear Pottery culture *LBK*: 5,500–4,500 BCE or around 7,523-6,523 years ago)

UZZ74 – Grotta dell’Uzzo, Sicily mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,223 years ago Italy – Stentinello I ref (Stentinello culture: dated to the 5th millennium BCE: 5000 to 4000 BCE or around 7,023-6,023 years ago)

I0412 – Els Trocs, Bisaurri, Huesca, Aragón mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,177 years ago Spain – Epicardial ref (Cardium/Cardial–Epicardial pottery culture: 6400 – 5500 BCE or around 8,423-7,023 years ago)

A Common Genetic Origin for Early Farmers from Mediterranean Cardial and Central European LBK Cultures

“Fernández et al. 2014 found traces of maternal genetic affinity between people of the Linear Pottery Culture and Cardium pottery with earlier peoples of the Near Eastern Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, including the rare mtDNA (maternal) basal haplogroup N*, and suggested that Neolithic period was initiated by seafaring colonists from the Near East. Mathieson et al. 2018 examined three Cardials buried at the Zemunica Cave near Bisko in modern-day Croatia c. 5800 BCE the three samples of mtDNA extracted belonged to the maternal haplogroups H1, K1b1a, and N1a1.” ref

ref

“Main cultures of the earliest Neolithic of Central and Western Europe around 6,000–5,500 cal BCE.” ref

“Research suggested Cardial and Linear Pottery Cultures were descended from a common farming population in the Balkans.” ref

SMH011 – Baden-Württemberg mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,127 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture/LBK_SMH ref

XN205 – Baden-Württemberg mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,100 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture/LBK_SMH ref

XN165 – Baden-Württemberg mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,099 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture/LBK_SMH ref

I0057 – Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,070 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture ref

SCH004 – Baden-Württemberg mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,050 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture ref

I2008 – Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,041 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture ref

OBN006 – Bas-Rhin mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,026 years ago France (Northeastern France near the border of Germany) – France_MN_OBN_C ref

XN215 – Baden-Württemberg mtDNA N1a1a1 around 7,010 years ago Germany – Linear Pottery Culture/LBK_SMH ref

I2379 – Hejőkürt-Lidl logisztikai központ mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,984 years ago Hungary – ALPc_Tiszadob_MN ref

I10942 – Europa 1, Gibraltar mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,950 years ago Gibraltar (southern tip of the Iberian Peninsula/bordered to the north by Spain) – SW_Iberia_EN ref

ALE 16 – Alsónyék-Elkerülő 2. Site mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,889 years ago Hungary – Sopot_LN ref

SZEH2 – Szemely-Hegye mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,855 years ago Hungary – Sopot_LN ref

ALE16 – Alsónyék-elkerülő 2. lh. mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,850 years ago Hungary – Sopot_MN ref

I0175 – Bátaszék-Lajvérpuszta mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,650 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_Neolithic ref

BAM27 – Alsónyék-Bátaszék, Mérnöki telep mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,580 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

BAL16 – Bátaszék-Lajvér mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

BAL26 – Bátaszék-Lajvér mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

CSAT1 – Csabdi-Télizöldes mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

CSAT20 – Csabdi-Télizöldes mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

CSAT29 – Csabdi-Télizöldes mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

MORT12 – Mórágy-Tűzkődomb, B1 mtDNA N1a1a1 around 6,525 years ago Hungary – Lengyel_LN ref

N18 – Pikutkowo mtDNA N1a1a1 around 5,459 years ago Poland – Funnel Beaker ref (Funnel Beaker culture: 4300 – 2800 BCE or around 6,323-4,823 years ago north-central Europe)

“Genetic finds in the Funnelbeaker (TrB) culture, Malmström et al. 2015 examined 9 skeletons from Resmo, Sweden, and Gökhem, Sweden c. 3300-2600 BCE. The 8 samples of mtDNA extracted belonged to various subtypes of maternal haplogroup J, H/R, N, K, and T. The examined Funnelbeakers were closely related to Central European farmers, and different from people of the contemporary Pitted Ware culture. The striking diversity of the maternal lineages suggested that maternal kinship was of little importance in Funnelbeaker society. The evidence suggested that the Neolithization of Scandinavia was accompanied by significant human migration.” ref

But is Atlantis real?

No. Atlantis (an allegory: “fake story” interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning) can’t be found any more than one can locate the Jolly Green Giant that is said to watch over frozen vegetables. Lol

ref

May Reason Set You Free

There are a lot of truly great things said by anarchists in history, and also some deeply vile things, too, from not supporting Women’s rights to Anti-Semitism. There are those who also reject those supporting women’s rights as well as fight anti-Semitism. This is why I push reason as my only master, not anarchist thinking, though anarchism, to me, should see all humans everywhere as equal in dignity and rights.

We—Cory and Damien—are following the greatness that can be found in anarchist thinking.

As an Anarchist Educator, Damien strives to teach the plain truth. Damien does not support violence as my method to change. Rather, I choose education that builds Enlightenment and Empowerment. I champion Dignity and Equality. We rise by helping each other. What is the price of a tear? What is the cost of a smile? How can we see clearly when others pay the cost of our indifference and fear? We should help people in need. Why is that so hard for some people? Rich Ghouls must End. Damien wants “billionaires” to stop being a thing. Tax then into equality. To Damien, there is no debate, Capitalism is unethical. Moreover, as an Anarchist Educator, Damien knows violence is not the way to inspire lasting positive change. But we are not limited to violence, we have education, one of the most lasting and powerful ways to improve the world. We empower the world by championing Truth and its supporters.

Anarchism and Education

“Various alternatives to education and their problems have been proposed by anarchists which have gone from alternative education systems and environments, self-education, advocacy of youth and children rights, and freethought activism.” ref

“Historical accounts of anarchist educational experiments to explore how their pedagogical practices, organization, and content constituted a radical alternative to mainstream forms of educational provision in different historical periods.” ref

“The Ferrer school was an early 20th century libertarian school inspired by the anarchist pedagogy of Francisco Ferrer. He was a proponent of rationalist, secular education that emphasized reason, dignity, self-reliance, and scientific observation. The Ferrer movement’s philosophy had two distinct tendencies: non-didactic freedom from dogma and the more didactic fostering of counter-hegemonic beliefs. Towards non-didactic freedom from dogma, and fulfilled the child-centered tradition.” ref

Teach Real History: all our lives depend on it.

#SupportRealArchaeology

#RejectPseudoarchaeology

Damien sees lies about history as crimes against humanity. And we all must help humanity by addressing “any and all” who make harmful lies about history.

Dylan Violette (CopperViolette) (in Maine) and Damien Marie AtHope (in Texas) seek to learn more about the indigenous peoples of the Americas (First Nations/Native Americans) where they both live.

Native Americans in Maine are: collectively known as the Wabanaki or “People of the Dawnland.” Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians (Maliseet/Wolastoqiyik), Miꞌkmaq Nation (concentrated in Northern Maine, specifically Aroostook County), Passamaquoddy Tribe (with communities at Motahkomikuk/Indian Township and Sipayik/Pleasant Point), and Penobscot Nation (headquartered on Indian Island).

Native Americans in Texas: More than 30 organizations claim to represent historic tribes within Texas; however, these groups are unrecognized, meaning they do not meet the minimum criteria of federally recognized tribes and are not state-recognized tribes. There are three federally recognized tribes in Texas, each with their own reservation: 

  • Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas: Located near Livingston in the Big Thicket area, the reservation is the oldest in Texas.
  • Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas: Based in Eagle Pass, the tribe maintains strong cultural ties and resides on a reservation along the Rio Grande on the U.S.-Mexico border.
  • Ysleta del Sur Pueblo (Tigua): Located in El Paso, this is one of the oldest continuously inhabited communities in Texas, established in 1682. 

Before European settlement, numerous tribes lived across the varied Texas landscape, developing distinct cultures

Southeastern & East Texas: The Caddo built large, permanent villages and elaborate ceremonial mounds, developing extensive trade networks. Other groups included the Atakapa and Wichita peoples.

Gulf Coast: Tribes like the Karankawa and Coahuiltecans were semi-nomadic, adapting to the coastal environment through fishing, hunting, and gathering.

Plains (North & West Texas): The powerful, horse-mounted Comanche and Kiowa dominated a vast territory known as the Comanchería, hunting bison and conducting trade and raids. The Apache, including the Lipan and Mescalero groups, were also prominent in West and Central Texas before being pushed out by the Comanche and later by Anglo settlers.

West Texas: The Jumano people lived along rivers and practiced farming and extensive trading before eventually joining Apache groups.

Damien and Dylan live around a 33 hr. drive apart.

Dylan Violette (CopperViolette) (in Maine) is close to the Mi’kmaq. He passes by their reservation whenever he heads south (the nearest city is that way; He is almost in the middle of nowhere). 

Damien Marie AtHope (in Texas) lives in Corpus Christi, which is in the Gulf Coast Tribes area, like the Karankawa and Coahuiltecans. (I was living in Florida, but moved to Texas)

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref

My favorite “Graham Hancock” Quote?

“In what archaeologists have studied, yes, we can say there is NO Evidence of an advanced civilization.” – (Time 1:27) Joe Rogan Experience #2136 – Graham Hancock & Flint Dibble

Help the Valentine fight against pseudoarchaeology!!!
 
In a world of “Hancocks” supporting evidence lacking claims, be a “John Hoopes” supporting what evidence explains.
 
#SupportEvidenceNotWishfullThinking
 
Graham Hancock: @Graham__Hancock
John Hoopes: @KUHoopes

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

People don’t commonly teach religious history, even that of their own claimed religion. No, rather they teach a limited “pro their religion” history of their religion from a religious perspective favorable to the religion of choice. 

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

Do you truly think “Religious Belief” is only a matter of some personal choice?

Do you not see how coercive one’s world of choice is limited to the obvious hereditary belief, in most religious choices available to the child of religious parents or caregivers? Religion is more commonly like a family, culture, society, etc. available belief that limits the belief choices of the child and that is when “Religious Belief” is not only a matter of some personal choice and when it becomes hereditary faith, not because of the quality of its alleged facts or proposed truths but because everyone else important to the child believes similarly so they do as well simply mimicking authority beliefs handed to them. Because children are raised in religion rather than being presented all possible choices but rather one limited dogmatic brand of “Religious Belief” where children only have a choice of following the belief as instructed, and then personally claim the faith hereditary belief seen in the confirming to the belief they have held themselves all their lives. This is obvious in statements asked and answered by children claiming a faith they barely understand but they do understand that their family believes “this or that” faith, so they feel obligated to believe it too. While I do agree that “Religious Belief” should only be a matter of some personal choice, it rarely is… End Hereditary Religion!

Opposition to Imposed Hereditary Religion

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refrefrefref 

Animism: Respecting the Living World by Graham Harvey 

“How have human cultures engaged with and thought about animals, plants, rocks, clouds, and other elements in their natural surroundings? Do animals and other natural objects have a spirit or soul? What is their relationship to humans? In this new study, Graham Harvey explores current and past animistic beliefs and practices of Native Americans, Maori, Aboriginal Australians, and eco-pagans. He considers the varieties of animism found in these cultures as well as their shared desire to live respectfully within larger natural communities. Drawing on his extensive casework, Harvey also considers the linguistic, performative, ecological, and activist implications of these different animisms.” ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

We are like believing machines; we vacuum up ideas, like Velcro sticks to almost everything. We accumulate beliefs that we allow to negatively influence our lives, often without realizing it. Our willingness must be to alter skewed beliefs that impede our balance or reason, which allows us to achieve new positive thinking and accurate outcomes.

My thoughts on Religion Evolution with external links for more info:

“Religion is an Evolved Product” and Yes, Religion is Like Fear Given Wings…

Atheists talk about gods and religions for the same reason doctors talk about cancer, they are looking for a cure, or a firefighter talks about fires because they burn people and they care to stop them. We atheists too often feel a need to help the victims of mental slavery, held in the bondage that is the false beliefs of gods and the conspiracy theories of reality found in religions.

“Understanding Religion Evolution: Animism, Totemism, Shamanism, Paganism & Progressed organized religion”

Understanding Religion Evolution:

“An Archaeological/Anthropological Understanding of Religion Evolution”

It seems ancient peoples had to survived amazing threats in a “dangerous universe (by superstition perceived as good and evil),” and human “immorality or imperfection of the soul” which was thought to affect the still living, leading to ancestor worship. This ancestor worship presumably led to the belief in supernatural beings, and then some of these were turned into the belief in gods. This feeble myth called gods were just a human conceived “made from nothing into something over and over, changing, again and again, taking on more as they evolve, all the while they are thought to be special,” but it is just supernatural animistic spirit-belief perceived as sacred.

 

Quick Evolution of Religion?

Pre-Animism (at least 300,000 years ago) pre-religion is a beginning that evolves into later Animism. So, Religion as we think of it, to me, all starts in a general way with Animism (Africa: 100,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in supernatural powers/spirits), then this is physically expressed in or with Totemism (Europe: 50,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in mythical relationship with powers/spirits through a totem item), which then enlists a full-time specific person to do this worship and believed interacting Shamanism (Siberia/Russia: 30,000 years ago) (theoretical belief in access and influence with spirits through ritual), and then there is the further employment of myths and gods added to all the above giving you Paganism (Turkey: 12,000 years ago) (often a lot more nature-based than most current top world religions, thus hinting to their close link to more ancient religious thinking it stems from). My hypothesis is expressed with an explanation of the building of a theatrical house (modern religions development). Progressed organized religion (Egypt: 5,000 years ago)  with CURRENT “World” RELIGIONS (after 4,000 years ago).

Historically, in large city-state societies (such as Egypt or Iraq) starting around 5,000 years ago culminated to make religion something kind of new, a sociocultural-governmental-religious monarchy, where all or at least many of the people of such large city-state societies seem familiar with and committed to the existence of “religion” as the integrated life identity package of control dynamics with a fixed closed magical doctrine, but this juggernaut integrated religion identity package of Dogmatic-Propaganda certainly did not exist or if developed to an extent it was highly limited in most smaller prehistoric societies as they seem to lack most of the strong control dynamics with a fixed closed magical doctrine (magical beliefs could be at times be added or removed). Many people just want to see developed religious dynamics everywhere even if it is not. Instead, all that is found is largely fragments until the domestication of religion.

Religions, as we think of them today, are a new fad, even if they go back to around 6,000 years in the timeline of human existence, this amounts to almost nothing when seen in the long slow evolution of religion at least around 70,000 years ago with one of the oldest ritual worship. Stone Snake of South Africa: “first human worship” 70,000 years ago. This message of how religion and gods among them are clearly a man-made thing that was developed slowly as it was invented and then implemented peace by peace discrediting them all. Which seems to be a simple point some are just not grasping how devastating to any claims of truth when we can see the lie clearly in the archeological sites.

I wish people fought as hard for the actual values as they fight for the group/clan names political or otherwise they think support values. Every amount spent on war is theft to children in need of food or the homeless kept from shelter.

Here are several of my blog posts on history:

I am not an academic. I am a revolutionary that teaches in public, in places like social media, and in the streets. I am not a leader by some title given but from my commanding leadership style of simply to start teaching everywhere to everyone, all manner of positive education. 

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

To me, Animism starts in Southern Africa, then to West Europe, and becomes Totemism. Another split goes near the Russia and Siberia border becoming Shamanism, which heads into Central Europe meeting up with Totemism, which also had moved there, mixing the two which then heads to Lake Baikal in Siberia. From there this Shamanism-Totemism heads to Turkey where it becomes Paganism.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref 

Not all “Religions” or “Religious Persuasions” have a god(s) but

All can be said to believe in some imaginary beings or imaginary things like spirits, afterlives, etc.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref 

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Religion is a cultural product and moved in cultural migrations.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Low Gods “Earth” or Tutelary deity and High Gods “Sky” or Supreme deity

“An Earth goddess is a deification of the Earth. Earth goddesses are often associated with the “chthonic” deities of the underworldKi and Ninhursag are Mesopotamian earth goddesses. In Greek mythology, the Earth is personified as Gaia, corresponding to Roman Terra, Indic Prithvi/Bhūmi, etc. traced to an “Earth Mother” complementary to the “Sky Father” in Proto-Indo-European religionEgyptian mythology exceptionally has a sky goddess and an Earth god.” ref

“A mother goddess is a goddess who represents or is a personification of naturemotherhoodfertilitycreationdestruction or who embodies the bounty of the Earth. When equated with the Earth or the natural world, such goddesses are sometimes referred to as Mother Earth or as the Earth Mother. In some religious traditions or movements, Heavenly Mother (also referred to as Mother in Heaven or Sky Mother) is the wife or feminine counterpart of the Sky father or God the Father.” ref

Any masculine sky god is often also king of the gods, taking the position of patriarch within a pantheon. Such king gods are collectively categorized as “sky father” deities, with a polarity between sky and earth often being expressed by pairing a “sky father” god with an “earth mother” goddess (pairings of a sky mother with an earth father are less frequent). A main sky goddess is often the queen of the gods and may be an air/sky goddess in her own right, though she usually has other functions as well with “sky” not being her main. In antiquity, several sky goddesses in ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Near East were called Queen of Heaven. Neopagans often apply it with impunity to sky goddesses from other regions who were never associated with the term historically. The sky often has important religious significance. Many religions, both polytheistic and monotheistic, have deities associated with the sky.” ref

“In comparative mythology, sky father is a term for a recurring concept in polytheistic religions of a sky god who is addressed as a “father”, often the father of a pantheon and is often either a reigning or former King of the Gods. The concept of “sky father” may also be taken to include Sun gods with similar characteristics, such as Ra. The concept is complementary to an “earth mother“. “Sky Father” is a direct translation of the Vedic Dyaus Pita, etymologically descended from the same Proto-Indo-European deity name as the Greek Zeûs Pater and Roman Jupiter and Germanic Týr, Tir or Tiwaz, all of which are reflexes of the same Proto-Indo-European deity’s name, *Dyēus Ph₂tḗr. While there are numerous parallels adduced from outside of Indo-European mythology, there are exceptions (e.g. In Egyptian mythology, Nut is the sky mother and Geb is the earth father).” ref

Tutelary deity

“A tutelary (also tutelar) is a deity or spirit who is a guardian, patron, or protector of a particular place, geographic feature, person, lineage, nation, culture, or occupation. The etymology of “tutelary” expresses the concept of safety and thus of guardianship. In late Greek and Roman religion, one type of tutelary deity, the genius, functions as the personal deity or daimon of an individual from birth to death. Another form of personal tutelary spirit is the familiar spirit of European folklore.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) iKorean shamanismjangseung and sotdae were placed at the edge of villages to frighten off demons. They were also worshiped as deities. Seonangshin is the patron deity of the village in Korean tradition and was believed to embody the SeonangdangIn Philippine animism, Diwata or Lambana are deities or spirits that inhabit sacred places like mountains and mounds and serve as guardians. Such as: Maria Makiling is the deity who guards Mt. Makiling and Maria Cacao and Maria Sinukuan. In Shinto, the spirits, or kami, which give life to human bodies come from nature and return to it after death. Ancestors are therefore themselves tutelaries to be worshiped. And similarly, Native American beliefs such as Tonás, tutelary animal spirit among the Zapotec and Totems, familial or clan spirits among the Ojibwe, can be animals.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) in Austronesian beliefs such as: Atua (gods and spirits of the Polynesian peoples such as the Māori or the Hawaiians), Hanitu (Bunun of Taiwan‘s term for spirit), Hyang (KawiSundaneseJavanese, and Balinese Supreme Being, in ancient Java and Bali mythology and this spiritual entity, can be either divine or ancestral), Kaitiaki (New Zealand Māori term used for the concept of guardianship, for the sky, the sea, and the land), Kawas (mythology) (divided into 6 groups: gods, ancestors, souls of the living, spirits of living things, spirits of lifeless objects, and ghosts), Tiki (Māori mythologyTiki is the first man created by either Tūmatauenga or Tāne and represents deified ancestors found in most Polynesian cultures). ” ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref, ref

Mesopotamian Tutelary Deities can be seen as ones related to City-States 

“Historical city-states included Sumerian cities such as Uruk and UrAncient Egyptian city-states, such as Thebes and Memphis; the Phoenician cities (such as Tyre and Sidon); the five Philistine city-states; the Berber city-states of the Garamantes; the city-states of ancient Greece (the poleis such as AthensSpartaThebes, and Corinth); the Roman Republic (which grew from a city-state into a vast empire); the Italian city-states from the Middle Ages to the early modern period, such as FlorenceSienaFerraraMilan (which as they grew in power began to dominate neighboring cities) and Genoa and Venice, which became powerful thalassocracies; the Mayan and other cultures of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica (including cities such as Chichen ItzaTikalCopán and Monte Albán); the central Asian cities along the Silk Road; the city-states of the Swahili coastRagusa; states of the medieval Russian lands such as Novgorod and Pskov; and many others.” ref

“The Uruk period (ca. 4000 to 3100 BCE; also known as Protoliterate period) of Mesopotamia, named after the Sumerian city of Uruk, this period saw the emergence of urban life in Mesopotamia and the Sumerian civilization. City-States like Uruk and others had a patron tutelary City Deity along with a Priest-King.” ref

Chinese folk religion, both past, and present, includes myriad tutelary deities. Exceptional individuals, highly cultivated sages, and prominent ancestors can be deified and honored after death. Lord Guan is the patron of military personnel and police, while Mazu is the patron of fishermen and sailors. Such as Tu Di Gong (Earth Deity) is the tutelary deity of a locality, and each individual locality has its own Earth Deity and Cheng Huang Gong (City God) is the guardian deity of an individual city, worshipped by local officials and locals since imperial times.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) in Hinduism, personal tutelary deities are known as ishta-devata, while family tutelary deities are known as Kuladevata. Gramadevata are guardian deities of villages. Devas can also be seen as tutelary. Shiva is the patron of yogis and renunciants. City goddesses include: Mumbadevi (Mumbai), Sachchika (Osian); Kuladevis include: Ambika (Porwad), and Mahalakshmi. In NorthEast India Meitei mythology and religion (Sanamahism) of Manipur, there are various types of tutelary deities, among which Lam Lais are the most predominant ones. Tibetan Buddhism has Yidam as a tutelary deity. Dakini is the patron of those who seek knowledge.” ref

“A tutelary (also tutelar) The Greeks also thought deities guarded specific places: for instance, Athena was the patron goddess of the city of Athens. Socrates spoke of hearing the voice of his personal spirit or daimonion:

You have often heard me speak of an oracle or sign which comes to me … . This sign I have had ever since I was a child. The sign is a voice which comes to me and always forbids me to do something which I am going to do, but never commands me to do anything, and this is what stands in the way of my being a politician.” ref

“Tutelary deities who guard and preserve a place or a person are fundamental to ancient Roman religion. The tutelary deity of a man was his Genius, that of a woman her Juno. In the Imperial era, the Genius of the Emperor was a focus of Imperial cult. An emperor might also adopt a major deity as his personal patron or tutelary, as Augustus did Apollo. Precedents for claiming the personal protection of a deity were established in the Republican era, when for instance the Roman dictator Sulla advertised the goddess Victory as his tutelary by holding public games (ludi) in her honor.” ref

“Each town or city had one or more tutelary deities, whose protection was considered particularly vital in time of war and siege. Rome itself was protected by a goddess whose name was to be kept ritually secret on pain of death (for a supposed case, see Quintus Valerius Soranus). The Capitoline Triad of Juno, Jupiter, and Minerva were also tutelaries of Rome. The Italic towns had their own tutelary deities. Juno often had this function, as at the Latin town of Lanuvium and the Etruscan city of Veii, and was often housed in an especially grand temple on the arx (citadel) or other prominent or central location. The tutelary deity of Praeneste was Fortuna, whose oracle was renowned.” ref

“The Roman ritual of evocatio was premised on the belief that a town could be made vulnerable to military defeat if the power of its tutelary deity were diverted outside the city, perhaps by the offer of superior cult at Rome. The depiction of some goddesses such as the Magna Mater (Great Mother, or Cybele) as “tower-crowned” represents their capacity to preserve the city. A town in the provinces might adopt a deity from within the Roman religious sphere to serve as its guardian, or syncretize its own tutelary with such; for instance, a community within the civitas of the Remi in Gaul adopted Apollo as its tutelary, and at the capital of the Remi (present-day Rheims), the tutelary was Mars Camulus.” ref 

Household deity (a kind of or related to a Tutelary deity)

“A household deity is a deity or spirit that protects the home, looking after the entire household or certain key members. It has been a common belief in paganism as well as in folklore across many parts of the world. Household deities fit into two types; firstly, a specific deity – typically a goddess – often referred to as a hearth goddess or domestic goddess who is associated with the home and hearth, such as the ancient Greek Hestia.” ref

“The second type of household deities are those that are not one singular deity, but a type, or species of animistic deity, who usually have lesser powers than major deities. This type was common in the religions of antiquity, such as the Lares of ancient Roman religion, the Gashin of Korean shamanism, and Cofgodas of Anglo-Saxon paganism. These survived Christianisation as fairy-like creatures existing in folklore, such as the Anglo-Scottish Brownie and Slavic Domovoy.” ref

“Household deities were usually worshipped not in temples but in the home, where they would be represented by small idols (such as the teraphim of the Bible, often translated as “household gods” in Genesis 31:19 for example), amulets, paintings, or reliefs. They could also be found on domestic objects, such as cosmetic articles in the case of Tawaret. The more prosperous houses might have a small shrine to the household god(s); the lararium served this purpose in the case of the Romans. The gods would be treated as members of the family and invited to join in meals, or be given offerings of food and drink.” ref

“In many religions, both ancient and modern, a god would preside over the home. Certain species, or types, of household deities, existed. An example of this was the Roman Lares. Many European cultures retained house spirits into the modern period. Some examples of these include:

“Although the cosmic status of household deities was not as lofty as that of the Twelve Olympians or the Aesir, they were also jealous of their dignity and also had to be appeased with shrines and offerings, however humble. Because of their immediacy they had arguably more influence on the day-to-day affairs of men than the remote gods did. Vestiges of their worship persisted long after Christianity and other major religions extirpated nearly every trace of the major pagan pantheons. Elements of the practice can be seen even today, with Christian accretions, where statues to various saints (such as St. Francis) protect gardens and grottos. Even the gargoyles found on older churches, could be viewed as guardians partitioning a sacred space.” ref

“For centuries, Christianity fought a mop-up war against these lingering minor pagan deities, but they proved tenacious. For example, Martin Luther‘s Tischreden have numerous – quite serious – references to dealing with kobolds. Eventually, rationalism and the Industrial Revolution threatened to erase most of these minor deities, until the advent of romantic nationalism rehabilitated them and embellished them into objects of literary curiosity in the 19th century. Since the 20th century this literature has been mined for characters for role-playing games, video games, and other fantasy personae, not infrequently invested with invented traits and hierarchies somewhat different from their mythological and folkloric roots.” ref

“In contradistinction to both Herbert Spencer and Edward Burnett Tylor, who defended theories of animistic origins of ancestor worship, Émile Durkheim saw its origin in totemism. In reality, this distinction is somewhat academic, since totemism may be regarded as a particularized manifestation of animism, and something of a synthesis of the two positions was attempted by Sigmund Freud. In Freud’s Totem and Taboo, both totem and taboo are outward expressions or manifestations of the same psychological tendency, a concept which is complementary to, or which rather reconciles, the apparent conflict. Freud preferred to emphasize the psychoanalytic implications of the reification of metaphysical forces, but with particular emphasis on its familial nature. This emphasis underscores, rather than weakens, the ancestral component.” ref

William Edward Hearn, a noted classicist, and jurist, traced the origin of domestic deities from the earliest stages as an expression of animism, a belief system thought to have existed also in the neolithic, and the forerunner of Indo-European religion. In his analysis of the Indo-European household, in Chapter II “The House Spirit”, Section 1, he states:

The belief which guided the conduct of our forefathers was … the spirit rule of dead ancestors.” ref

“In Section 2 he proceeds to elaborate:

It is thus certain that the worship of deceased ancestors is a vera causa, and not a mere hypothesis. …

In the other European nations, the Slavs, the Teutons, and the Kelts, the House Spirit appears with no less distinctness. … [T]he existence of that worship does not admit of doubt. … The House Spirits had a multitude of other names which it is needless here to enumerate, but all of which are more or less expressive of their friendly relations with man. … In [England] … [h]e is the Brownie. … In Scotland this same Brownie is well known. He is usually described as attached to particular families, with whom he has been known to reside for centuries, threshing the corn, cleaning the house, and performing similar household tasks. His favorite gratification was milk and honey.” ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref

“These ideas are my speculations from the evidence.”

I am still researching the “god‘s origins” all over the world. So, you know, it is very complicated, but I am smart and willing to look, DEEP, if necessary, which going very deep does seem to be needed here, when trying to actually understand the evolution of gods and goddesses. I am sure of a few things and less sure of others, but even in stuff I am not fully grasping I still am slowly figuring it out, to explain it to others. But as I research more, I am understanding things a little better, though I am still working on understanding it all or something close and thus always figuring out more. 

Sky Father/Sky God?

“Egyptian: (Nut) Sky Mother and (Geb) Earth Father” (Egypt is different but similar)

Turkic/Mongolic: (Tengri/Tenger Etseg) Sky Father and (Eje/Gazar Eej) Earth Mother *Transeurasian*

Hawaiian: (Wākea) Sky Father and (Papahānaumoku) Earth Mother *Austronesian*

New Zealand/ Māori: (Ranginui) Sky Father and (Papatūānuku) Earth Mother *Austronesian*

Proto-Indo-European: (Dyus/Dyus phtr) Sky Father and (Dʰéǵʰōm/Plethwih) Earth Mother

Indo-Aryan: (Dyaus Pita) Sky Father and (Prithvi Mata) Earth Mother *Indo-European*

Italic: (Jupiter) Sky Father and (Juno) Sky Mother *Indo-European*

Etruscan: (Tinia) Sky Father and (Uni) Sky Mother *Tyrsenian/Italy Pre–Indo-European*

Hellenic/Greek: (Zeus) Sky Father and (Hera) Sky Mother who started as an “Earth Goddess” *Indo-European*

Nordic: (Dagr) Sky Father and (Nótt) Sky Mother *Indo-European*

Slavic: (Perun) Sky Father and (Mokosh) Earth Mother *Indo-European*

Illyrian: (Deipaturos) Sky Father and (Messapic Damatura’s “earth-mother” maybe) Earth Mother *Indo-European*

Albanian: (Zojz) Sky Father and (?) *Indo-European*

Baltic: (Perkūnas) Sky Father and (Saulė) Sky Mother *Indo-European*

Germanic: (Týr) Sky Father and (?) *Indo-European*

Colombian-Muisca: (Bochica) Sky Father and (Huythaca) Sky Mother *Chibchan*

Aztec: (Quetzalcoatl) Sky Father and (Xochiquetzal) Sky Mother *Uto-Aztecan*

Incan: (Viracocha) Sky Father and (Mama Runtucaya) Sky Mother *Quechuan*

China: (Tian/Shangdi) Sky Father and (Dì) Earth Mother *Sino-Tibetan*

Sumerian, Assyrian and Babylonian: (An/Anu) Sky Father and (Ki) Earth Mother

Finnish: (Ukko) Sky Father and (Akka) Earth Mother *Finno-Ugric*

Sami: (Horagalles) Sky Father and (Ravdna) Earth Mother *Finno-Ugric*

Puebloan-Zuni: (Ápoyan Ta’chu) Sky Father and (Áwitelin Tsíta) Earth Mother

Puebloan-Hopi: (Tawa) Sky Father and (Kokyangwuti/Spider Woman/Grandmother) Earth Mother *Uto-Aztecan*

Puebloan-Navajo: (Tsohanoai) Sky Father and (Estsanatlehi) Earth Mother *Na-Dene*

refrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefrefref

Sky Father/Sky Mother “High Gods” or similar gods/goddesses of the sky more loosely connected, seeming arcane mythology across the earth seen in Siberia, China, Europe, Native Americans/First Nations People and Mesopotamia, etc.

“In Australian Aboriginal mythologyBaiame (or BiameBiamiBaayamiBaayama, Byamee) is the creator god and sky father, and Birrangulu, or Birrahgnooloo, a “fertility spirit” with powers over water (can send floods if properly asked), maintenance of the earthly landscape, and one of his two wives, can be seen as the mother from the sky, often being identified as an emu. By coming to earth (and possibly staying on earth), she may have become the earth mother and is said to be the mother of DaramulumDaramulum (variations: Darhumulan, Daramulan, Dhurramoolun or Dharramaalan), a sky hero shapeshifter associated with an emu-wife. In other stories, Dharramalan is said to be the brother of Baiame. The Baiame story tells how Baiame came down from the sky to the land and created rivers, mountains, and forests in all the lands. When he had finished, he returned to the sky, and people called him the Sky Hero, or All Father, or Sky Father. He then gave the people their laws of life, traditions, songs, and culture of several Aboriginal Australian peoples of south-eastern Australia, such as the WonnaruaKamilaroiGuringayEoraDarkinjung, and Wiradjuri peoples.” refrefref 

There are Australian Aborigines who believed that the Sun Mother created all the animals, plants, and bodies of water on earth upon the urging of the Father of All Spirits. These two divine beings did not actually have children. Only their names reflected the mother-father theme. However, the Sun Mother was portrayed as one who gives life to the sleeping spirits. A human mother also gives life to a spirit.” ref

I believe that the birth of the Earth Mother, which may have occurred sometime before 10,000 years ago, or after it sometime at least by 8,000 years ago to likely 9,000 years ago from the Sky Woman/Mistress of Animals, took place at Nevalı Çori (8400-8100 BCE or approximately 10,000 years ago), in Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. This new Earth Mother/Mistress of Animals goddess is later seen at Çatal Höyük (7,100-5,700 BCE or 9,100 to 7,700 years ago), sitting figurines, and to me, the standing figurines are likely related to the sky. Later, after 6/5,000 years ago, even sky deities may be depicted as sitting and sitting in a chair/stool in general, after this time seems to be associated with elites and deities. These ideas seem to spread in the movement ways of Haplogroup E, west to Central Turkey as seen at seen at Çatal Höyük, on next to west Turkey, then Europe/Balkans/Ukraine, as seen at the Cucuteni–Trypillia culture, It moved south to Israel and Egypt/North Africa, as well as Sodi Arabia and the Horn of Africa. These ideas seem to spread East to Iran, then Pakistan/India, as seen in the Indus Valley civilization.

From Sky Mother to Earth Mother?

Native American Legends: Sky Woman (Ataensic, Atahensic, Ataentsic)

“Tribal affiliation: Iroquois LeagueWyandot
Native names: Ataensic, Ata-en-sic, Ataentsic, Atahensic, Ataensiq, Aataentsic, Athensic, Ataensie, Eataentsic, Eyatahentsik, Iaataientsik, Yatahentshi; Iotsitsisonh, Iotsitsisen, Iottsitison, Iottsitíson, Atsi’tsiaka:ion, Atsi’tsiakaion, Ajinjagaayonh; Iagen’tci, Iagentci, Eagentci, Yekëhtsi, Yagentci; Awenhai, Awenha’i, Awenha:ih; Wa’tewatsitsiané:kare; Aientsik, Aentsik
Also known as: Grandmother Moon, the Woman who Fell from the Sky
Type: Mother goddesssky spiritfirst woman
Related figures in other tribes: Nokomis (Anishinabe), Our Grandmother (Shawnee)” ref

“Sky Woman is either the grandmother or the mother (depending on the version) of the twin culture heroes Sky-Holder and Flint, sometimes known as Good Spirit and Bad Spirit.” ref

Sky Woman (depending on the version) either dies giving birth to twins and becomes Earth Mother, or Sky Woman has a daughter who dies giving birth to twins, becoming Earth Mother. 

“Myths about Sky Woman vary enormously from community to community. In some Iroquois myths, Sky Woman is a minor character who dies in childbirth immediately upon reaching the earth, while in others, she is the central character of the entire creation saga. In some myths, Sky Woman is the mother of the twins, but more commonly, she is the mother of a daughter, Tekawerahkwa or Breath of the Wind, who in turn gives birth to the twins. In some Iroquois traditions, the twins represent good and evil, while in others, neither twin is evil, but Flint represents destruction, death, night, and winter to Sky-Holder’s creation, life, day, and summer. In many versions of the myth, Sky Woman favored Flint, usually because Flint had deceived her into thinking Sky-Holder killed Tekawerahkwa, but sometimes because Sky Woman herself disapproved of Sky-Holder’s human creations and their ways. In other versions, Sky Woman supported both of her grandchildren equally, declaring that there must be both life and death in the world. Sky Woman is associated with the moon by many Iroquois people. In some traditions, Sky Woman turned into the moon; in others, Sky-Holder turned her body into the sun, moon, and stars after her death; and in still others, it was Sky Woman herself who created the sun, moon, and stars.” ref

“Sky Woman goes by many different names in Iroquois mythology. The name “Sky Woman” itself is a title, not her name– she is a Sky Woman because she is one of the Sky People, Karionake. Her own name is variously given as Ataensic (a Huron name probably meaning “ancient body,”) Iagentci (a Seneca name meaning “ancient woman,”) Iotsitsisonh or Atsi’tsiaka:ion (Mohawk names meaning “fertile flower” and “mature flower,”) Awenhai (a Cayuga and Seneca name also meaning “mature flower,”) and Aentsik (probably an Iroquois borrowing from Huron.) She is sometimes also referred to as Grandmother or Grandmother Moon.” ref

“Sky Woman (Shy Mother in my thinking) is the Iroquois sky goddess who falls from the sky world to a watery world, where animals create land on a turtle’s back. Sky Woman gives birth to the first child on earth, a daughter (Earth Mother in my thinking), who later becomes pregnant, dies in childbirth, giving birth to twins who are polar opposites; her body becomes the source of the Earth’s fertility. The good twin created the Moon and Stars from his mother’s breasts, and tasked them, his sisters, to guard the night sky. He gave the rest of his mother’s body to the earth, the Great Mother from whom all life came. Hahgwehdiyu then planted a seed into his mother’s corpse. From this seed grew corn, as a gift to mankind.” 

According to Mohawk midwife Katsi Cook: “They say corn is the breast milk of Mother Earth. In Akwesasne, a Mohawk community on the New York/Canadian border, the connections between women’s fertile bodies and these important cultural foods are reinforced through Mother Earth gardens, which were planted as part of the Ohero:kon Rites of Passage ceremonies revitalized by Bear Clan Mother Louise MacDonald and her family. As part of this ceremony, young men shape a pile of dirt into the form of a woman’s body, while the uncles lead them in a discussion about the sanctity of women. The young women then plant seeds on the woman-shaped garden—corn at her breasts, strawberries at her heart, beans at her fingers, squash at her navel, and sunchokes at her feet—just as they sprang up from the grave of Sky Woman’s daughter.

Sky Woman (Shy Mother in my thinking) fell from the sky and was placed upon the newly formed earth made for her. Soon after her arrival, Sky Woman gave birth to twins. The firstborn became known as the Good Spirit. The other twin caused his mother so much pain that she died during his birth. He was to be known as the Evil Spirit. The Good Spirit took his mother’s head and hung it in the sky, and it became the sun. The Good Spirit also fashioned the stars and the moon from his mother’s body. He buried the remaining parts of Sky Woman under the earth (Thus, she became Earth Mother, in my thinking). Thus, living things may always find nourishment from the soil, for it springs from Mother Earth. While the Good Spirit provided light, the Evil Spirit created the darkness.” ref

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

ref, ref

Hinduism around 3,700 to 3,500 years old. ref

 Judaism around 3,450 or 3,250 years old. (The first writing in the bible was “Paleo-Hebrew” dated to around 3,000 years ago Khirbet Qeiyafa is the site of an ancient fortress city overlooking the Elah Valley. And many believe the religious Jewish texts were completed around 2,500) ref, ref

Judaism is around 3,450 or 3,250 years old. (“Paleo-Hebrew” 3,000 years ago and Torah 2,500 years ago)

“Judaism is an Abrahamic, its roots as an organized religion in the Middle East during the Bronze Age. Some scholars argue that modern Judaism evolved from Yahwism, the religion of ancient Israel and Judah, by the late 6th century BCE, and is thus considered to be one of the oldest monotheistic religions.” ref

“Yahwism is the name given by modern scholars to the religion of ancient Israel, essentially polytheistic, with a plethora of gods and goddesses. Heading the pantheon was Yahweh, the national god of the Israelite kingdoms of Israel and Judah, with his consort, the goddess Asherah; below them were second-tier gods and goddesses such as Baal, Shamash, Yarikh, Mot, and Astarte, all of whom had their own priests and prophets and numbered royalty among their devotees, and a third and fourth tier of minor divine beings, including the mal’ak, the messengers of the higher gods, who in later times became the angels of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Yahweh, however, was not the ‘original’ god of Israel “Isra-El”; it is El, the head of the Canaanite pantheon, whose name forms the basis of the name “Israel”, and none of the Old Testament patriarchs, the tribes of Israel, the Judges, or the earliest monarchs, have a Yahwistic theophoric name (i.e., one incorporating the name of Yahweh).” ref

“El is a Northwest Semitic word meaning “god” or “deity“, or referring (as a proper name) to any one of multiple major ancient Near Eastern deities. A rarer form, ‘ila, represents the predicate form in Old Akkadian and in Amorite. The word is derived from the Proto-Semitic *ʔil-, meaning “god”. Specific deities known as ‘El or ‘Il include the supreme god of the ancient Canaanite religion and the supreme god of East Semitic speakers in Mesopotamia’s Early Dynastic Period. ʼĒl is listed at the head of many pantheons. In some Canaanite and Ugaritic sources, ʼĒl played a role as father of the gods, of creation, or both. For example, in the Ugaritic texts, ʾil mlk is understood to mean “ʼĒl the King” but ʾil hd as “the god Hadad“. The Semitic root ʾlh (Arabic ʾilāh, Aramaic ʾAlāh, ʾElāh, Hebrew ʾelōah) may be ʾl with a parasitic h, and ʾl may be an abbreviated form of ʾlh. In Ugaritic the plural form meaning “gods” is ʾilhm, equivalent to Hebrew ʾelōhîm “powers”. In the Hebrew texts this word is interpreted as being semantically singular for “god” by biblical commentators. However the documentary hypothesis for the Old Testament (corresponds to the Jewish Torah) developed originally in the 1870s, identifies these that different authors – the Jahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomist, and the Priestly source – were responsible for editing stories from a polytheistic religion into those of a monotheistic religion. Inconsistencies that arise between monotheism and polytheism in the texts are reflective of this hypothesis.” ref

 

Jainism around 2,599 – 2,527 years old. ref

Confucianism around 2,600 – 2,551 years old. ref

Buddhism around 2,563/2,480 – 2,483/2,400 years old. ref

Christianity around 2,o00 years old. ref

Shinto around 1,305 years old. ref

Islam around 1407–1385 years old. ref

Sikhism around 548–478 years old. ref

Bahá’í around 200–125 years old. ref

Knowledge to Ponder: 

Stars/Astrology:

  • Possibly, around 30,000 years ago (in simpler form) to 6,000 years ago, Stars/Astrology are connected to Ancestors, Spirit Animals, and Deities.
  • The star also seems to be a possible proto-star for Star of Ishtar, Star of Inanna, or Star of Venus.
  • Around 7,000 to 6,000 years ago, Star Constellations/Astrology have connections to the “Kurgan phenomenon” of below-ground “mound” stone/wood burial structures and “Dolmen phenomenon” of above-ground stone burial structures.
  • Around 6,500–5,800 years ago, The Northern Levant migrations into Jordon and Israel in the Southern Levant brought new cultural and religious transfer from Turkey and Iran.
  • “The Ghassulian Star,” a mysterious 6,000-year-old mural from Jordan may have connections to the European paganstic kurgan/dolmens phenomenon.

“Astrology is a range of divinatory practices, recognized as pseudoscientific since the 18th century, that claim to discern information about human affairs and terrestrial events by studying the apparent positions of celestial objects. Different cultures have employed forms of astrology since at least the 2nd millennium BCE, these practices having originated in calendrical systems used to predict seasonal shifts and to interpret celestial cycles as signs of divine communications. Most, if not all, cultures have attached importance to what they observed in the sky, and some—such as the HindusChinese, and the Maya—developed elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from celestial observations. Western astrology, one of the oldest astrological systems still in use, can trace its roots to 19th–17th century BCE Mesopotamia, from where it spread to Ancient GreeceRome, the Islamicate world and eventually Central and Western Europe. Contemporary Western astrology is often associated with systems of horoscopes that purport to explain aspects of a person’s personality and predict significant events in their lives based on the positions of celestial objects; the majority of professional astrologers rely on such systems.” ref 

Around 5,500 years ago, Science evolves, The first evidence of science was 5,500 years ago and was demonstrated by a body of empirical, theoretical, and practical knowledge about the natural world. ref

Around 5,000 years ago, Origin of Logics is a Naturalistic Observation (principles of valid reasoning, inference, & demonstration) ref

Around 4,150 to 4,000 years ago: The earliest surviving versions of the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh, which was originally titled “He who Saw the Deep” (Sha naqba īmuru) or “Surpassing All Other Kings” (Shūtur eli sharrī) were written. ref

Hinduism:

  • 3,700 years ago or so, the oldest of the Hindu Vedas (scriptures), the Rig Veda was composed.
  • 3,500 years ago or so, the Vedic Age began in India after the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization.

Judaism:

  • around 3,000 years ago, the first writing in the bible was “Paleo-Hebrew”
  • around 2,500 years ago, many believe the religious Jewish texts were completed

Myths: The bible inspired religion is not just one religion or one myth but a grouping of several religions and myths

  • Around 3,450 or 3,250 years ago, according to legend, is the traditionally accepted period in which the Israelite lawgiver, Moses, provided the Ten Commandments.
  • Around 2,500 to 2,400 years ago, a collection of ancient religious writings by the Israelites based primarily upon the Hebrew Bible, Tanakh, or Old Testament is the first part of Christianity’s bible.
  • Around 2,400 years ago, the most accepted hypothesis is that the canon was formed in stages, first the Pentateuch (Torah).
  • Around 2,140 to 2,116 years ago, the Prophets was written during the Hasmonean dynasty, and finally the remaining books.
  • Christians traditionally divide the Old Testament into four sections:
  • The first five books or Pentateuch (Torah).
  • The proposed history books telling the history of the Israelites from their conquest of Canaan to their defeat and exile in Babylon.
  • The poetic and proposed “Wisdom books” dealing, in various forms, with questions of good and evil in the world.
  • The books of the biblical prophets, warning of the consequences of turning away from God:
  • Henotheism:
  • Exodus 20:23 “You shall not make other gods besides Me (not saying there are no other gods just not to worship them); gods of silver or gods of gold, you shall not make for yourselves.”
  • Polytheism:
  • Judges 10:6 “Then the sons of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, served the Baals and the Ashtaroth, the gods of Aram, the gods of Sidon, the gods of Moab, the gods of the sons of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines; thus they forsook the LORD and did not serve Him.”
  • 1 Corinthians 8:5 “For even if there are so-called gods whether in heaven or on earth, as indeed there are many gods and many lords.”
  • Monotheism:
  • Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me.

Around 2,570 to 2,270 Years Ago, there is a confirmation of atheistic doubting as well as atheistic thinking, mainly by Greek philosophers. However, doubting gods is likely as old as the invention of gods and should destroy the thinking that belief in god(s) is the “default belief”. The Greek word is apistos (a “not” and pistos “faithful,”), thus not faithful or faithless because one is unpersuaded and unconvinced by a god(s) claim. Short Definition: unbelieving, unbeliever, or unbelief.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

Expressions of Atheistic Thinking:

  • Around 2,600 years ago, Ajita Kesakambali, ancient Indian philosopher, who is the first known proponent of Indian materialism. ref
  • Around 2,535 to 2,475 years ago, Heraclitus, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher, a native of the Greek city Ephesus, Ionia, on the coast of Anatolia, also known as Asia Minor or modern Turkey. ref
  • Around 2,500 to 2,400 years ago, according to The Story of Civilization book series certain African pygmy tribes have no identifiable gods, spirits, or religious beliefs or rituals, and even what burials accrue are without ceremony. ref
  • Around 2,490 to 2,430 years ago, Empedocles, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher and a citizen of Agrigentum, a Greek city in Sicily. ref
  • Around 2,460 to 2,370 years ago, Democritus, Greek pre-Socratic philosopher considered to be the “father of modern science” possibly had some disbelief amounting to atheism. ref
  • Around 2,399 years ago or so, Socrates, a famous Greek philosopher was tried for sinfulness by teaching doubt of state gods. ref
  • Around 2,341 to 2,270 years ago, Epicurus, a Greek philosopher known for composing atheistic critics and famously stated, “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ref

This last expression by Epicurus, seems to be an expression of Axiological Atheism. To understand and utilize value or actually possess “Value Conscious/Consciousness” to both give a strong moral “axiological” argument (the problem of evil) as well as use it to fortify humanism and positive ethical persuasion of human helping and care responsibilities. Because value-blindness gives rise to sociopathic/psychopathic evil.

“Theists, there has to be a god, as something can not come from nothing.”

Well, thus something (unknown) happened and then there was something. This does not tell us what the something that may have been involved with something coming from nothing. A supposed first cause, thus something (unknown) happened and then there was something is not an open invitation to claim it as known, neither is it justified to call or label such an unknown as anything, especially an unsubstantiated magical thinking belief born of mythology and religious storytelling.

How do they even know if there was nothing as a start outside our universe, could there not be other universes outside our own?
 
For all, we know there may have always been something past the supposed Big Bang we can’t see beyond, like our universe as one part of a mega system.

Dylan Violette (CopperViolette)

Psychology Minor and Philosophy Student who’s interested in archaeology, history, and astronomy.
Current Research Interests: The Archaic Era in North America; Long-Distance Trading Across the Americas; Eurasian Prehistory. Current Research Focus: The Eastern Archaic and the Megalithic Builders (10,000 – 1,177 B.C.E.).

Dylan Violette and I decided to blog jointly and will start doing videos together as well. Cory has had to step away from our joint endeavors we did for years, as he has issues he needs to focus on, and my friend Dylan is willing to step in and help me continue making thoughtful videos together.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

While hallucinogens are associated with shamanism, it is alcohol that is associated with paganism.

The Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries Shows in the prehistory series:

Show one: Prehistory: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” the division of labor, power, rights, and recourses.

Show two: Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show tree: Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show four: Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show five: Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”

Show six: Emergence of hierarchy, sexism, slavery, and the new male god dominance: Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves!

Show seven: Paganism 5,000 years old: progressed organized religion and the state: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Kings and the Rise of the State)

Show eight: Paganism 4,000 years old: Moralistic gods after the rise of Statism and often support Statism/Kings: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (First Moralistic gods, then the Origin time of Monotheism)

Prehistory: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” the division of labor, power, rights, and recourses: VIDEO

Pre-animism 300,000 years old and animism 100,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Totemism 50,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Shamanism 30,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism”: VIDEO

Paganism 12,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Pre-Capitalism): VIDEO

Paganism 7,000-5,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Capitalism) (World War 0) Elite and their slaves: VIEDO

Paganism 5,000 years old: progressed organized religion and the state: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (Kings and the Rise of the State): VIEDO

Paganism 4,000 years old: related to “Anarchism and Socialism” (First Moralistic gods, then the Origin time of Monotheism): VIEDO

I do not hate simply because I challenge and expose myths or lies any more than others being thought of as loving simply because of the protection and hiding from challenge their favored myths or lies.

The truth is best championed in the sunlight of challenge.

An archaeologist once said to me “Damien religion and culture are very different”

My response, So are you saying that was always that way, such as would you say Native Americans’ cultures are separate from their religions? And do you think it always was the way you believe?

I had said that religion was a cultural product. That is still how I see it and there are other archaeologists that think close to me as well. Gods too are the myths of cultures that did not understand science or the world around them, seeing magic/supernatural everywhere.

I personally think there is a goddess and not enough evidence to support a male god at Çatalhöyük but if there was both a male and female god and goddess then I know the kind of gods they were like Proto-Indo-European mythology.

This series idea was addressed in, Anarchist Teaching as Free Public Education or Free Education in the Public: VIDEO

Our 12 video series: Organized Oppression: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of power (9,000-4,000 years ago), is adapted from: The Complete and Concise History of the Sumerians and Early Bronze Age Mesopotamia (7000-2000 BC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szFjxmY7jQA by “History with Cy

Show #1: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Samarra, Halaf, Ubaid)

Show #2: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Eridu: First City of Power)

Show #3: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Uruk and the First Cities)

Show #4: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (First Kings)

Show #5: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Early Dynastic Period)

Show #6: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (King Lugalzagesi and the First Empire)

Show #7: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Sargon and Akkadian Rule)

Show #8: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Naram-Sin, Post-Akkadian Rule, and the Gutians)

Show #9: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Gudea of Lagash and Utu-hegal)

Show #10: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Third Dynasty of Ur / Neo-Sumerian Empire)

Show #11: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Amorites, Elamites, and the End of an Era)

Show #12: Mesopotamian State Force and the Politics of Power (Aftermath and Legacy of Sumer)

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

The “Atheist-Humanist-Leftist Revolutionaries”

Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ Atheist Leftist @Skepticallefty & I (Damien Marie AtHope) @AthopeMarie (my YouTube & related blog) are working jointly in atheist, antitheist, antireligionist, antifascist, anarchist, socialist, and humanist endeavors in our videos together, generally, every other Saturday.

Why Does Power Bring Responsibility?

Think, how often is it the powerless that start wars, oppress others, or commit genocide? So, I guess the question is to us all, to ask, how can power not carry responsibility in a humanity concept? I know I see the deep ethical responsibility that if there is power their must be a humanistic responsibility of ethical and empathic stewardship of that power. Will I be brave enough to be kind? Will I possess enough courage to be compassionate? Will my valor reach its height of empathy? I as everyone, earns our justified respect by our actions, that are good, ethical, just, protecting, and kind. Do I have enough self-respect to put my love for humanity’s flushing, over being brought down by some of its bad actors? May we all be the ones doing good actions in the world, to help human flourishing.

I create the world I want to live in, striving for flourishing. Which is not a place but a positive potential involvement and promotion; a life of humanist goal precision. To master oneself, also means mastering positive prosocial behaviors needed for human flourishing. I may have lost a god myth as an atheist, but I am happy to tell you, my friend, it is exactly because of that, leaving the mental terrorizer, god belief, that I truly regained my connected ethical as well as kind humanity.

Cory and I will talk about prehistory and theism, addressing the relevance to atheism, anarchism, and socialism.

At the same time as the rise of the male god, 7,000 years ago, there was also the very time there was the rise of violence, war, and clans to kingdoms, then empires, then states. It is all connected back to 7,000 years ago, and it moved across the world.

Cory Johnston: https://damienmarieathope.com/2021/04/cory-johnston-mind-of-a-skeptical-leftist/?v=32aec8db952d  

The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist (YouTube)

Cory Johnston: Mind of a Skeptical Leftist @Skepticallefty

The Mind of a Skeptical Leftist By Cory Johnston: “Promoting critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics by covering current events and talking to a variety of people. Cory Johnston has been thoughtfully talking to people and attempting to promote critical thinking, social justice, and left-wing politics.” http://anchor.fm/skepticalleft

Cory needs our support. We rise by helping each other.

Cory Johnston ☭ Ⓐ @Skepticallefty Evidence-based atheist leftist (he/him) Producer, host, and co-host of 4 podcasts @skeptarchy @skpoliticspod and @AthopeMarie

Damien Marie AtHope (“At Hope”) Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist. Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Poet, Philosopher, Advocate, Activist, Psychology, and Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Historian.

Damien is interested in: Freedom, Liberty, Justice, Equality, Ethics, Humanism, Science, Atheism, Antiteism, Antireligionism, Ignosticism, Left-Libertarianism, Anarchism, Socialism, Mutualism, Axiology, Metaphysics, LGBTQI, Philosophy, Advocacy, Activism, Mental Health, Psychology, Archaeology, Social Work, Sexual Rights, Marriage Rights, Woman’s Rights, Gender Rights, Child Rights, Secular Rights, Race Equality, Ageism/Disability Equality, Etc. And a far-leftist, “Anarcho-Humanist.”

I am not a good fit in the atheist movement that is mostly pro-capitalist, I am anti-capitalist. Mostly pro-skeptic, I am a rationalist not valuing skepticism. Mostly pro-agnostic, I am anti-agnostic. Mostly limited to anti-Abrahamic religions, I am an anti-religionist.

My updated thoughts on the Evolution of Gods?
 
Animal protector tutelary deities at least 13,000/12,000 years ago, from old totems/spirit animal beliefs (tutelary animal spirits as protectors are at least 30,000 years old, as seen with dogs or dog-like animals) come first to me. Next, human sky/star/constellation deities focused representation on life-size or large nude male statues 11,000/10,000 years ago (Sky Father?), as well as small female figurines and female animal statues (Sky Mother?). Then, males (Hunter/Hurder) seem to lose some importance (Agriculture reliance may explain why), and the rise of Earth Mother (Gatherer becomes more important/powerful) female goddesses develop and are in control around 8,000 years ago. Women as the main power did not last long. Then male gods came roaring back about 7,000 to 5,000 years ago with clan wars. The “male god” seems to have forcefully become prominent/dominant around 7,000 years ago (Supreme Gods?). The “King of the Gods” idea likely is from the time of priest-kings 6,000 years ago. Whereas the now favored monotheism “male god” is more like after 4,000 years ago or so. Moralistic gods seem to relate to around 5,000/4,000 years ago, and monotheistic gods are last at around 4,000/3,000 years ago. Many monotheism-themed religions started in henotheism, emerging out of polytheism/paganism.
 
Gods?
“Animism” is needed to begin supernatural thinking.
“Totemism” is needed for supernatural thinking connecting human actions & related to clan/tribe.
“Shamanism” is needed for supernatural thinking to be controllable/changeable by special persons.
Together = Gods/paganism
 
Gods, like religions in general, are cultural products. To me, high gods, like “Sky Father” (Sun or Blue Sky usually, or Storm deities on the deity’s “dark side” like Yin and Yang) or “Sky Mother” (Moon or Stars) myths beliefs are at 39% when tested, in hunter-gatherers the world over.
The Evolution of Deities was not a one-and-done?
 
To me, the God of Sky, relating to stars 12,000 to 11,000 years ago, is older than the sun god of the sky 10,000 to maybe 11,000 years ago, but 10,000 seems more evident. Likewise, to me, the Mother Goddess of the sky was first 10,000 to maybe 11,000 years ago. All in the Middle East. Then, around 9,000 to 8,000, seemingly more evident 8,000 years ago, is the Earth Goddesses, also from the Middle East, likely once the Dawn goddesses or another goddess of the sky, possibly the night. Who dies in the childbirth of the Twins and by going to the underworld, is associated with the earth? Or is believed to live in the Earth at night, making her an Earth Goddess. These ideas were spread in several different ways, which impacted the entire world both directly and indirectly. It involved several different languages and DNA moving in different directions at various times. It is complicated and moving in different ways, even back and forth with different ideas moving both back and forth, especially in and out of the Middle East and Siberia.

Around 10,000 years ago, ideas went into Africa. Around 10,000 to 9,000 years ago, these ideas from the Middle East were in Siberia then moved to China and to the Americas by around 9,000 years ago. Religious ideas also left the Middle East from 9,000 to 8,000 years ago to Europe. Around 8,000 years ago, new ideas got to Ukraine but didn’t spread far. From 8,000 to 7,000 years ago, ideas again entered Africa with evolved beliefs from the Middle East. By 7,000 years ago, evolved deities from the Middle East moved again to Europe and Ukraine. And 7,000 years ago, the Siberian sun god of the sky, with a warrior culture, armed forts, and pre-kurgans, moved from Siberia to Ukraine and then returned to the Middle East around 6,000 years ago, influencing the Sumerian religious ideas. 6,000 to 5,000 years ago, these new Siberian influenced ideas from the Middle East were also in Africa. Then new evolved ideas moved back out of from Ukraine to the East by 5,500 to 5,000 years ago to Siberia, then China, and the Americas. Ideas from Ukraine went into Europe as well. Then, 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, the new ideas, now somewhat evolved again, from Siberia headed back to Europe, and so did ideas from the Middle East. ETC. This is just a rough outline to grasp some of the details, as I feel I understand them. There is a bit more, but this gives a good idea of how complicated it was.

Evidence relating to the Origins of the first human form Deities?
 

I think the person, snakes, and two birds seen at Körtik Tepe is the oldest known Neolithic archaeological site in Turkey, more than 12,000 years old, were likely related to the Orion constellation as a shamanic figure holding a snake, referencing the use of the Milky Way to communicate with the gods and ancestors, as well as soul travel via the Milky Way. The big snake to me would reference the Milky Way itself and the two birds, either the star Venus and the moon, or some aspect of the sun, and the moon, but the sun aspect was likely not the noon sun by itself, as I see that as gaining prominence at a later date. And I think the other figures, also related to the Orion constellation, either as a deity or a deity of the stars, put Orion there. I assume, as seen at Tell Fekheriye, Syria, 11,000 to 9,000 years old, involving two standing figures on “step stools of power” that by 11,000 years ago were at least two sky deities, such as something similar to both a sky father and a sky mother deity, at this time, related to the stars, or planets (also seen as stars or star-like). But we must remember that planets were seen as star-related in mythology.

High Gods and a Divine Couple (universal mommy and daddy)?

I think high gods started with a divine couple, a sky god (sky father) “Day sky, often the Sun” and a sky goddess (sky mother) “Night sky, often the Noon” around 11,000 years ago or older, associated with pre-pastoralism animal management, early herding, and proto-pastoralism, of big-horned goats, big-horned sheep, both domesticated around 11,000 years ago, and cattle domesticated around 10,000 years ago or a little older, especially so with cattle, the last three. Then, as farming and agriculture grew and the domestication of grains emerged a little after 10,000 to 9,000 years ago, and along came a new Earth goddess (Earth Mother), who then commonly took the place of the older sky goddess (sky mother) as the wife or consort to the sky god (sky father). This younger divine couple, a sky god (sky father) and Earth goddess (Earth Mother), becomes the norm the world over. Spread largely with the spread of farming and agriculture to me. 

The myths of (Sky Father) and Earth Mothers in general are found throughout the world, and I think started in the Middle East, with their origins around 11,000 years ago or older. Though totem couple artifacts are seen in Siberia’s Lake Baikal area with the Ancient North Eurasians Mal’ta–Buret’ culture (24,000 years ago) and seem to trace back to at least Russia, above the area between north of the Black Sea and the Caucasus mountains at the Kostenki site 25,000 years ago, a time when Kostenki is related to the eastern Gravettian culture, because the Kostenki site started with Aurignacian culture. I think the couple theme, though it seems to have evidence dating back to at least 25,000 years ago in portable totem pole-like figurines, was not considered deities until they evolved in the Middle East, due to different lifestyles creating a motivation for different thinking, a transition from hunting and gathering to herding and farming.

Some think the Sun was the first god…
To Damien, the first god was related to stars, not the sun. From the 8-pointed Star of Ishtar, to the Dingir symbol in Sumerian cuneiform representing an 8-pointed star, not the sun, meaning “god.” Or in Egypt, an eight-pointed star symbolized the Ogdoad, eight primordial deities. I do think the sun god is very old, at least 6,000 to 7,000 years ago, and maybe older, but not the first. Certainly, the Sky father/sun god/sky god (“blue sky” thus “daytime sky” with the Sun at its most represented) is a universal archetype seen around the World in many different cultural mythologies and shares relatedness. Also commonly paired with an Earth mother goddess archetype.
Sun as three gods and goddesses?
The three parts/beings of the sun in a mythological perspective?
Many cultures, unaware that the morning, noon, and evening sun appearances were the same object, gave them distinct names and associations. Was the Sun seen as a star sometimes or all the time? Well, a common belief held that Venus was both a morning and an evening star related to the morning and/or evening sun. But sometimes Venus was seen as only one, and sometimes related to male rather than female deities/divine beings. Unlike the morning and evening sun expressions, the noon sun isn’t typically seen as a star but rather as a powerful deity or celestial being. When I talk about the stars being related to the first deities but not the sun, I am referring to the noon sun/blue sky-related gods. The noon sun was sometimes depicted as a powerful, radiant star pattern, like the eight-pointed Star of Ishtar (linked to the planet Venus) or the sun-disc with rays.
And the noon Sun disc in art may be depicted as a radiant orb, a winged disk, or a star-like disc with rays. But all a symbol used does make the noon Sun a star god, even though we today understand the sun in all its expressions is one thing and is a star like other stars. It could be said a star symbolized all Sumerian gods, yet all gods were not star deities. The Dingir symbol in ancient Sumerian cuneiform was a sign shaped like an eight-pointed star, signifying “deity,” and was used before divine names of different deities to establish them as deities, but not specifically as star gods.

Damien Marie AtHope’s Art

Damien Marie AtHope (Said as “At” “Hope”)/(Autodidact Polymath but not good at math):

Axiological Atheist, Anti-theist, Anti-religionist, Secular Humanist, Rationalist, Writer, Artist, Jeweler, Poet, “autodidact” Philosopher, schooled in Psychology, and “autodidact” Armchair Archaeology/Anthropology/Pre-Historian (Knowledgeable in the range of: 1 million to 5,000/4,000 years ago). I am an anarchist socialist politically. Reasons for or Types of Atheism

My Website, My Blog, & Short-writing or QuotesMy YouTube, Twitter: @AthopeMarie, and My Email: damien.marie.athope@gmail.com

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This